Skip to main content
Sports Medicine - Open
Download PDF

Associations of Prolonged Occupational Sitting with the Spectrum of Kidney Disease: Results from a Cohort of a Half-Million Asian Adults

Sports Medicine - Open volume 8, Article number: 147 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Kidney diseases are viewed as continuously progressing diseases from microalbuminuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD), to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and its mortality including deaths. The report on the association between prolonged sitting and kidney diseases is limited.

Methods

We examined a cohort of 455,506 participants in a screening program in Taiwan conducted between 1996 and 2017. Data on occupational sedentary behavior and physical activity were collected with a standardized questionnaire. The outcomes of ESRD and death were identified by linking with the Catastrophic Illness Dataset and Cause of Death Data. The association between prolonged sitting and CKD, the incidence of ESRD, and death were assessed using logistic regression models to compute odds ratios (ORs) and Cox proportional hazards models for hazard ratios (HRs).

Results

More than half of the participants, i.e., 265,948 (58.4%), were categorized as “prolonged sitting” during their work. During a median of 13 years of follow-up, we identified 2227 individuals undergoing dialysis and 25,671 deaths. Prolonged occupational sitting was significantly associated with a higher risk of CKD (OR: 1.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.21, 1.31), ESRD (HR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.03, 1.38), and kidney-specific mortality (HR: 1.43, 95% CI 1.07, 1.91) compared to mostly standing participants after controlling for physical activity and other risk factors. Inactive prolonged sitting carries a significantly higher risk of ESRD than physically active mostly standing participants (HR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.04, 1.73). However, active prolonged sitting decreased the risk of ESRD (HR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.79, 1.34) compared to inactive prolonged sitting.

Conclusion

The results suggest that prolonged occupational sitting is associated with a greater risk of the spectrum of kidney disease, proteinuria, CKD, dialysis (ESRD), and mortality for all causes and kidney diseases. Physical activity, even at a minimal level of 15 min/day (90 min/week) of moderate-intensity exercise, was associated with a reduction in these risks.

Key Points

  • Prolonged occupational sitting was significantly associated with a higher risk of chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and kidney-specific mortality compared to mostly standers.

  • Prolonged occupational sitters had a significantly higher risk of ESRD among men, younger or older, smoking, hypertensive or diabetic participants when compared to mostly standers.

  • Staying active and shortening the amount of time spent sitting may be important ways to lower the risk of the spectrum of kidney diseases.

Introduction

In 1949, a classic study found that sedentary bus drivers who mostly sat all day had twice as many heart attacks as bus conductors who mostly stood all day [1, 2]. Since this early study, the prevalence of sedentary behavior has increased [3]. Even when physical activity guidelines are met, sitting for prolonged periods can compromise metabolic health [4]. Several studies have attempted to find an association between prolonged occupational sitting and risks of kidney disease [5,6,7,8,9,10], but the link remains uncertain. Sedentary behavior has been associated with a higher risk of proteinuria [6] which can be a sign of kidney disease, while another study found increased sedentary behavior to be associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) but not proteinuria [8]. Additionally, sitting time has been cross-sectionally associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [5, 8, 10] and yet there are still very limited longitudinal studies to explore if sedentary behavior is prospectively associated with a high risk of kidney diseases [11]. To understand such causal relationships, researchers need to understand the link between prolonged occupational sitting and CKD spectrum, including low eGFR, proteinuria, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and kidney-disease-related deaths.

In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) addressed sedentary behavior in guidelines for physical activity and indicated prolonged sitting as a risk behavior [12]. These guidelines provided, for the first time, recommendations related to the association of sedentary behavior with health outcomes. Improving Global Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes in 2020 [13] also advised the avoidance of sedentary behavior, suggesting that sedentary behavior is associated with a higher risk of hospitalization due to CKD and death. These guidelines emphasize reducing sedentary behavior and increasing the amount of physical activity to reduce the risk of kidney disease. However, there is still limited evidence on whether prolonged occupational sitting increases the risk of kidney disease.

With the world’s highest ESRD prevalence in Taiwan [14], we were able to link data from a large cohort comprising more than a half-million individuals with the Catastrophic Illness Registry [15], which maintained a national record of all patients with ESRD. We hypothesized that prolonged occupational sitting would be associated with CKD and ESRD, after adjustment for physical activity and other cardiovascular confounders. The objectives of this analysis were: (1) to quantify the relationship between prolonged occupational sitting and risk of kidney disease, including CKD, ESRD, and mortality due to kidney disease; (2) to explore the interaction between prolonged occupational sitting and physical activity on ESRD risk; (3) and to investigate whether prolonged occupational sitting is associated with a higher risk of ESRD in subgroups based on age, sex, and cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Methods

Participants

The Taiwan MJ Cohort builds upon a large database and biorepository of healthy individuals undergoing a health screening program in Taiwan conducted by MJ Group. There are four centers in the northern (Taipei), northwest (Taoyuan), central (Taichung), and southern (Kaohsiung) parts of Taiwan. These participants are from all over Taiwan. All four centers used identical screening procedures with the same models of instruments, and the results were centrally managed and stored. Participants underwent a standardized physical examination and biochemical blood and urine tests and completed a self-administered questionnaire on lifestyle and medical history. All participants were encouraged to visit on a yearly basis, and the same questionnaires were filled out on every examination, but results from the initial visit were used in this study. We excluded participants with the following conditions: missing data on prolonged occupational sitting (9.0%), physical activity (5.2%), eGFR (0.6%), or proteinuria (4.6%). Participants with a history of kidney disease (1.3%) and those undergoing dialysis before the screening (0.04%) were also excluded (see Fig. 1). We conducted our analysis in the Taiwan MJ Cohort comprising 455,506 participants aged 20 years or older who underwent a series of medical screenings between 1996 and 2017. The 21-year study period yielded 5.87 million person-years of follow-up for ESRD. This study has received ethical approval from China Medical University and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All data related to personal identification were removed, and analyses were conducted at the Data Science Center of the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of participants included in this study. eGFR Estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD End-stage renal disease; IQR Interquartile range

Full size image

Prolonged Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity

We defined prolonged sitting status using results from the questionnaire on occupational activity. Participants were asked, ‘During your work, do you “mostly sit,” “alternate between sitting and standing,” “mostly stand” or “use all of your major muscles?”.’ We defined respondents who indicated they “mostly sit” during work as prolonged occupational sitters and those who indicated they “mostly stand” as occupational non-sitters. The reliability of occupational sitting status was measured by consistency in questionnaire answers given from two different visits. There was an acceptable correlation of occupational sitting status in participants with data for two visits (time interval: 2.2 ± 2.06 years), with a 0.63 (p < 0.001) Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (Appendix Table 5). We compared ESRD outcomes in participants with at least two visits who were consistent in their reporting of occupational activity. Compared with participants in the mostly standing group, participants in the mostly sitting group had HRs for ESRD of 1.23 (95% CI 1.07, 1.40) on their first visit and 1.24 (0.96, 1.20) on their second visit. These values were sufficiently close, indicating that the validity of our questionnaire was within an acceptable range (Appendix Table 6). Participants were also asked to indicate the type and duration of weekly leisure time physical activity (LTPA). We classified participants into three categories based on their volume of PA per week. The PA categories, based on Ainsworth’s Compendium [16], are inactive (< 3.75 MET-hour), low (3.75–7.49 MET-hour), and medium or above (≥ 7.50 MET-hour). Participants in the medium or above group were in physical activity and met the recommended amount of PA for adults of at least 150 min of moderate-intensity exercise per week. The reliability and validity of the PA questionnaire have been previously demonstrated [17,18,19].

Chronic Kidney Disease, End-Stage Renal Disease, and Mortality Due to Kidney Disease

We used the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation to estimate the glomerular filtration rate [20]. We used the Roche Miditron M semi-automated computer-assisted urinalysis system to test urinary protein, with positive results reported as trace, 1+ , 2+ or more. The definition of chronic kidney disease is as follows: Stage 1 CKD: eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the detection of proteinuria is more than trace; Stage 2 CKD: eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the examination of proteinuria is more than trace; Stage 3 chronic kidney disease: eGFR 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2; Stage 4 chronic kidney disease: eGFR 15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2; and Stage 5 chronic kidney disease: eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2. The incidence of ESRD was ascertained by linking the identification numbers of individual cohort members with the nationwide Registry of Patients with Catastrophic Illness through the end of 2017 using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes. For the study cohort, we included individuals diagnosed with ESRD based on ICD-9-CM code 585 or ICD-10-CM codes N18.5 and N18.6 as well as those with a kidney transplant [15]. Taiwan has a registry of deaths of citizens coded from death certificates. Causes of death are classified according to ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes and consist of all-cause, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and kidney diseases.

Covariates

Education levels were classified as middle school or lower, high school, junior college, and college or higher. Smoking status includes current, ex-smokers, and never-smokers from self-reported questionnaire. Drinking was defined as drinking alcohol three times or more a week and two or more drinks each time. Participants were defined as having diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia if they had a history of these diseases or positive screening results such as fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL, respectively. Participants were asked whether they were long-term users of Chinese herbal medicines or painkillers. Participants with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 and < 30 kg/m2 were classified as overweight. Participants with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 were classified as obese.

Statistical Analysis

We calculated odds ratios (ORs) to compare the risk of kidney disease, including CKD, eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and proteinuria (trace or above) for prolonged occupational sitters, those who alternate between sitting and standing, and those who reported “using all of your major muscles compared to mostly standers. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) to compare ESRD and mortality risk among the occupational activity categories (i.e., prolonged sitters, alternating sitting and standing, and non-sitters). Categorical variables were sex, education; smoking; alcohol drinking; diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia; long-term use of herbal medicine; long-term use of painkillers; and physical activity levels. Continuous variables were age and BMI. Time at entry was the date of recruitment, and time of exit was the end of follow-up (Dec 31, 2017), or date of death, or date of ESRD diagnosis, whichever was earlier. We calculated HRs using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and adjusted for age, sex, education level, smoking status, drinking status, BMI, diabetes status, hypertension status, long-term use of herbal medicine, long-term use of painkillers, and physical activity. We conducted stratified analyses to evaluate a potential effect modification by baseline sex, age (60 years as cutoff), and other covariates, and no significant interaction was found. In addition, we analyzed the incidence of CKD in participants who had two visits. About half (205,617 (45%)) had data for two visits. We excluded those with CKD at the first visit, including 14,512 people with CKD stages 1 to 5, as well as those with proteinuria (n = 10,311) (Appendix Fig. 3). Data were available for two visits for 174,366 people who did not have CKD at the first visit. We analyzed these data to determine if prolonged occupational sitters had a higher risk of developing CKD, proteinuria, or eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the second visit than those who were mostly standers. We performed sensitivity analyses by excluding participants undergoing dialysis or with a kidney transplant within the first 2 years of follow-up or those with stage 5 CKD (eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2). All statistical analyses were performed in SAS version 9.4. Two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 presents the characteristics of 455,506 participants in the four prolonged occupational sitting categories. More than half of the participants (58.4%) were prolonged occupational sitters, and one-tenth (10.5%) were mostly standers. Compared to mostly standers, prolonged occupational sitters tended to be younger, female, inactive and have a higher education level (see Table 1). Prolonged sitters had lower rates of proteinuria (5.9% vs. 6.9%), although eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was similar for both groups (3.8% vs. 3.8%). While the group of prolonged occupational sitters included fewer individuals with CKD (8.9% vs. 10.0%), ORs adjusted for age and covariates indicated that prolonged occupational sitters had a higher risk of CKD (OR: 1.26, 95% CI 1.21, 1.31), proteinuria (OR: 1.12, 95% CI 1.08, 1.18), and eGFR < 60 (OR: 1.46, 95% CI 1.38, 1.56) compared to mostly standers (see Tables 2 and 3).

Table 1 Characteristics of participants by occupational sedentary status
Full size table
Table 2 Risk of kidney diseases including CKD (proteinuria and lower eGFR) by occupational sedentary status from cross-sectional data
Full size table
Table 3 Risk of ESRD and mortality due to kidney disease by occupational sedentary status from longitudinal follow-up data
Full size table

During the median 13-year follow-up, we identified 2227 individuals undergoing dialysis and 25,671 deaths. Prolonged occupational sitters had a significantly higher risk of ESRD (HR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.03, 1.38) compared to mostly standers adjusted for physical activity and other confounders. After adjusting for the same confounders as the previous results (Tables 2 and 3), prolonged occupational sitters had a 43% increased risk of mortality due to kidney disease compared to mostly standers (HR: 1.43, 95% CI 1.07, 1.91). Prolonged sitters also had an increased risk of all-cause (HR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.05, 1.14), cardiovascular disease (CVD) (HR: 1.27, 95% CI 1.16, 1.39), and diabetes (HR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.21, 1.78) mortality. We analyzed the incidence of CKD in participants who had two visits (Appendix Table 7). Data on two visits were available for 174,366 people who did not have CKD on the first visit. Of these people, 8505 developed CKD by the second visit; 6131 had proteinuria by the second visit; and 2587 had eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the second visit. Prolonged occupational sitters did not have a significantly increased risk of developing CKD (HR: 1.02, 95% CI 0.95, 1.10) and developing proteinuria (HR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.86, 1.10) compared to mostly standers. However, prolonged occupational sitters had a 25% increased risk compared to mostly standers for eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Appendix Table 8).

We conducted sensitivity analyses by excluding participants undergoing dialysis or with a kidney transplant within the first 2 years of follow-up, prolonged occupational sitters still had a significantly higher risk of ESRD (HR: 1.17, 95% CI 1.01, 1.36) compared to mostly standers (Appendix Table 9). When excluding individuals with stage 5 CKD at baseline, the results were similar (HR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.03, 1.38). In stratification analysis, there was no significant interaction between each covariate and prolonged sitting of the risk of ESRD. We found that prolonged sitters had a significantly higher risk of ESRD among male, younger or older, smoking, hypertensive or diabetic participants when compared to mostly standers (Fig. 2). Prolonged occupational sitting participants who were women, non-smoking, BMI: 18.5–24.9 kg/m2, overweight, non-diabetes and low or fully active had a lower risk of ESRD compared to mostly standing participants although this was not statistically significant.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Adjusted ESRD hazard ratios for the prolonged occupational sitters compared with the mostly standers, by age, sex, smoking, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes, and physical activity amounts. ESRD End-stage renal disease

Full size image

Comparing the joint effects of prolonged sitting and physical inactivity on ESRD risk, inactive prolonged sitters had a 34% increased risk of ESRD compared to active mostly standers (HR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.04, 1.73). However, the risk decreased for low-active or fully active prolonged sitters (low-active prolonged sitters: HR: 1.20, 95% CI 0.91, 1.58; fully active prolonged sitters: HR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.79, 1.34) (Table 4).

Table 4 A joint effect of occupational sedentary status and physical inactivity on risk of ESRD
Full size table

Discussions

The results of this study indicate the association of prolonged occupational sitting with the spectrum of kidney disease, including CKD, ESRD, and mortality due to kidney disease. Compared with mostly standers, prolonged occupational sitters had a higher risk of proteinuria (trace or above), CKD, and low eGFR. Furthermore, prolonged occupational sitters had a higher risk of ESRD, kidney-disease-related mortality, cardiovascular disease mortality, and diabetes mortality compared with mostly standers. Prolonged occupational sitting was consistently associated with a higher risk of dialysis in smokers, hypertensive and diabetic participants. The joint-effect analysis showed that inactive prolonged sitters had an even higher risk of ESRD compared with active mostly standers. In addition, greater physical activity was associated with a significantly lower kidney risk.

The results show that prolonged occupational sitting is associated with the spectrum of kidney diseases, especially for the development of ESRD and kidney-disease-related mortality. Our results are comparable with those of previous studies. A study conducted in Japan explored the amount of time elderly people spend being sedentary and the risk of lower eGFR [7]. Another study from Japan, also found that a 60 min increase in sedentary behavior, measured by an accelerometer, was associated with lower eGFR (< 60 versus ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) in women [21]. Elderly individuals who were sedentary and sat for more than 8 hours per day had a higher rate of low eGFR than those who sat for less than 4 hours per day (OR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.02, 1.37) [7]. The risk was similar for the mostly sitting group in the present study (OR: 1.46, 95% CI 1.38, 1.56). Another study, also conducted in Japan but focused on middle-age individuals (20–64 years old), found that for male participants, occupational sedentary behavior was related to proteinuria (1+ or more) (OR: 1.35, 95% CI 1.11, 1.63) [6]. Males in our study demonstrated a similar risk of proteinuria (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02, 1.46). However, the definition of proteinuria in our study is trace proteinuria or above, which is similar to microalbuminuria (albuminuria–creatinine ratio 10–29 mg/g) [22]. This means prolonged occupational sitting was associated with early stages of kidney damage. We found that prolonged occupational sitting resulted in a slightly higher risk of low eGFR (OR: 1.46) than proteinuria (OR: 1.12). The analysis of those with two visits revealed a higher risk of lower eGFR (< 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) for prolonged occupational sitters compared to mostly standers (HR: 1.25). However, there was no difference in the risk of proteinuria for prolonged occupational sitters compared to mostly standers (HR: 0.94). Other studies have suggested that sedentary behavior is associated with lower eGFR [10] but not proteinuria [8].

Some studies have explored the relationship between sedentary behavior and CKD [5, 8, 10]. We also found that after adjustment for physical activity, prolonged occupational sitters showed an increased risk of CKD. We found the risk of CKD for prolonged sitters was 26% higher than mostly standers after controlling for different amounts of physical activity. In order to better confirm the causality of prolonged sitting for CKD, we included the outcomes for ESRD and kidney-related deaths. Because CKD patients may die from diseases other than kidney disease [23], such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes [24], we also included these causes of death. We found that prolonged sitters had a higher risk of ESRD and kidney mortality, CVD mortality, diabetes mortality, and all-cause mortality compared with mostly standers. Prior work has shown that individuals with kidney disease spend longer sitting than healthy individuals [25]. To avoid reverse causality [26], we conducted sensitivity analyses by excluding individuals undergoing dialysis within 2 years of follow-up and those with kidney disease (Appendix Table 8). These analyses support a causal relationship between sedentary behavior and kidney disease.

In this study, the ESRD risk for prolonged occupational sitters could be independent of physical activity. Both prolonged sitting and physical inactivity significantly increased the risk of ESRD. Inactive prolonged sitters had a 34% higher risk of ESRD than active non-sitters. Moreover, the risk decreased for prolonged occupational sitters if they were physically active. Prior studies have suggested that sedentary behavior and physical inactivity are two separate risk factors for all-cause and CVD mortality [27]. In the current study, both sedentary behaviors and physical inactivity increased the risk for CKD, ESRD, and mortality due to kidney disease. In the stratified analyses of several cardiovascular factors including smokers, hypertensive, diabetic, or participants who are overweight, prolonged sitting was consistently associated with a higher risk of dialysis. However, women had a relatively lower risk than men. Prior work has found that women have a lower risk from prolonged sitting than men and that this may be due to potential confounders [28]. It has been found that men store a greater proportion of total body fat as visceral fat, which is more associated with risks of chronic disease than gluteofemoral obesity [28]. However, some studies found that women are more at risk for developing the disease due to sedentary behavior [5, 29]. The gender difference for the ESRD risk of prolonged occupational sitting needs to be further investigated.

We also found that the ESRD risk for prolonged occupational sitters in participants who are overweight was marginally higher compared to the risk for mostly standers (HR: 1.22, 95% CI 0.98, 1.53). It is probably due to the risk of dialysis increased among participants who are overweight, and it may be affected by other confounders that are associated with being overweight [30]. Previous studies have suggested that prolonged sitters are at higher risks of obesity and diabetes [31,32,33]. Individuals who are overweight are more likely to have cardio-metabolic risk biomarkers [34]. In this cohort, we found that the risk of death due to diabetes was higher for sitters than non-sitters (Table 3) and that sitters were at greater risk for diabetes and being overweight (OR: 1.26, 95% CI 1.20, 1.32 for diabetes; OR: 1.15, 95% CI 1.12, 1.18 for overweight, Appendix Table 9). The risk of obesity and diabetes may play an important role in prolonged occupational sitters’ risk of ESRD and mortality due to kidney disease. The underlying reasons that sedentary behavior is harmful may be related to diseases such as cardiovascular disease [31, 35, 36]. In addition, it is well known that sedentary individuals tend to have increased blood level of neutral fat and decreased high-density cholesterol [37]. A 2012 study conducted in Australia found that sitting and watching TV after a meal results in higher blood sugar than standing or walking for 20 min [38]. The results of prior work suggested that engaging in one hour of exercise per day offsets the harm caused by a sedentary lifestyle [39]. We found that participants who were prolonged occupational sitters but met recommended physical activity guidelines or engaged in at least 90 min of moderate-intensity exercise per week (15 min per day) had an even lower risk of ESRD compared to physically inactive prolonged sitters.

Strengths and Limitations

This study has several strengths. First, with more than 20 years of follow-up and a large cohort, there were sufficient ESRD cases and mortality due to kidney disease to test the effect of prolonged occupational sitting. Second, the availability of data for confounders’ information such as physical activity allowed us to show the independent effects of prolonged sitting [17]. Third, sensitivity analyses that excluded those undergoing dialysis within 2 years allowed us to clarify the causal relationship between prolonged occupational sitting and kidney disease. Fourth, we were able to examine the whole spectrum of kidney disease for prolonged sitters by cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes. Lastly, this is one of only a few studies to investigate the association of lifestyle risk factors such as prolonged occupational sitting and physical activity with the risk of dialysis, which is important due to the growing incidence of dialysis globally and in Taiwan. Despite its strengths, this study had some limitations. First, prolonged occupational sitting and physical activity were self-reported and some recall bias could exist. However, many disease and mortality outcomes in this cohort have been shown to have a dose–response relationship with physical activity [17, 19]. Second, prolonged occupational sitting is derived from self-reported questionnaire in this study as occupational sedentary behavior, with four categorical sitting status at work instead of continuous data measured by an objective accelerometer. Third, the studied population was Asian from a self-paid health examination enterprise, and participants are likely to have a higher socioeconomic status than the general public.

Conclusion

In summary, after adjustment for physical activity, prolonged occupational sitting was associated with a higher risk of CKD, ESRD, and mortality due to kidney disease. Inactive prolonged sitters had a higher risk of ESRD than physically active, mostly standers. However, active prolonged sitters had decreased risk of ESRD compared to inactive prolonged sitters. During the COVID-19 pandemic, because of recommendations to stay home, the amount of time people spent time sitting increased by 28% [40]. The results of this study may be used to inform inactive prolonged sitters who work at home to engage in at least some physical activity (a minimal level of 90 min/week of moderate-intensity exercise) after spending an extended period of time sitting. Staying active and shortening the amount of time spent sitting may be important ways to lower the risk of the spectrum of kidney diseases.

Availability of Data and Materials

The Taiwan MJ Cohort is available to the worldwide research community and offers opportunities for collaboration. Those applying for data access should contact the MJ Health Research Foundation at http://www.mjhrf.org/.

Code Availability

Code used for study analyses may be made available upon reasonable request to the authors.

References

  1. Morris JN, Heady JA, Raffle PA, Roberts CG, Parks JW. Coronary heart-disease and physical activity of work. Lancet. 1953;262(6796):1111–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Paffenbarger RS Jr, Blair SN, Lee IM. A history of physical activity, cardiovascular health and longevity: the scientific contributions of Jeremy N Morris, DSc, DPH, FRCP. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30(5):1184–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ng SW, Popkin BM. Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe. Obes Rev. 2012;13(8):659–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(3):105–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bharakhada N, Yates T, Davies MJ, Wilmot EG, Edwardson C, Henson J, et al. Association of sitting time and physical activity with CKD: a cross-sectional study in family practices. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60(4):583–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fujii Y, Yamamoto R, Shinzawa M, Kimura Y, Aoki K, Tomi R, et al. Occupational sedentary behavior and prediction of proteinuria in young to middle-aged adults: a retrospective cohort study. J Nephrol. 2021;34(3):719–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S, Shimada H, Lee S, Makizako H, Doi T, Harada K, et al. Association between sedentary time and kidney function in community-dwelling elderly Japanese people. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(5):730–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martens RJH, van der Berg JD, Stehouwer CDA, Henry RMA, Bosma H, Dagnelie PC, et al. Amount and pattern of physical activity and sedentary behavior are associated with kidney function and kidney damage: The Maastricht Study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(4): e0195306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pike M, Taylor J, Kabagambe E, Stewart TG, Robinson-Cohen C, Morse J, et al. The association of exercise and sedentary behaviours with incident end-stage renal disease: the Southern Community Cohort Study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8): e030661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee J, Walker ME, Gabriel KP, Vasan RS, Xanthakis V. Associations of accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary time with chronic kidney disease: The Framingham Heart Study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6): e0234825.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Volaklis K, Mamadjanov T, Meisinger C. Sedentary behavior and kidney function in adults: a narrative review. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021;133(3–4):144–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  13. de Boer IH, Caramori ML, Chan JC, Heerspink HJ, Hurst C, Khunti K, et al. Kidney disease: improving global outcomes diabetes work G. KDIGO 2020 clinical practice guideline for diabetes management in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2020;98(4S):S1–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wen CP, Cheng TYD, Tsai MK, Chang YC, Chan HT, Tsai SP, et al. All-cause mortality attributable to chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study based on 462 293 adults in Taiwan. Lancet. 2008;371(9631):2173–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu HH, Kuo CF, Li IJ, Weng CH, Lee CC, Tu KH, et al. Family aggregation and heritability of ESRD in Taiwan: a population-based study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;70(5):619–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S498-504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wen CP, Wai JPM, Tsai MK, Yang YC, Cheng TYD, Lee M-C, et al. Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378(9798):1244–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu X, Tsai SP, Tsao CK, Chiu ML, Tsai MK, Lu PJ, et al. Cohort profile: the Taiwan MJ cohort: half a million Chinese with repeated health surveillance data. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(6):1744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang IK, Tsai MK, Liang CC, Yen TH, Huang CC, Wen SF, et al. The role of physical activity in chronic kidney disease in the presence of diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Am J Nephrol. 2013;38(6):509–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsushita K, Mahmoodi BK, Woodward M, Emberson JR, Jafar TH, Jee SH, et al. Comparison of risk prediction using the CKD-EPI equation and the MDRD study equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate. JAMA. 2012;307(18):1941–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasaki S, Nakamura K, Ukawa S, Okada E, Amagasa S, Inoue S, et al. Association of accelerometer-measured physical activity with kidney function in a Japanese population: the DOSANCO Health Study. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23(1):7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wen CP, Yang YC, Tsai MK, Wen SF. Urine dipstick to detect trace proteinuria: an underused tool for an underappreciated risk marker. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58(1):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson S, James M, Wiebe N, Hemmelgarn B, Manns B, Klarenbach S, et al. Cause of death in patients with reduced kidney function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(10):2504–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gansevoort RT, Correa-Rotter R, Hemmelgarn BR, Jafar TH, Heerspink HJ, Mann JF, et al. Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular risk: epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention. Lancet. 2013;382(9889):339–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Glavinovic T, Ferguson T, Komenda P, Rigatto C, Duhamel TA, Tangri N, et al. CKD and sedentary time: results from the Canadian health measures survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;72(4):529–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sattar N, Preiss D. Reverse causality in cardiovascular epidemiological research: More common than imagined? Circulation. 2017;135(24):2369–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Healy GN, Wijndaele K, Dunstan DW, Shaw JE, Salmon J, Zimmet PZ, et al. Objectively measured sedentary time, physical activity, and metabolic risk: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Diabetes Care. 2008;31(2):369–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lynch BM, White SL, Owen N, Healy GN, Chadban SJ, Atkins RC, et al. Television viewing time and risk of chronic kidney disease in adults: the AusDiab Study. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40(3):265–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Owen N, Armstrong T, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, et al. Associations of TV viewing and physical activity with the metabolic syndrome in Australian adults. Diabetologia. 2005;48(11):2254–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cooper RS. Which factors confound or modify the relationship between body weight and mortality? Int J Obes. 2008;32(3):S47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hu FB. Sedentary lifestyle and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Lipids. 2003;38(2):103–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Heinonen I, Helajarvi H, Pahkala K, Heinonen OJ, Hirvensalo M, Palve K, et al. Sedentary behaviours and obesity in adults: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(6):e002901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shields M, Tremblay MS. Sedentary behaviour and obesity. Health Rep. 2008;19(2):19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dempsey PC, Hadgraft NT, Winkler EAH, Clark BK, Buman MP, Gardiner PA, et al. Associations of context-specific sitting time with markers of cardiometabolic risk in Australian adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Credeur DP, Miller SM, Jones R, Stoner L, Dolbow DR, Fryer SM, et al. Impact of prolonged sitting on peripheral and central vascular health. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(2):260–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gilchrist SC, Howard VJ, Akinyemiju T, Judd SE, Cushman M, Hooker SP, et al. Association of sedentary behavior with cancer mortality in middle-aged and older US adults. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(8):1210–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Crichton GE, Alkerwi A. Physical activity, sedentary behavior time and lipid levels in the Observation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Luxembourg study. Lipids Health Dis. 2015;11(14):87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dunstan DW, Kingwell BA, Larsen R, Healy GN, Cerin E, Hamilton MT, et al. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(5):976–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. The Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1302–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wedig IJ, Duelge TA, Elmer SJ. Infographic. Stay physically active during COVID-19 with exercise as medicine. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(6):346–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All or part of the data used in this research were authorized by, and received from, MJ Health Research Foundation (Authorization Code: MJHRFB2014001C). Any interpretation or conclusion described in this paper does not represent the views of MJ Health Research Foundation. MJ Health Survey Database and MJ BioData were available from the MJ Health Research Foundation Web site: http://www.mjhrf.org. We also thank the Data Science Center of the Ministry of Health and Welfare for providing administrative support.

Funding

Wayne Gao has received research funding: TMU110-AE1-B06 and TMU110-6216-003-111 from Taipei Medical University, MOST111-2314-B-038-044 from the Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan, and DP2-111-21121-01-O-12 from the Ministry of Education Taiwan. Prof. Chi Pang Wen's contribution to this study is supported, in part, by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial Center (MOHW110-TDU-B-212-124004). The funding source had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, No. 17, Xu-Zhou Road, Taipei, 10055, Taiwan

    Min-Kuang Tsai & Kuo-Liong Chien

  2. PhD Program in Global Health and Health Security, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Min-Kuang Tsai & Wayne Gao

  3. The Southeast Permanente Medical Group, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Chin-Kun Baw

  4. Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, No. 35, Keyan Road, Zhunan Town, Miaoli, 35053, Taiwan

    Chih-Cheng Hsu & Chi-Pang Wen

  5. China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Chi-Pang Wen

Authors
  1. Min-Kuang Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wayne Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kuo-Liong Chien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chin-Kun Baw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chih-Cheng Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chi-Pang Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KLC, CPW, and MKT were responsible for the study concept and design. MKT analyzed the data and drafted the first manuscript. MKT, WG, KLC, CKB, CCH, and CPW critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors gave the final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kuo-Liong Chien or Chi-Pang Wen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethical reviews were approved by the China Medical University. All participants provided consent prior to inclusion in this study. Data related to individual identification were removed and remained anonymous during the entire study process. All de-indefinable data analyses were conducted at the Data Science Center of the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan.

Consent for Publication

The authors confirm that human research participants provided informed consent for the publication of the data presented in this study.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9; Fig. 3.

Table 5 Distribution of occupational sedentary status for the participants with two visits
Full size table
Table 6 ESRD risk by occupational sedentary status for the participants with two visits
Full size table
Table 7 Incident risk of chronic kidney disease, proteinuria, and lower eGFR for the participants with two visits by occupational sedentary status
Full size table
Table 8 ESRD risk by occupational sedentary status, excluding participants who underwent dialysis or a had a kidney transplant within the first 2 years of follow-up or with CKD stage 5 (eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Full size table
Table 9 Diabetes and overweight risk by occupational sedentary status
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Flowchart of participants with baseline (first visit) and the second visit

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, MK., Gao, W., Chien, KL. et al. Associations of Prolonged Occupational Sitting with the Spectrum of Kidney Disease: Results from a Cohort of a Half-Million Asian Adults. Sports Med - Open 8, 147 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00542-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00542-8

Keywords

  • Prolonged occupational sitting
  • Physical activity
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • End-stage renal disease
  • Cohort