- Review Article
- Open access
- Published:
Comparing the Impacts of Testosterone and Exercise on Lean Body Mass, Strength and Aerobic Fitness in Aging Men
Sports Medicine - Open volume 10, Article number: 30 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Based on the largely untested premise that it is a restorative hormone that may reverse the detrimental impacts of aging, prescription of testosterone (T) has increased in recent decades despite no new clinical indications. It is apparent that middle-aged and older men with low-normal serum T levels are considering T supplementation as an anti-aging strategy. At the same time, there is evidence that physical activity (PA) is at historical lows in the Western world. In this review, we compare the impacts of T treatment aimed at achieving physiological T concentrations in middle-aged and older men, alongside the impacts of ecologically relevant forms of exercise training. The independent, and possible combined, effects of T and exercise therapy on physiological outcomes such as aerobic fitness, body composition and muscular strength are addressed.
Main Body
Our findings suggest that both T treatment and exercise improve lean body mass in healthy older men. If improvement in lean body mass is the primary aim, then T treatment could be considered, and the combination of T and exercise may be more beneficial than either in isolation. In terms of muscle strength in older age, an exercise program is likely to be more beneficial than T treatment (where the dose is aimed at achieving physiological concentrations), and the addition of such T treatment does not provide further benefit beyond that of exercise alone. For aerobic fitness, T at doses aimed at achieving physiological concentrations has relatively modest impacts, particularly in comparison to exercise training, and there is limited evidence as to additive effects. Whilst higher doses of T, particularly by intramuscular injection, may have larger impacts on lean body mass and strength, this must be balanced against potential risks.
Conclusion
Knowing the impacts of T treatment and exercise on variables such as body composition, strength and aerobic fitness extends our understanding of the relative benefits of physiological and pharmacological interventions in aging men. Our review suggests that T has impacts on strength, body composition and aerobic fitness outcomes that are dependent upon dose, route of administration, and formulation. T treatment aimed at achieving physiological T concentrations in middle-aged and older men can improve lean body mass, whilst exercise training enhances lean body mass, aerobic fitness and strength. Men who are physically able to exercise safely should be encouraged to do so, not only in terms of building lean body mass, strength and aerobic fitness, but for the myriad health benefits that exercise training confers.
Background
Testosterone (T) is the primary male sex hormone responsible for sexual development and virilization. It plays an important role in maintenance of bone and muscle, libido, and sperm production. As men grow older T concentrations can decline, with some studies reporting that T levels decrease at a rate of 1–2% per year from the third decade of life onwards [1, 2]. Ageing occurs continuously and defining youth, middle and older ages are societal as well as physiological constructs, with somewhat arbitrary thresholds. The UK Biobank focussed on adults aged 40–69 years [3], in keeping with the European Male Ageing Study of men aged 40–70 years [4]; whereas studies such as the Health In Men Study (HIMS) [5] and the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project (CHAMP) [6] investigated T in men aged 70 years and above. Therefore, for the purposes of this review, we define young men as aged < 40 years, middle-aged men as aged 40–69 years, and older men as aged ≥ 70 years. Older men, on average, have lower T concentrations compared to younger men [5, 7, 8]. In 394 healthy men aged 71–87 years, the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles for T measured using mass spectrometry were 6.4–25.6 nmol/L, compared to 10.4–30.1 nmol/L in reproductively normal men aged 21–35 years [5, 7]. Within any age stratum, there is considerable variation in T values between individual men [9]. Evidence of impaired testicular production of T is apparent after the age of 70 years [10, 11].
The age-related decline in T concentrations coincides with accumulation of medical comorbidities [12, 13], and with reductions in aerobic fitness and strength and unfavourable changes in body composition [14,15,16]. It is, however, important to note that T concentrations are higher in older men who engage in a healthy lifestyle, inclusive of regular exercise [17]. Men with organic disorders of the hypothalamus, pituitary or testes which impair the production of T present with symptoms and signs of androgen deficiency [18]. Such men typically have T concentrations lower than expected in healthy men of comparable age, and their symptoms and signs of androgen deficiency respond promptly to treatment with T. However, older men with T concentrations appropriate for their age but lower than expected for younger men, may exhibit non-specific symptoms such as tiredness and fatigue, in the absence of hypothalamic, pituitary or testicular disease.
In the USA, T prescriptions increased 11-fold between 2001 and 2011, largely in middle-aged to older men, in the absence of new medical indications [19]. Although prescriptions have subsequently decreased [20,21,22], it is nonetheless apparent that some middle-aged and older men with low-normal serum T levels are considering T supplementation as an anti-aging strategy [23]. At the same time, there is evidence that physical activity is at historical lows in the Western world [24]. There has never been a more inactive population than twenty-first century humans and some have suggested that, from an evolutionary perspective, this unprecedented decline in physical activity underlies the contemporary increase in chronic diseases [25]. Despite the fact that there is a mature evidence-base that exercise training can arrest some age-associated changes in body composition, strength and cardiovascular function in humans, increasing physical activity remains a population health challenge, and pharmacological strategies that emulate the impacts of exercise present an appealing alternative [26].
This review summarizes what is currently known about the impact of T treatment, exercise and their combination on body composition, strength and aerobic fitness. Although there is a body of literature concerning the effects of anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) abuse, this review focuses on (physiological) T treatment, designed to increase T levels within the physiological range in middle and older aged men. The papers we review to provide the following summary sections are available as an online supplement. We also present the consolidated outcomes of the recent Testosterone and Exercise (TEX) randomised trial [27,28,29], a 2 × 2 factorial placebo-controlled trial of men aged 50–70 years with low-normal serum T levels who were randomized to directly compare the combined and independent impacts of T treatment (in the physiological range) and supervised center-based exercise.
Main Text
Lean Body Mass: The Effects of Testosterone, Exercise, and Their Combination
Building muscle mass is arguably a primary driver for off-label T use. Lean body mass decreases from middle age at a rate of approximately 1% per year [30], with its decline associated with decreased independence, reduced quality of life and, ultimately, frailty and an increased risk of mortality [31]. The anabolic effects of T are well established, with mechanisms related to increased muscle protein synthesis [32, 33], stimulated satellite cell replication [34] and inhibition of muscle protein degradation [35, 36]. Whilst illicit anabolic–androgenic steroid (AAS) use is beyond the scope of this review, the anabolic actions of T are relevant to middle-to-older aged men who may experience muscle loss as they age, with consequent detrimental effects on health [31]. Similarly, exercise training has been shown to stimulate muscle hypertrophy in middle and older aged men [37,38,39,40,41], although these studies also used some dietary manipulations. Taken together, this suggests the combination of T treatment and exercise training may confer additive benefits for lean body mass and some studies described below have directly addressed this question.
The Impact of Testosterone on Lean Body Mass
Cross-sectional studies have associated higher endogenous T levels with higher lean body mass [42,43,44,45,46,47] and the majority of interventional studies in older men have reported that T improves lean body mass (Additional file 1: Table S1, mean effect across studies ~ 2.2 kg) [35, 48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. A study by Bhasin et al. [56] demonstrated that older men (60–75 years, n = 60) appeared to be as responsive as younger men (19–35 years, n = 61) to the anabolic effects of T treatment, assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) [56]. In older adults (≥ 65 years), an ‘umbrella review’ concluded that T administration was justified as a pharmacological intervention in men with low baseline T levels (6.9–10.4 nmol/L) to improve muscle mass [61]. It is pertinent to note that this review was not powered to assess any potential cardiovascular (CV) or cancer risks of T treatment in men and the use of T is still only indicated clinically for men with pathological androgen deficiency (disorders of the hypothalamus, pituitary or testes) [18, 62]. However, given the extensive evidence of the anabolic effects of T, coupled with the known association of low muscle mass and all-cause mortality in men [63], these findings may have important implications for men with reduced muscle mass resulting from their inability to exercise due to disease or disability.
The Impact of Exercise Training on Lean Body Mass
There is a plethora of evidence demonstrating that exercise training can increase lean muscle mass across the lifespan, and in various disease states [64,65,66,67,68,69,70]. Given its association with all-cause mortality [31], maintaining or improving muscle mass becomes increasingly important into middle and older age [71]. Specifically in middle/older aged men (50–76 years), resistance training studies of 12–16 weeks report average lean body mass improvements of ~ 1.3 kg [37,38,39,40,41]. This result is in line with a meta-analysis by Peterson et al. [64] comprising 49 studies representing 1328 participants who were > 50 years. The authors concluded from their analysis that 20.5 weeks of resistance exercise training elicits an approximate 1.1 kg increase in lean body mass among older adults. It is important to note that the meta-analysis also included women, although sex was not significantly associated with the changes reported in lean body mass.
The Impact of Combined Testosterone and Exercise Training on Lean Body Mass
A recent meta-analysis by Falqueto et al. [72] reported that the combination of T treatment and exercise training (duration 3–52 weeks) resulted in greater improvements in lean body mass compared to exercise training alone. However, of the 27 included studies (n = 1114) only one (n = 24) [73] was performed in healthy adult men, with the remainder involving clinical populations such as those with heart failure [74, 75], kidney failure [76], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [77, 78], and spinal cord injury [79]. This highlights the paucity of data surrounding the effects of T and exercise training on aging in apparently healthy men, without major medical comorbidities.
Intervention studies in younger men report an additive effect on lean body mass when T treatment is combined with exercise training (Additional file 1: Table S2) [80,81,82]. Bhasin et al. [80] reported that, when 10 weeks of strength training was combined with higher doses (600 mg given intramuscularly on a weekly basis) of T in 43 men aged 19–40 years, lean body mass increased significantly (+ 6.1 kg) compared to men in the no-exercise groups (T alone: + 3.2 kg; placebo alone: + 0.8 kg). Exercise alone resulted in average lean body mass gains of 1.9 kg [80]. In men of similar age (n = 21, 19–45 years), Giorgi et al. [82] combined a supraphysiological T dose (3.5 mg/kg bodyweight weekly) with strength training over 12 weeks and reported significantly greater rectus femoris girth in the T + Ex group, compared with placebo. Similarly, a recent study by Pasiakos et al. [81] found that lean body mass improvements in young males (25 ± 5 years, n = 50) were significantly greater in those who received weekly T injections, compared to placebo (T + Ex: + 2.5 kg; P + Ex: -0.3 kg), after both groups completed 28 days of military-relevant exercise with a diet-induced energy deficit. The combination of T + Ex therefore appears to be additive for younger men with the magnitude of benefit ranging from ~ 2–5 kg over 10–12 weeks when supraphysiological doses are employed.
Studies assessing whether the addition of T treatment to an exercise training program in older men provides greater benefits for lean body mass than placebo have reported inconsistent results (Additional file 1: Table S2) [83,84,85,86,87]. Sullivan et al. [84] and Kvorning et al. [83] reported no additive effect of T + Ex on lean body mass following a 12-week resistance training intervention in older hypogonadal men. Further, Katznelson et al. [86] reported an absence of body composition change in either T treatment or exercise groups, or their combination, following a 12-week home-based Theraband exercise program. Conversely, in a group of healthy older men with low-normal T levels, Hildreth et al. [85] reported that the addition of T treatment to progressive resistance exercise training for 12 months led to greater improvements in lean body mass than exercise alone. Similarly, Barnouin et al. [87] reported the addition of T treatment to a lifestyle intervention provided superior lean body mass results to placebo in obese men (n = 83, > 65 years). Of note, in the Barnouin et al. [87] study, the addition of T treatment only attenuated the loss of lean body mass compared to placebo; lean body mass itself was not increased. Only one of the aforementioned studies employed a combined resistance and aerobic training program, which can be as effective as resistance training alone for improving lean body mass [88]. However, the lifestyle intervention in that study was also inclusive of caloric restriction (500–750 kcal/day deficit) which undoubtedly affected lean body mass.
In our recent 2 × 2 factorial trial comparing the impacts of T and exercise (TEX) [27,28,29], we randomised 80 men aged 50–70 years with waist girth ≥ 95 cm and low-normal serum T levels to transdermal T, or matching placebo (P) and to supervised center-based exercise training (Ex) or no additional exercise (NEx) [T + Ex group mean(95%CI) T levels nmol/L: 12.9(10.7–15.0); T + Nex 11.0(8.6–13.3); P + Ex 12.3(9.9–14.7); P + Nex 13.0(10.9–15.2)]. Post-intervention changes in T concentration were significant in the T treatment groups [T + Ex group 15.9(13.8–18.1); T + Nex 14.0(11.7–16.4)], but not in the placebo groups [P + Ex 13.2(10.6–15.7); P + Nex 12.1(9.9–14.3)]. The exercise intervention involved circuits of eight machine-based resistance exercises (leg press, chest press, seated calf raise, lat pulldown, leg curl, dual biceps curl, abdominal crunch, and triceps extension), alternated with eight aerobic cycling stations. Exercises were performed for 45 s, with 15-s intervals to facilitate movement between stations in the circuit. Resistance exercise intensity (2 sets of 12–15 reps, progressed to 3 sets at week 3) was initially performed at 65%1RM, progressed to 80% 1RM by weeks 4–6. Aerobic exercise was initially performed at 65% HRmax, progressed to 85%HRmax by weeks 4–6 on the cycle ergometer. Transdermal doses of T have to allow for limited absorption from normal skin, and in the absence of a depot tend to be given daily (46). The dose of T (100 mg applied to the upper body daily) was designed to raise T levels from low-normal to mid- or high-normal range in these participants, rather than to raise levels above the physiological range. We observed main effects of T treatment with increased total, leg and arm lean body mass (assessed by DXA) [28], thereby reinforcing the anabolic effects of T (see Fig. 2). Furthermore, we observed that T alone significantly increased leg lean body mass (+ 0.5 kg/2.3%) compared to placebo alone (− 0.4 kg/− 1.9%) over 12 weeks [28]. Given that muscle mass in the lower extremities is an important determinant of mobility status with aging [89, 90], our results may have implications for older men unable to exercise due to disease or disability. The 0.7 kg (1.1%) increase in total lean body mass in the exercise alone group was marginally lower than that reported (1.1 kg) in a meta-analysis of resistance exercise training studies in 1328 participants > 50 years [64], perhaps reflecting the shorter duration of our TEX study (12 weeks). Furthermore, our exercise intervention consisted of both aerobic and resistance training, making direct comparisons with the above meta-analysis difficult. Our findings are in agreement with previous T [35, 48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60] and exercise [37,38,39,40,41] studies in men as we report significant main effects of T (alone) and exercise (alone) to improve total lean body mass. Although we did not observe additive effects of T treatment and exercise to improve total lean body mass, we did observe that the combination had additive effects in specific regions (e.g. leg and arm lean body mass). Furthermore, the increase in total lean body mass was largest in men who received both T and exercise training [28]. Further studies are needed to examine this question, and to determine the effects of longer durations of these interventions.
Summary: Effects of Testosterone, Exercise, and Their Combination on Lean Body Mass
There is clear evidence that both T treatment and exercise improve lean body mass in healthy older men (Fig. 1). If improvement in lean body mass is the primary aim, then T supplementation could be considered, and the combination of T and exercise may be more beneficial than either in isolation (Figs. 1 and 2). However, the effects of T (and exercise) should be reviewed in the overall context of cardiovascular risk (see section below: Are There Cardiovascular Risks Associated With Testosterone Treatment?). Men who are physically able to exercise safely should be encouraged to do so, not only in terms of building lean body mass but for the myriad of other health benefits exercise training offers [91,92,93]. Finally, it has been reported that increases in skeletal muscle mass as a result of T treatment may be dose-dependent [50, 52, 56, 94, 95]. It is therefore of interest in our TEX study, that despite a much lower (physiological) T dose delivered in older participants, we observed improvements in lean body mass.
Muscular Strength: The Effects of Testosterone, Exercise, and Their Combination
Although inter-related, a change in lean body mass is not always an indicator of functional (strength) change [96, 97] (and vice versa), and there are inconsistent reports regarding the association of the increase in lean body mass following T treatment and changes in muscular strength and performance [49, 51, 53, 55, 98]. It has been reported that a decline in muscular strength is more indicative of functional decline than decrease in muscle mass [99]. Loss of muscular strength with increasing age is associated with decreases in function, the ability to conduct activities of daily living, and independence [100, 101]. Consequently, low muscle strength also independently predicts all-cause mortality in men [102,103,104,105], making it a pertinent outcome to assess in middle to older aged men.
The Impact of Testosterone on Muscular Strength
Data from cross-sectional comparisons suggest that lower endogenous T levels may be associated with lower levels of muscular strength in younger [106], middle aged [107] and older [108] men. However, data from interventional studies in older men are less conclusive, possibly due to differences in study duration, or T dose and/or route of administration (see Additional file 1: Table S3). Some T intervention studies in older men have reported no difference in muscular strength between T-treated and placebo groups [49, 51, 53, 55, 58, 109,110,111,112,113]. In contrast, other studies of T treatment alone (i.e. no exercise intervention) have reported improvements in strength [35, 48, 52, 57, 59, 98, 114, 115]. However, of the studies that have reported improvements in muscular strength, one did not include a control group [52], three reported only hand-grip measurements as a surrogate of strength [57, 98, 115], three were limited by small sample sizes (n < 12 per group) [35, 59, 114], and another was conducted in older frail men [48]. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 1083 males aged 50–78 years across 29 RCTs reported only a small effect size of 0.3 for dominant knee extension and hand-grip strength [116]. In contrast, a more recent meta-analysis of 41 RCTs in middle-aged and older men reported a large effect size of 0.9 for total body strength following T treatment [117]. The authors also concluded that studies employing intramuscular T injection resulted in an 11.2% increase of total body strength, in comparison to transdermal preparations, which improved strength by 2.1%.
Is an Increase in Strength Following Testosterone Treatment Dose-Dependent?
Given that T intervention studies employ a range of doses, Bhasin et al. [56] used a long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to suppress endogenous T secretion and assessed responses to five different doses of T (ranging from 25 to 600 mg/wk) over five months to determine T dose–response relationships in younger (19–35 years, n = 61) and older (60–75 years, n = 60) men. Dose-dependent increases in leg press strength were elicited in both younger and older men, with no effect of age [56]. These results highlighted that older men were as responsive as younger men (age effect: P = 0.84) to the beneficial effects of T on strength (assessed via leg press). In addition, the authors concluded the best ‘trade-off’ was achieved with a T dose of 125 mg per week given intramuscularly when improvements in lean body mass, muscle strength and frequency of adverse events were taken into consideration. Although perhaps unsurprising, it is important to note that, following cessation of T treatment, muscular strength levels may not be maintained (unless otherwise targeted) [118], and the rate of strength loss may be correlated with the length of the antecedent T administration period [82].
The Impact of Exercise on Strength
Low muscle strength is independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, independent of muscle mass [119]. However, the effect of resistance training on muscular strength in older adults is well established [120, 121] and supported by the highest category of evidence [122, 123]. A systematic review of 41 progressive resistance strength training trials in older adults (n = 1955) reported a moderate-to-large beneficial effect on strength (0.68) [124]. These results were later reinforced by a Cochrane review of 73 trials comprising 3059 older adults which demonstrated that progressive resistance training has a large effect (0.84) on muscle strength [121]. Further, a meta-analysis of 47 studies representing 1079 participants reported that older adults can achieve substantial muscular strength gains in major muscle groups (24–29% improvement across leg press, chest press, knee extension and latissimus-pulldown exercises) following resistance training [120].
Can Exercise Training Modify Age-Related Decline in Strength?
A reduction in size and number of muscle fibres, specifically in type II (fast-twitch) fibres, underpins age-associated strength decreases [125]. The selective atrophy of type II muscle fibres with age decreases the maximum relaxation rate [126], which can be ascribed to decreased sarcoplasmic reticulum activity and reduced sliding speed of actin on myosin [127, 128]. A gradual decrease in the number of muscle fibres begins during the 5th decade of life with an approximate 50% reduction by 80 years [129]. However, a slowing of this process is evident in those who remain physically active into older age—e.g. masters athletes [130, 131]. There is also evidence to show that six months of strength training in elderly men can induce lower limb strength increases similar in relative terms to men 30 years their junior (40 year old increase: 22% vs 70 year old increase: 21%).
Although a portion of the age-related decline in strength may be related to muscle mass, there is also evidence to suggest that neural processes play a role. Specifically, motor unit losses of 47% have been reported in older (60–81 years) compared to younger (22–38 years) participants [132]. Although some will atrophy, denervated muscle fibres may also be adopted by other surviving motor neurons, resulting in larger motor units [133]. Whether chronic exercise training can delay the decrease in motor unit numbers associated with aging remains unclear [134, 135].
The Impact of Combined Testosterone Treatment and Exercise Training on Strength
Intervention studies combining T treatment and exercise have produced heterogenous results in terms of muscular strength outcomes, which may be attributed to distinct T doses, routes of administration and/or exercise training programs (see Additional file 1: Table S4). The combination of supraphysiological T doses and resistance exercise training has been shown to increase muscular strength more than exercise alone following 10–12-week interventions in healthy young men (aged 19–45 years) [80, 82]. Specifically, using 600 mg/wk intramuscular injections, Bhasin et al. [80] reported increases in 1RM of 38% in the T + Ex group compared to those that performed exercise alone (11%). In this study, serum T levels in the T + Ex group increased from 14.9 ± 1.3 at baseline to 112.5 ± 10.6 nmol/L. Similarly, Giorgi et al. [82] administered 3.5 mg/kg/wk injections (average bodyweight: 83 kg = 290 mg/wk) and reported increases of 22% and 9% in the T + Ex and P + Ex groups respectively (changes in T levels were not reported). Collectively these studies suggest the addition of supraphysiological T treatment to exercise training over 12 weeks improves the benefit of exercise alone by ~ 2–threefold. In contrast, another study of men aged 18–39 years by Pasiakos et al. [81] failed to show any difference in lower body muscular strength changes between T (200 mg/wk) and placebo groups after 28 days of military-relevant exercise. They observed changes in T from 15.5 to 36.2 nmol/L in the T group during this time. However, direct comparisons between Pasiakos et al. [81] and the earlier studies from Bhasin et al. [80] and Giorgi et al. [82] are difficult, as all participants from Pasiakos et al. [81] also underwent a severe (55%) energy deficit (diet and exercise induced) which likely affected muscular strength improvements. It is also important to highlight that the exercise training regime implemented by Pasiakos et al. was relatively short (28 days) and primarily aerobic-based to “reflect the aerobic-type physical work that occurs during sustained, strenuous military operations”, which may account for the lack of lower body muscular strength improvement reported.
Studies combining T treatment and exercise training in older men with low-normal baseline T levels have failed to show additive muscular strength benefits over 3–12 months (Additional file 1: Table S4) [83,84,85, 87]. Sullivan et al. [84] reported a trend toward greater strength improvement in 1RM bench press with T (100 mg injections) over 12 weeks in 71 men aged 65–93 years but these results did not achieve statistical significance. Of note, although significantly greater increases in mid-thigh cross-sectional area were reported for T + Ex, this did not translate into greater strength improvements in 1RM leg press, reinforcing the distinction between lean body mass and strength improvements. Kvorning et al. [83] also failed to show any additional benefit of adding 50 mg of transdermal T (gel) to 12 weeks of strength training in a smaller study (T + Ex: n = 6, P + Ex: n = 8) of men aged 60–78 years. In a 12-month study of 167 men > 60 years by Hildreth et al. [85], the addition of T to supervised progressive resistance training did not significantly affect any 1RM strength measures. Of note however, the improvement in upper body strength in the non-exercisers was significantly greater in those randomised to T, compared to placebo. In line with these results, Barnouin et al. [87] also failed to show any significant 1RM strength differences between T and placebo in 83 obese men (> 65 years, body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m2) when both groups also engaged in a lifestyle intervention inclusive of caloric restriction and exercise training.
All studies in middle-aged and older men have employed training programs that were predominantly resistance-based. However, interventions that are specifically designed to target both aerobic and muscular components of health may be more beneficial than either modality in isolation, particularly for improvement in tasks of daily living [88, 136]. Contrary to widely held belief, endurance trained older men (70–81 years) also have preserved strength characteristics relative to body mass [131]. In the TEX study which involved combined resistance and endurance training, we did not observe any main effects of T on strength measures [28] (Fig. 2). As muscular strength responses to T may be dose-dependent [56] and further influenced by route of administration [117], we cannot exclude the possibility that a higher dose, alternate route of T administration, or longer treatment may have yielded different results. Conversely, we reported main effects of exercise training which increased all strength measures [28]. These findings suggest that the addition of T (targeting physiological levels) to an exercise program might not provide further benefit in terms of muscular strength than exercise alone. This indicates that middle and older aged men with low T levels are likely to benefit from an exercise program targeted at improving muscular strength, which in turn would be expected to slow age-related declines in function and preserve ability to conduct activities of daily living independently [100, 101]. Although our results indicated a potential additive effect of T and exercise on lean body mass (Fig. 2), this did not translate into strength gains, which is in line with some previous literature.
Summary: Effects of Exercise Training and Testosterone on Strength in Middle and Older Aged Men
The likelihood of detecting significant differences in strength between T treatment and placebo tends to rise only if the dose is > 125 mg/wk (usually delivered via intramuscular injection). Studies that have used lower doses or different formulations have typically failed to report significant T effects. The literature concerning the effects of exercise training on muscular strength in older men is more homogeneous; exercise training improves muscular strength in healthy middle aged and older men. There is evidence to suggest that the addition of supraphysiological T treatment to an exercise training program is ~ 2–3 × more beneficial for muscular strength than placebo in men. However, it should be emphasized that important clinical concerns have been raised regarding the use of supraphysiological T doses in older men [56] (see section below: Are There Cardiovascular Risks Associated With Testosterone Treatment?), and no study (including TEX) has replicated this finding using doses of T that target the physiological range. For men motivated to maintain/build muscle strength into older age, an exercise program is likely to be more beneficial than exogenous T treatment. The addition of physiological T treatment does not appear to provide any benefit beyond that of exercise alone.
Aerobic Capacity: Effects of Testosterone, Exercise, and Their Combination
Exercise capacity provides an index of integrative human functional capacity which predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [137,138,139]. Every 1 metabolic equivalent improvement in aerobic fitness is associated with 15% and 19% lower risk of all-cause and CVD mortality respectively [140]. With aging, aerobic fitness tends to decline, with decreases of 15–20% reported in men during the fifth and sixth decades of life [15].
The Impact of Testosterone Treatment on Aerobic Fitness
Short-term T supplementation has been shown to improve total exercise time in men with coronary artery disease [141, 142], and also to improve VO2peak in men with heart failure [143]. However, longer-term T studies (6–24 months) in men without CVD have reported heterogeneous results concerning measures of peak aerobic exercise performance (see Additional file 1: Table S5) [111, 112, 144,145,146]. In a group of 64 mobility-limited, older men (65–86 years), Storer et al. [144] reported a significant difference in aerobic capacity between T treatment and placebo groups following six months of 100 mg daily transdermal T supplementation. Although the relative increase in VO2peak with T treatment was modest (0.83 mL/kg/min), the significant between-group difference was attributed to the greater than expected decline in the placebo group (− 0.89 mL/kg/min). These findings were reinforced by a later study by Traustadottir et al. [145] who reported that 3 years of 75 mg daily transdermal T treatment attenuated the expected age-related decline that was observed in the placebo group (average 3-year decrease, 0.88 mL/kg/min). In line with these findings, Blackman et al. [112] reported a significant difference between T (biweekly 100 mg injection) and placebo groups in men aged 65–88 years (n = 38) following a six-month intervention. In contrast to these studies, Nair et al. [146] concluded that there was no significant difference in aerobic capacity between the T and placebo groups after 2 years of T treatment (5 mg transdermal patch per day) in ~ 58 older men. However, in this study, the median VO2 peak data at baseline were 40.7 and 40.4 mL/kg/min (in the T and placebo groups respectively) which places these men at the 90th percentile for males aged between 60 and 69 years [147]. It is conceivable that these high VO2peak levels at baseline may have precluded the study’s capacity to demonstrate improvement [148]. It is also important to note that the T dose administered in the Nair et al. [146] trial was modest (5 mg) and that the same (5 mg transdermal patch) dose was used by Giannoulis et al. [111] who also failed to report any significant difference between T and placebo groups following a 6-month intervention in 43 men aged 65–80 years. Taken together, these studies in healthy middle-aged and older men suggest moderate effects of T to improve aerobic capacity, with subtle between-group differences contributed to by the decline observed in placebo groups (Additional file 1: Table S5).
Mechanisms Linking Testosterone and Aerobic Fitness
The mechanistic pathways by which T affects VO2peak are not yet fully understood and are likely multifactorial. T treatment in men has been associated with improved oxygen delivery and utilization through increases in hemoglobin [149], muscle capillarisation [150], and size of type I muscle fibres [151]. Of note, both younger and older men have been shown to increase red cell mass in a dose-dependent manner following 20 weeks of T treatment [149]. Given O2 transport capacity correlates directly with aerobic performance [152], it is surprising that there is no conclusive evidence regarding the effect of T treatment for improving VO2peak in middle-to-older aged men with low-normal serum T levels, and hence new RCTs are required.
The Impact of Exercise Training on Aerobic Fitness
In apparently healthy middle aged and older men, studies assessing the impact of exercise training on VO2peak report improvements of 10–32% following 2–12 months of exercise training [153,154,155,156,157,158]. Improvements in VO2peak following exercise training may arise from central and/or peripheral adaptation. Centrally, modifications in cardiac structure and function [159,160,161] and heart rate have been reported following exercise training. Peripherally, improvements in skeletal muscle structure and function [162, 163], mitochondrial density [164, 165], and decreased peripheral vascular resistance have also been identified as mediators that underpin improvements in oxygen delivery and utilization following exercise training [166,167,168,169,170,171]. A recent systematic review by Montero et al. [172] comprising 16 endurance training studies (total n = 153 primarily untrained healthy participants, 81% male, mean age 42–71 years) assessed the relative impact of changes in maximal cardiac output and arteriovenous oxygen (a-vO2) difference on maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max). The authors concluded that although both cardiac output and a-vO2 difference improved with exercise training, the improvement in VO2max was more attributable to the change in cardiac output, based on the linearity and strength of the relationship between the latter variables. Given that maximal HR is unchanged following exercise training, the increase in cardiac output following training derives from an increase in maximal stroke volume. Mechanisms responsible for the increased stroke volume may relate to enhanced left ventricular structure/function [160] and/or expanded blood volumes [173, 174].
Does the Combination of Exercise Training and Testosterone Have Additive Impacts on Aerobic Fitness?
Few interventional studies have assessed the effect of combining T treatment and exercise on functional capacity in healthy older men, or effects on a measure of functional capacity. In 167 healthy older (66 ± 5 years) men with low-normal T levels (7–12 nmol/L), Hildreth et al. [85] reported that neither T treatment, exercise, nor their combination, improved results in the six-minute walk test. However, the exercise intervention employed by Hildreth et al. [85] was predominantly resistance-based, which may have reduced the likelihood of observing improvements in aerobic measures [175]. In contrast, Barnouin et al. [87] reported that the addition of T treatment to a lifestyle intervention (caloric restriction and exercise training) significantly improved VO2peak compared to placebo (T: + 4.0 vs. P: + 2.9 mL/kg/min; T: + 0.42 vs. P: + 0.29 L/min) in older, obese, hypogonadal men with mild-moderate frailty (n = 83, > 65 years, BMI > 30 kg/m2, T < 10.4 nmol/L). However, the study by Barnouin et al. [87] did not include a control group, which prevents definitive conclusions regarding the impacts of T and exercise on aerobic fitness.
Consistent with previous literature, we recently observed that T treatment at a physiological dose did not influence changes in VO2peak in the T alone group [28] (i.e. no exercise intervention) (Fig. 2) [111, 112, 144,145,146]. In contrast, but also in line with previous research [153,154,155,156,157,158], we reported a 13% (3.2 mL/kg/min) increase in VO2peak in the exercise only group [28] and a 10% gain in the T + Ex group (2.5 mL/kg/min) (Fig. 2). These results highlight that exercise training is superior to T treatment for improving VO2peak in middle and older aged men with low-normal T levels. The significant main effect of exercise was also maintained when calculated in absolute terms (L/min).
Summary: Effects of Exercise and Testosterone on Aerobic Fitness
The literature to date suggests that differences between T and placebo groups are largely attributed to the prevention of time-related decline in placebo groups. In contrast, there is a mature evidence-base which supports the role of exercise in improving aerobic fitness. Our results [28], and others, suggest that the addition of T at a physiological dose neither increases nor diminishes the effect of exercise on VO2peak. Therefore, in order to improve aerobic capacity in middle-aged and older men, exercise training should be recommended and implemented. The addition of T treatment at a physiological dose does not appear to provide any benefit beyond that of exercise alone, at least over a short timeframe of intervention.
Are There Cardiovascular Risks Associated With Testosterone Treatment?
The literature reviewed in the preceding sections suggests that higher doses of T, particularly if delivered via intramuscular injection, may have larger effects on skeletal muscle. However, this must be balanced against the potential harms of T delivered at higher does than those required to achieve physiological concentrations. An RCT of transdermal T at relatively higher doses in 209 men aged 65 years and older with mobility limitations was discontinued due to an excess of broadly defined cardiovascular adverse events in the active treatment arm of the study [176]. However, a similar trial of transdermal T using conventional doses in 274 men aged 65 and older who were frail or intermediate-frail, found no increase in cardiovascular adverse events in T-treated men [48]. Contemporary meta-analyses of RCTs have not associated T treatment with increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events [177, 178]. In the Testosterone Trials (T Trials), a large RCT of 788 men aged 65 years and older randomised to T treatment or placebo for 12 months, 7 men in the T arm, and 7 in the placebo arm, experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event [179] (MACE, comprising myocardial infarction, stroke or death from cardiovascular causes). The cardiovascular sub-study of T Trials analysed 73 men from the T arm and 65 from the placebo arm of the main trial, reporting an increase in non-calcified plaque volume in T-treated men, with larger and longer duration studies recommended to clarify this issue [180, 181]. The Testosterone For Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus trial randomised 1,007 men aged 50–74 years, with waist circumference 95 cm or greater and either impaired glucose tolerance or newly diagnosed diabetes, to intramuscular T decanoate versus placebo for 2 years, on a background of lifestyle intervention [182]. In T4DM, T treatment reduced the risk of type 2 diabetes at 2 years by 40%, with 17 men in the placebo arm and 12 in the T arm experiencing a MACE during the trial [183]. Therefore, while the possibility that T treatment, particularly at higher doses in older men, might be associated with cardiovascular adverse events has been raised, results from meta-analyses and from two recent large RCTs provide some reassurance. Nevertheless, none of the preceding RCTs were powered for MACE as a pre-specified outcome. The results of TRAVERSE, an FDA-mandated cardiovascular safety trial of transdermal T, are a major advance in this area [184]. TRAVERSE enrolled 5246 men aged 45–80 years with cardiovascular risk factors or disease, and low-normal T concentrations. Men were randomised to T vs placebo, remaining on treatment on average for 22 months, with follow-up for an average of 33 months. Of the T-treated men, 182/2596 (7%) experienced the primary safety endpoint (first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) vs 190/2602 (7.3%) of men in the placebo group (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78–1.17) [185]. Likewise, rates of the secondary endpoint (first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization) were similar in T and placebo groups, i.e. 269 (10.4%) vs 264 (10.1%) (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86–1.21), as was all-cause mortality risk (5.5% vs 5.7%; HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78–1.23). TRAVERSE provides reassurance as to the cardiovascular safety of T treatment in middle-aged to older men with cardiovascular risk factors or disease.
Conclusions
Older men often exhibit lower T concentrations compared with younger or middle-aged men [1, 2, 5, 9]. However, it remains unclear whether low T is an inevitable consequence of aging, or a reflection of comorbidity accumulation (e.g. obesity, chronic diseases) throughout the aging process. Healthy men aged 40–69 years can have stable T concentrations over a 4-year period of follow-up [186]. However, above the age of 70 years, longitudinal declines in T levels are accompanied by increases in luteinising hormone, suggesting impairment of testicular hormone production [10]. Furthermore, the majority of people aged ≥ 65 years do not meet physical activity guidelines [187].
T is an effective physiological countermeasure for loss of lean body mass and strength in men with androgen deficiency due to disorders of the hypothalamus, pituitary or testes, who cannot produce sufficient endogenous T. Whether it represents a viable intervention to increase lean body mass and strength, and/or aerobic fitness in middle-aged to older men without disorders of the hypothalamus, pituitary or testes, remains to be established. Nonetheless, this review highlights that exercise should be a first line strategy to improve strength and aerobic fitness in aging men and that combined (aerobic and resistance) exercise training programs in middle and older-aged men are beneficial. A caveat is that many of the studies we reviewed addressed the impacts of exercise when it was center-based, supervised and verified, rather than community or home-based. An ongoing challenge with translating such benefits is adherence with longer-term exercise in community and home-based settings.
In the longer term, improvements in body composition and in strength and aerobic fitness are likely to have important consequences for successful aging. Our review suggests that T has impacts on strength, body composition and aerobic fitness outcomes that are dependent upon dose, route of administration, and formulation. Whilst T treatment in middle-aged and older men can improve lean body mass, exercise training enhances lean body mass, aerobic fitness and strength. Future research should address whether, for those unable to exercise, benefit accrues from T treatment to maintain muscle mass and avoid frailty-related health sequelae.
Availability of Data and Materials
Not applicable in this narrative review.
Abbreviations
- T:
-
Testosterone
- Ex:
-
Exercise
- T + Ex:
-
Testosterone plus exercise
- T + NEx:
-
Testosterone plus no exercise
- P + Ex:
-
Placebo plus exercise
- P + NEx:
-
Placebo plus no exercise
- PA:
-
Physical activity
- AAS:
-
Anabolic androgenic steroid
- TEX:
-
Testosterone and exercise study
- DXA:
-
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
- CV:
-
Cardiovascular
- CVD:
-
Cardiovascular disease
- 1RM:
-
1 Repetition maximum; a measure of maximal strength
- HRmax:
-
Maximal heart rate
- RCT:
-
Randomised controlled trial
- VO2peak:
-
Peak oxygen uptake
- MACE:
-
Major adverse cardiovascular events
- FDA:
-
Federal Drug Administration
References
Harman SM, Metter EJ, Tobin JD, Pearson J, Blackman MR. Longitudinal effects of aging on serum total and free testosterone levels in healthy men. Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(2):724–31. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.86.2.7219.
Feldman HA, Longcope C, Derby CA, Johannes CB, Araujo AB, Coviello AD, et al. Age trends in the level of serum testosterone and other hormones in middle-aged men: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(2):589–98. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.2.8201.
Fry A, Littlejohns TJ, Sudlow C, Doherty N, Adamska L, Sprosen T, et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK biobank participants with those of the general population. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(9):1026–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx246.
Lee DM, Pye SR, Tajar A, O’Neill TW, Finn JD, Boonen S, et al. Cohort profile: the European male ageing study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(2):391–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr234.
Yeap BB, Alfonso H, Chubb SA, Handelsman DJ, Hankey GJ, Norman PE, et al. Reference ranges and determinants of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and estradiol levels measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in a population-based cohort of older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(11):4030–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-2265.
Hsu B, Cumming RG, Hirani V, Blyth FM, Naganathan V, Le Couteur DG, et al. Temporal trend in androgen status and androgen-sensitive outcomes in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(4):1836–46. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-3810.
Sikaris K, McLachlan RI, Kazlauskas R, de Kretser D, Holden CA, Handelsman DJ. Reproductive hormone reference intervals for healthy fertile young men: evaluation of automated platform assays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(11):5928–36. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-0962.
Travison TG, Vesper HW, Orwoll E, Wu F, Kaufman JM, Wang Y, et al. Harmonized reference ranges for circulating testosterone levels in men of four cohort studies in the United States and Europe. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(4):1161–73. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2935.
Handelsman DJ, Yeap B, Flicker L, Martin S, Wittert GA, Ly LP. Age-specific population centiles for androgen status in men. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(6):809–17. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-15-0380.
Yeap BB, Manning L, Chubb SAP, Handelsman DJ, Almeida OP, Hankey GJ, et al. Progressive impairment of testicular endocrine function in ageing men: testosterone and dihydrotestosterone decrease, and luteinizing hormone increases, in men transitioning from the 8th to 9th decades of life. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2018;88(1):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13484.
Marriott RJ, Murray K, Adams RJ, Antonio L, Ballantyne CM, Bauer DC, et al. Factors associated with circulating sex hormones in men : individual participant data meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176(9):1221–34. https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-0342.
Camacho EM, Huhtaniemi IT, O’Neill TW, Finn JD, Pye SR, Lee DM, et al. Age-associated changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular function in middle-aged and older men are modified by weight change and lifestyle factors: longitudinal results from the European Male Ageing Study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;168(3):445–55. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-12-0890.
Shi Z, Araujo AB, Martin S, O’Loughlin P, Wittert GA. Longitudinal changes in testosterone over five years in community-dwelling men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(8):3289–97. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3842.
Metter EJ, Conwit R, Tobin J, Fozard JL. Age-associated loss of power and strength in the upper extremities in women and men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1997;52(5):B267–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/52a.5.b267.
Fleg JL, Morrell CH, Bos AG, Brant LJ, Talbot LA, Wright JG, et al. Accelerated longitudinal decline of aerobic capacity in healthy older adults. Circulation. 2005;112(5):674–82. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.545459.
Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Spiegelhalter DJ, Georgakopoulos D, Robinson J, Deanfield JE. Aging is associated with endothelial dysfunction in healthy men years before the age-related decline in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24(2):471–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)90305-0.
Yeap BB, Almeida OP, Hyde Z, Norman PE, Chubb SA, Jamrozik K, et al. Healthier lifestyle predicts higher circulating testosterone in older men: the Health In Men Study. Clin Endocrinol. 2009;70(3):455–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03372.x.
Yeap BB, Grossmann M, McLachlan RI, Handelsman DJ, Wittert GA, Conway AJ, et al. Endocrine Society of Australia position statement on male hypogonadism (part 1): assessment and indications for testosterone therapy. Med J Aust. 2016;205(4):173–8. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00393.
Handelsman DJ. Global trends in testosterone prescribing, 2000–2011: expanding the spectrum of prescription drug misuse. Med J Aust. 2013;199(8):548–51. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja13.10111.
Baillargeon J, Kuo Y-F, Westra JR, Urban RJ, Goodwin JS. Testosterone prescribing in the United States, 2002–2016. JAMA. 2018;320(2):200–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.7999.
Everhart A, Harper K, Jeffery MM, Levin Z, Morden NE, Sankar A, et al. Trends in testosterone prescriptions for older men enrolled in commercial insurance and medicare advantage. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(9):2127349. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27349.
Morden NE, Woloshin S, Brooks CG, Schwartz LM. Trends in testosterone prescribing for age-related hypogonadism in men with and without heart disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(3):446–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6505.
Handelsman DJ. Testosterone and male aging: faltering hope for rejuvenation. JAMA. 2017;317(7):699–701. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.0129.
Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Rodarte RQ, et al. Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5):19657. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019657.
Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr Physiol. 2012;2(2):1143–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c110025.
Hawley JA, Joyner MJ, Green DJ. Mimicking exercise: what matters most and where to next? J Physiol. 2021;599(3):791–802. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP278761.
Chasland LC, Green DJ, Schlaich MP, Maiorana AJ, Cooke BR, Cox KL, et al. Effects of testosterone treatment, with and without exercise training, on ambulatory blood pressure in middle-aged and older men. Clin Endocrinol. 2021;95(1):176–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14442.
Chasland LC, Yeap BB, Maiorana AJ, Chan YX, Maslen BA, Cooke BR, et al. Testosterone and exercise: Effects on fitness, body composition, and strength in middle-to-older aged men with low-normal serum testosterone levels. Am J Physiol Heart Circ. 2021;320(5):H1985–98. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00010.2021.
Chasland LC, Yeap BB, Maiorana AJ, Maslen BA, Naylor LH, Green DJ. Testosterone and exercise in middle-to-older aged men: combined and independent effects on vascular function. Hypertension. 2021;77:1095–105. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16411.
Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, Nevitt M, Schwartz AV, et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(10):1059–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059.
Toss F, Wiklund P, Nordstrom P, Nordstrom A. Body composition and mortality risk in later life. Age Ageing. 2012;41(5):677–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs087.
Griggs RC, Kingston W, Jozefowicz RF, Herr BE, Forbes G, Halliday D. Effect of testosterone on muscle mass and muscle protein synthesis. J Appl Physiol. 1989;66(1):498–503. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1989.66.1.498.
Brodsky IG, Balagopal P, Nair KS. Effects of testosterone replacement on muscle mass and muscle protein synthesis in hypogonadal men—a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(10):3469–75. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.81.10.8855787.
Herbst KL, Bhasin S. Testosterone action on skeletal muscle. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2004;7(3):271–7.
Ferrando AA, Sheffield-Moore M, Yeckel CW, Gilkison C, Jiang J, Achacosa A, et al. Testosterone administration to older men improves muscle function: molecular and physiological mechanisms. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002;282(3):E601–7. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00362.2001.
Kruse R, Petersson SJ, Christensen LL, Kristensen JM, Sabaratnam R, Ortenblad N, et al. Effect of long-term testosterone therapy on molecular regulators of skeletal muscle mass and fibre-type distribution in aging men with subnormal testosterone. Metabolism. 2020;112: 154347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154347.
Campbell WW, Barton ML Jr, Cyr-Campbell D, Davey SL, Beard JL, Parise G, et al. Effects of an omnivorous diet compared with a lactoovovegetarian diet on resistance-training-induced changes in body composition and skeletal muscle in older men. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70(6):1032–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/70.6.1032.
Candow DG, Chilibeck PD, Facci M, Abeysekara S, Zello GA. Protein supplementation before and after resistance training in older men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;97(5):548–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-006-0223-8.
Chrusch MJ, Chilibeck PD, Chad KE, Davison KS, Burke DG. Creatine supplementation combined with resistance training in older men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(12):2111–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200112000-00021.
Miller JP, Pratley RE, Goldberg AP, Gordon P, Rubin M, Treuth MS, et al. Strength training increases insulin action in healthy 50- to 65-yr-old men. J Appl Physiol. 1994;77(3):1122–7. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1994.77.3.1122.
Pratley R, Nicklas B, Rubin M, Miller J, Smith A, Smith M, et al. Strength training increases resting metabolic rate and norepinephrine levels in healthy 50- to 65-yr-old men. J Appl Physiol. 1994;76(1):133–7. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1994.76.1.133.
Auyeung TW, Lee JS, Kwok T, Leung J, Ohlsson C, Vandenput L, et al. Testosterone but not estradiol level is positively related to muscle strength and physical performance independent of muscle mass: a cross-sectional study in 1489 older men. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164(5):811–7. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-10-0952.
Iannuzzi-Sucich M, Prestwood KM, Kenny AM. Prevalence of sarcopenia and predictors of skeletal muscle mass in healthy, older men and women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57(12):M772–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/57.12.m772.
van den Beld AW, de Jong FH, Grobbee DE, Pols HA, Lamberts SW. Measures of bioavailable serum testosterone and estradiol and their relationships with muscle strength, bone density, and body composition in elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(9):3276–82. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.9.6825.
Szulc P, Claustrat B, Marchand F, Delmas PD. Increased risk of falls and increased bone resorption in elderly men with partial androgen deficiency: the MINOS study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(11):5240–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030200.
Roy TA, Blackman MR, Harman SM, Tobin JD, Schrager M, Metter EJ. Interrelationships of serum testosterone and free testosterone index with FFM and strength in aging men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002;283(2):E284–94. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00334.2001.
Orwoll E, Lambert LC, Marshall LM, Blank J, Barrett-Connor E, Cauley J, et al. Endogenous testosterone levels, physical performance, and fall risk in older men. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(19):2124–31. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.19.2124.
Srinivas-Shankar U, Roberts SA, Connolly MJ, O’Connell MD, Adams JE, Oldham JA, et al. Effects of testosterone on muscle strength, physical function, body composition, and quality of life in intermediate-frail and frail elderly men: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(2):639–50. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-1251.
Emmelot-Vonk MH, Verhaar HJ, Nakhai Pour HR, Aleman A, Lock TM, Bosch JL, et al. Effect of testosterone supplementation on functional mobility, cognition, and other parameters in older men: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299(1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2007.51.
Wang C, Swerdloff RS, Iranmanesh A, Dobs A, Snyder PJ, Cunningham G, et al. Transdermal testosterone gel improves sexual function, mood, muscle strength, and body composition parameters in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(8):2839–53. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.8.6747.
Snyder PJ, Peachey H, Hannoush P, Berlin JA, Loh L, Lenrow DA, et al. Effect of testosterone treatment on body composition and muscle strength in men over 65 years of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(8):2647–53. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.8.5885.
Storer TW, Woodhouse L, Magliano L, Singh AB, Dzekov C, Dzekov J, et al. Changes in muscle mass, muscle strength, and power but not physical function are related to testosterone dose in healthy older men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(11):1991–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01927.x.
Wittert GA, Chapman IM, Haren MT, Mackintosh S, Coates P, Morley JE. Oral testosterone supplementation increases muscle and decreases fat mass in healthy elderly males with low-normal gonadal status. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58(7):618–25.
Frederiksen L, Hojlund K, Hougaard DM, Brixen K, Andersen M. Testosterone therapy increased muscle mass and lipid oxidation in aging men. Age (Dordr). 2012;34(1):145–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-011-9213-9.
Sattler FR, Castaneda-Sceppa C, Binder EF, Schroeder ET, Wang Y, Bhasin S, et al. Testosterone and growth hormone improve body composition and muscle performance in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(6):1991–2001. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2338.
Bhasin S, Woodhouse L, Casaburi R, Singh AB, Mac RP, Lee M, et al. Older men are as responsive as young men to the anabolic effects of graded doses of testosterone on the skeletal muscle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(2):678–88. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-1184.
Page ST, Amory JK, Bowman FD, Anawalt BD, Matsumoto AM, Bremner WJ, et al. Exogenous testosterone (T) alone or with finasteride increases physical performance, grip strength, and lean body mass in older men with low serum T. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(3):1502–10. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-1933.
Tenover JS. Effects of testosterone supplementation in the aging male. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75(4):1092–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.75.4.1400877.
Borst SE, Yarrow JF, Conover CF, Nseyo U, Meuleman JR, Lipinska JA, et al. Musculoskeletal and prostate effects of combined testosterone and finasteride administration in older hypogonadal men: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;306(4):E433–42. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00592.2013.
Behre HM, Tammela TL, Arver S, Tolra JR, Bonifacio V, Lamche M, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of testosterone gel on body composition and health-related quality-of-life in men with hypogonadal to low-normal levels of serum testosterone and symptoms of androgen deficiency over 6 months with 12 months open-label follow-up. Aging Male. 2012;15(4):198–207. https://doi.org/10.3109/13685538.2012.699562.
De Spiegeleer A, Beckwee D, Bautmans I, Petrovic M. Pharmacological interventions to improve muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance in older people: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Drugs Aging. 2018;35(8):719–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0566-y.
Bhasin S, Brito JP, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, Hodis HN, Matsumoto AM, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(5):1715–44. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00229.
de Santana FM, Domiciano DS, Goncalves MA, Machado LG, Figueiredo CP, Lopes JB, et al. Association of appendicular lean mass, and subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue with mortality in older Brazilians: The Sao Paulo Ageing & Health Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(7):1264–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3710.
Peterson MD, Sen A, Gordon PM. Influence of resistance exercise on lean body mass in aging adults: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2):249–58. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181eb6265.
Thomas HJ, Marsh CE, Maslen BA, Scurrah KJ, Naylor LH, Green DJ. Studies of twin responses to understand exercise therapy (STRUETH): body composition. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021;53(1):58–67. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002461.
Binder EF, Yarasheski KE, Steger-May K, Sinacore DR, Brown M, Schechtman KB, et al. Effects of progressive resistance training on body composition in frail older adults: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(11):1425–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/60.11.1425.
Weeks BK, Beck BR. Twice-weekly, in-school jumping improves lean mass, particularly in adolescent boys. Pediatr Obes. 2012;7(3):196–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-6310.2011.00026.x.
Van Der Heijden GJ, Wang ZJ, Chu Z, Toffolo G, Manesso E, Sauer PJ, et al. Strength exercise improves muscle mass and hepatic insulin sensitivity in obese youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(11):1973–80. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181df16d9.
Santa-Clara H, Fernhall B, Baptista F, Mendes M, Bettencourt SL. Effect of a one-year combined exercise training program on body composition in men with coronary artery disease. Metabolism. 2003;52(11):1413–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-0495(03)00320-2.
Kelly NA, Ford MP, Standaert DG, Watts RL, Bickel CS, Moellering DR, et al. Novel, high-intensity exercise prescription improves muscle mass, mitochondrial function, and physical capacity in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. J Appl Physiol. 2014;116(5):582–92. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01277.2013.
World Health Organisation. Global recommendations on physical activity for health: 65 years and above. 2011 [cited 2021 June 16]; https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/physical-activity-recommendations-65years.pdf
Falqueto H, Junior JLR, Silverio MNO, Farias JCH, Schoenfeld BJ, Manfredi LH. Can conditions of skeletal muscle loss be improved by combining exercise with anabolic-androgenic steroids? A systematic review and meta-analysis of testosterone-based interventions. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021;22(2):161–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-021-09634-4.
Dillon EL, Sheffield-Moore M, Durham WJ, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Ryder JW, Danesi CP, et al. Efficacy of testosterone plus NASA exercise countermeasures during head-down bed rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(9):1929–39. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001616.
Stout M, Tew GA, Doll H, Zwierska I, Woodroofe N, Channer KS, et al. Testosterone therapy during exercise rehabilitation in male patients with chronic heart failure who have low testosterone status: a double-blind randomized controlled feasibility study. Am Heart J. 2012;164(6):893–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.09.016.
Dos Santos MR, Sayegh AL, Bacurau AV, Arap MA, Brum PC, Pereira RM, et al. Effect of exercise training and testosterone replacement on skeletal muscle wasting in patients with heart failure with testosterone deficiency. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(5):575–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.02.014.
Johansen KL, Painter PL, Sakkas GK, Gordon P, Doyle J, Shubert T. Effects of resistance exercise training and nandrolone decanoate on body composition and muscle function among patients who receive hemodialysis: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(8):2307–14. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006010034.
Casaburi R, Bhasin S, Cosentino L, Porszasz J, Somfay A, Lewis MI, et al. Effects of testosterone and resistance training in men with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(8):870–8. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200305-617OC.
Ferreira IM, Verreschi IT, Nery LE, Goldstein RS, Zamel N, Brooks D, et al. The influence of 6 months of oral anabolic steroids on body mass and respiratory muscles in undernourished COPD patients. Chest. 1998;114(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.114.1.19.
Gorgey AS, Khalil RE, Gill R, Gater DR, Lavis TD, Cardozo CP, et al. Low-dose testosterone and evoked resistance exercise after spinal cord injury on cardio-metabolic risk factors: an open-label randomized clinical trial. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(18):2631–45. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.6136.
Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, Callegari C, Clevenger B, Phillips J, et al. The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199607043350101.
Pasiakos SM, Berryman CE, Karl JP, Lieberman HR, Orr JS, Margolis LM, et al. Effects of testosterone supplementation on body composition and lower-body muscle function during severe exercise- and diet-induced energy deficit: a proof-of-concept, single centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. EBioMedicine. 2019;46:411–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.059.
Giorgi A, Weatherby RP, Murphy PW. Muscular strength, body composition and health responses to the use of testosterone enanthate: a double blind study. J Sci Med Sport. 1999;2(4):341–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1440-2440(99)80007-3.
Kvorning T, Christensen LL, Madsen K, Nielsen JL, Gejl KD, Brixen K, et al. Mechanical muscle function and lean body mass during supervised strength training and testosterone therapy in aging men with low-normal testosterone levels. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(6):957–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12279.
Sullivan DH, Roberson PK, Johnson LE, Bishara O, Evans WJ, Smith ES, et al. Effects of muscle strength training and testosterone in frail elderly males. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(10):1664–72. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000181840.54860.8b.
Hildreth KL, Barry DW, Moreau KL, Vande Griend J, Meacham RB, Nakamura T, et al. Effects of testosterone and progressive resistance exercise in healthy, highly functioning older men with low-normal testosterone levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(5):1891–900. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-2227.
Katznelson L, Robinson MW, Coyle CL, Lee H, Farrell CE. Effects of modest testosterone supplementation and exercise for 12 weeks on body composition and quality of life in elderly men. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;155(6):867–75. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.1.02291.
Barnouin Y, Armamento-Villareal R, Celli A, Jiang B, Paudyal A, Nambi V, et al. Testosterone replacement therapy added to intensive lifestyle intervention in older men with obesity and hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(3):e1096–110. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa917.
McCarthy JP, Agre JC, Graf BK, Pozniak MA, Vailas AC. Compatibility of adaptive responses with combining strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27(3):429–36.
Kalyani RR, Corriere M, Ferrucci L. Age-related and disease-related muscle loss: the effect of diabetes, obesity, and other diseases. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(10):819–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70034-8.
Reid KF, Naumova EN, Carabello RJ, Phillips EM, Fielding RA. Lower extremity muscle mass predicts functional performance in mobility-limited elders. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12(7):493–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982711.
Green DJ. Exercise training as vascular medicine: direct impacts on the vasculature in humans. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009;37(4):196–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e3181b7b6e3.
Green DJ, O’Driscoll G, Joyner MJ, Cable NT. Exercise and cardiovascular risk reduction: time to update the rationale for exercise? J Appl Physiol. 2008;105(2):766–8. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01028.2007.
Joyner MJ, Green DJ. Exercise protects the cardiovascular system: effects beyond traditional risk factors. J Physiol. 2009;587(Pt 23):5551–8. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.179432.
Singh AB, Hsia S, Alaupovic P, Sinha-Hikim I, Woodhouse L, Buchanan TA, et al. The effects of varying doses of T on insulin sensitivity, plasma lipids, apolipoproteins, and C-reactive protein in healthy young men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(1):136–43. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.1.8172.
Bhasin S, Woodhouse L, Casaburi R, Singh AB, Bhasin D, Berman N, et al. Testosterone dose-response relationships in healthy young men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;281(6):E1172–81. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.6.E1172.
Kallman DA, Plato CC, Tobin JD. The role of muscle loss in the age-related decline of grip strength: cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives. J Gerontol. 1990;45(3):M82–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.3.m82.
Buckner SL, Dankel SJ, Mattocks KT, Jessee MB, Mouser JG, Counts BR, et al. The problem of muscle hypertrophy: Revisited. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54(6):1012–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25420.
Sih R, Morley JE, Kaiser FE, Perry HM 3rd, Patrick P, Ross C. Testosterone replacement in older hypogonadal men: a 12-month randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(6):1661–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.82.6.3988.
Schaap LA, Koster A, Visser M. Adiposity, muscle mass, and muscle strength in relation to functional decline in older persons. Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35:51–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxs006.
Hughes VA, Frontera WR, Wood M, Evans WJ, Dallal GE, Roubenoff R, et al. Longitudinal muscle strength changes in older adults: influence of muscle mass, physical activity, and health. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(5):B209–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.5.b209.
Visser M, Goodpaster BH, Kritchevsky SB, Newman AB, Nevitt M, Rubin SM, et al. Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle fat infiltration as predictors of incident mobility limitations in well-functioning older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(3):324–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/60.3.324.
Metter EJ, Talbot LA, Schrager M, Conwit R. Skeletal muscle strength as a predictor of all-cause mortality in healthy men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57(10):B359–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/57.10.b359.
Rantanen T, Harris T, Leveille SG, Visser M, Foley D, Masaki K, et al. Muscle strength and body mass index as long-term predictors of mortality in initially healthy men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(3):M168–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/55.3.m168.
Garcia-Hermoso A, Cavero-Redondo I, Ramirez-Velez R, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Lee DC, et al. Muscular strength as a predictor of all-cause mortality in an apparently healthy population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of data from approximately 2 million men and women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(10):2100–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.008.
Ruiz JR, Sui X, Lobelo F, Morrow JR Jr, Jackson AW, Sjostrom M, et al. Association between muscular strength and mortality in men: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337: a439. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a439.
Chiu HT, Shih MT, Chen WL. Examining the association between grip strength and testosterone. Aging Male. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2019.1632282.
Chin KY, Soelaiman IN, Naina-Mohamed I, Shahar S, Teng NI, Suhana Mohd Ramli E, et al. Testosterone is associated with age-related changes in bone health status, muscle strength and body composition in men. Aging Male. 2012;15(4):240–5. https://doi.org/10.3109/13685538.2012.724740.
Kong SH, Kim JH, Lee JH, Hong AR, Shin CS, Cho NH. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and free testosterone but not estradiol are related to muscle strength and bone microarchitecture in older adults. Calcif Tissue Int. 2019;105(3):285–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-019-00566-5.
Kenny AM, Prestwood KM, Gruman CA, Marcello KM, Raisz LG. Effects of transdermal testosterone on bone and muscle in older men with low bioavailable testosterone levels. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(5):M266–72.
Clague JE, Wu FC, Horan MA. Difficulties in measuring the effect of testosterone replacement therapy on muscle function in older men. Int J Androl. 1999;22(4):261–5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2605.1999.00177.x.
Giannoulis MG, Sonksen PH, Umpleby M, Breen L, Pentecost C, Whyte M, et al. The effects of growth hormone and/or testosterone in healthy elderly men: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(2):477–84. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-0957.
Blackman MR, Sorkin JD, Munzer T, Bellantoni MF, Busby-Whitehead J, Stevens TE, et al. Growth hormone and sex steroid administration in healthy aged women and men: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(18):2282–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.18.2282.
Brill KT, Weltman AL, Gentili A, Patrie JT, Fryburg DA, Hanks JB, et al. Single and combined effects of growth hormone and testosterone administration on measures of body composition, physical performance, mood, sexual function, bone turnover, and muscle gene expression in healthy older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(12):5649–57. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-020098.
Urban RJ, Bodenburg YH, Gilkison C, Foxworth J, Coggan AR, Wolfe RR, et al. Testosterone administration to elderly men increases skeletal muscle strength and protein synthesis. Am J Physiol. 1995;269(5 Pt 1):E820–6.
Morley JE, Perry HM 3rd, Kaiser FE, Kraenzle D, Jensen J, Houston K, et al. Effects of testosterone replacement therapy in old hypogonadal males: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41(2):149–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb02049.x.
Isidori AM, Giannetta E, Greco EA, Gianfrilli D, Bonifacio V, Isidori A, et al. Effects of testosterone on body composition, bone metabolism and serum lipid profile in middle-aged men: a meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol. 2005;63(3):280–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02339.x.
Skinner JW, Otzel DM, Bowser A, Nargi D, Agarwal S, Peterson MD, et al. Muscular responses to testosterone replacement vary by administration route: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9(3):465–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12291.
O’Connell MD, Roberts SA, Srinivas-Shankar U, Tajar A, Connolly MJ, Adams JE, et al. Do the effects of testosterone on muscle strength, physical function, body composition, and quality of life persist six months after treatment in intermediate-frail and frail elderly men? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(2):454–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1167.
Li R, Xia J, Zhang XI, Gathirua-Mwangi WG, Guo J, Li Y, et al. Associations of muscle mass and strength with all-cause mortality among US older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(3):458–67. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001448.
Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Sen A, Gordon PM. Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2010;9(3):226–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004.
Liu CJ, Latham NK. Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD002759. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2.
Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Fiatarone Singh MA, Minson CT, Nigg CR, Salem GJ, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand: exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(7):1510–30. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a0c95c.
Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–59. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb.
Latham NK, Bennett DA, Stretton CM, Anderson CS. Systematic review of progressive resistance strength training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(1):48–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/59.1.m48.
Lexell J. Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50:11–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/50a.special_issue.11.
Narici MV, Bordini M, Cerretelli P. Effect of aging on human adductor pollicis muscle function. J Appl Physiol. 1991;71(4):1277–81. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1991.71.4.1277.
Hunter SK, Thompson MW, Ruell PA, Harmer AR, Thom JM, Gwinn TH, et al. Human skeletal sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ uptake and muscle function with aging and strength training. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86(6):1858–65. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.86.6.1858.
Hook P, Sriramoju V, Larsson L. Effects of aging on actin sliding speed on myosin from single skeletal muscle cells of mice, rats, and humans. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;280(4):C782–8. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.2001.280.4.C782.
Faulkner JA, Larkin LM, Claflin DR, Brooks SV. Age-related changes in the structure and function of skeletal muscles. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007;34(11):1091–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04752.x.
Klitgaard H, Mantoni M, Schiaffino S, Ausoni S, Gorza L, Laurent-Winter C, et al. Function, morphology and protein expression of ageing skeletal muscle: a cross-sectional study of elderly men with different training backgrounds. Acta Physiol Scand. 1990;140(1):41–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1990.tb08974.x.
Sipila S, Viitasalo J, Era P, Suominen H. Muscle strength in male athletes aged 70–81 years and a population sample. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;63(5):399–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364469.
Doherty TJ, Vandervoort AA, Taylor AW, Brown WF. Effects of motor unit losses on strength in older men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74(2):868–74. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.74.2.868.
Luff AR. Age-associated changes in the innervation of muscle fibers and changes in the mechanical properties of motor units. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;854:92–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09895.x.
Piasecki M, Ireland A, Coulson J, Stashuk DW, Hamilton-Wright A, Swiecicka A, et al. Motor unit number estimates and neuromuscular transmission in the tibialis anterior of master athletes: evidence that athletic older people are not spared from age-related motor unit remodeling. Physiol Rep. 2016;4(19):e12987. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12987.
Power GA, Dalton BH, Behm DG, Vandervoort AA, Doherty TJ, Rice CL. Motor unit number estimates in masters runners: use it or lose it? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(9):1644–50. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d6f9e9.
Karavirta L, Hakkinen A, Sillanpaa E, Garcia-Lopez D, Kauhanen A, Haapasaari A, et al. Effects of combined endurance and strength training on muscle strength, power and hypertrophy in 40–67-year-old men. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(3):402–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01059.x.
Mandsager K, Harb S, Cremer P, Phelan D, Nissen SE, Jaber W. Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with long-term mortality among adults undergoing exercise treadmill testing. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(6): e183605. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3605.
Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(11):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011858.
Blair SN, Kohl HW 3rd, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA. 1989;262(17):2395–401. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.262.17.2395.
Lee DC, Sui X, Artero EG, Lee IM, Church TS, McAuley PA, et al. Long-term effects of changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men: the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. Circulation. 2011;124(23):2483–90. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.038422.
Rosano GM, Leonardo F, Pagnotta P, Pelliccia F, Panina G, Cerquetani E, et al. Acute anti-ischemic effect of testosterone in men with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1999;99(13):1666–70. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.13.1666.
English KM, Steeds RP, Jones TH, Diver MJ, Channer KS. Low-dose transdermal testosterone therapy improves angina threshold in men with chronic stable angina: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Circulation. 2000;102(16):1906–11. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.16.1906.
Caminiti G, Volterrani M, Iellamo F, Marazzi G, Massaro R, Miceli M, et al. Effect of long-acting testosterone treatment on functional exercise capacity, skeletal muscle performance, insulin resistance, and baroreflex sensitivity in elderly patients with chronic heart failure a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(10):919–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.078.
Storer TW, Bhasin S, Travison TG, Pencina K, Miciek R, McKinnon J, et al. Testosterone attenuates age-related fall in aerobic function in mobility limited older men with low testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(6):2562–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-4333.
Traustadottir T, Harman SM, Tsitouras P, Pencina KM, Li Z, Travison TG, et al. Long-term testosterone supplementation in older men attenuates age-related decline in aerobic capacity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(8):2861–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-01902.
Nair KS, Rizza RA, O’Brien P, Dhatariya K, Short KR, Nehra A, et al. DHEA in elderly women and DHEA or testosterone in elderly men. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(16):1647–59. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa054629.
Kaminsky LA, Arena R, Myers J. Reference standards for cardiorespiratory fitness measured with cardiopulmonary exercise testing: data from the fitness registry and the importance of exercise national database. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(11):1515–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.07.026.
Bassett DR Jr, Howley ET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(1):70–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012.
Coviello AD, Kaplan B, Lakshman KM, Chen T, Singh AB, Bhasin S. Effects of graded doses of testosterone on erythropoiesis in healthy young and older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(3):914–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-1692.
Yu JG, Bonnerud P, Eriksson A, Stal PS, Tegner Y, Malm C. Effects of long term supplementation of anabolic androgen steroids on human skeletal muscle. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9): e105330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105330.
Sinha-Hikim I, Artaza J, Woodhouse L, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Singh AB, Lee MI, et al. Testosterone-induced increase in muscle size in healthy young men is associated with muscle fiber hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002;283(1):E154–64. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00502.2001.
Mairbaurl H. Red blood cells in sports: effects of exercise and training on oxygen supply by red blood cells. Front Physiol. 2013;4:332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00332.
Govindasamy D, Paterson DH, Poulin MJ, Cunningham DA. Cardiorespiratory adaptation with short term training in older men. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65(3):203–8.
Blumenthal JA, Emery CF, Madden DJ, Coleman RE, Riddle MW, Schniebolk S, et al. Effects of exercise training on cardiorespiratory function in men and women older than 60 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67(7):633–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90904-y.
Suominen H, Heikkinen E, Liesen H, Michel D, Hollmann W. Effects of 8 weeks endurance training on skeletal muscle metabolism in 56–70-year-old sedentary men. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1977;37(3):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00421772.
Ferrara CM, Goldberg AP, Ortmeyer HK, Ryan AS. Effects of aerobic and resistive exercise training on glucose disposal and skeletal muscle metabolism in older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(5):480–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/61.5.480.
Seals DR, Hagberg JM, Hurley BF, Ehsani AA, Holloszy JO. Endurance training in older men and women. I. Cardiovascular responses to exercise. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984;57(4):1024–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1984.57.4.1024.
Saltin B, Hartley LH, Kilbom A, Astrand I. Physical training in sedentary middle-aged and older men. II. Oxygen uptake, heart rate, and blood lactate concentration at submaximal and maximal exercise. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1969;24(4):323–34. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365516909080169.
Baggish AL, Wang F, Weiner RB, Elinoff JM, Tournoux F, Boland A, et al. Training-specific changes in cardiac structure and function: a prospective and longitudinal assessment of competitive athletes. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(4):1121–8. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01170.2007.
Seals DR, Hagberg JM, Spina RJ, Rogers MA, Schechtman KB, Ehsani AA. Enhanced left ventricular performance in endurance trained older men. Circulation. 1994;89(1):198–205. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.89.1.198.
Spence AL, Naylor LH, Carter HH, Buck CL, Dembo L, Murray CP, et al. A prospective randomised longitudinal MRI study of left ventricular adaptation to endurance and resistance exercise training in humans. J Physiol. 2011;589(Pt 22):5443–52. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.217125.
Murias JM, Kowalchuk JM, Ritchie D, Hepple RT, Doherty TJ, Paterson DH. Adaptations in capillarization and citrate synthase activity in response to endurance training in older and young men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66(9):957–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glr096.
Grimby G, Saltin B. The ageing muscle. Clin Physiol. 1983;3(3):209–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097x.1983.tb00704.x.
Hoppeler H, Howald H, Conley K, Lindstedt SL, Claassen H, Vock P, et al. Endurance training in humans: aerobic capacity and structure of skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1985;59(2):320–7. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1985.59.2.320.
Jacobs RA, Lundby C. Mitochondria express enhanced quality as well as quantity in association with aerobic fitness across recreationally active individuals up to elite athletes. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114(3):344–50. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01081.2012.
Maiorana A, O’Driscoll G, Dembo L, Cheetham C, Goodman C, Taylor R, et al. Effect of aerobic and resistance exercise training on vascular function in heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;279(4):H1999-2005. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.4.H1999.
Maiorana A, O’Driscoll G, Cheetham C, Dembo L, Stanton K, Goodman C, et al. The effect of combined aerobic and resistance exercise training on vascular function in type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(3):860–6.
Walsh JH, Bilsborough W, Maiorana A, Best M, O’Driscoll GJ, Taylor RR, et al. Exercise training improves conduit vessel function in patients with coronary artery disease. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95(1):20–5. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00012.2003.
Walsh JH, Yong G, Cheetham C, Watts GF, O’Driscoll GJ, Taylor RR, et al. Effects of exercise training on conduit and resistance vessel function in treated and untreated hypercholesterolaemic subjects. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(18):1681–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00384-1.
Spence AL, Carter HH, Naylor LH, Green DJ. A prospective randomized longitudinal study involving 6 months of endurance or resistance exercise. Conduit artery adaptation in humans. J Physiol. 2013;591(5):1265–75. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247387.
Long TM, Rath SR, Wallman KE, Howie EK, Straker LM, Bullock A, et al. Exercise training improves vascular function and secondary health measures in survivors of pediatric oncology related cerebral insult. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8): e0201449. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201449.
Montero D, Diaz-Canestro C. Endurance training and maximal oxygen consumption with ageing: role of maximal cardiac output and oxygen extraction. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(7):733–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487315617118.
Hagberg JM, Goldberg AP, Lakatta L, O’Connor FC, Becker LC, Lakatta EG, et al. Expanded blood volumes contribute to the increased cardiovascular performance of endurance-trained older men. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85(2):484–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.484.
Green DJ, Naylor LH, George K, Dempsey JA, Stickland MK, Katayama K. Cardiovascular and pulmonary adaptations to endurance training. Physiological bases of human performance during work and exercise. Oxford: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p. 49–70.
Hickson RC. Interference of strength development by simultaneously training for strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980;45(2–3):255–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421333.
Basaria S, Coviello AD, Travison TG, Storer TW, Farwell WR, Jette AM, et al. Adverse events associated with testosterone administration. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(2):109–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1000485.
Corona G, Rastrelli G, Di Pasquale G, Sforza A, Mannucci E, Maggi M. Testosterone and cardiovascular risk: meta-analysis of interventional studies. J Sex Med. 2018;15(6):820–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.04.641.
Hudson J, Cruickshank M, Quinton R, Aucott L, Aceves-Martins M, Gillies K, et al. Adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in men during testosterone treatment: an individual patient and aggregate data meta-analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022;3(6):e381–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00096-4.
Snyder PJ, Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, Matsumoto AM, Stephens-Shields AJ, Cauley JA, et al. Effects of testosterone treatment in older men. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(7):611–24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1506119.
Budoff MJ, Ellenberg SS, Lewis CE, Mohler ER 3rd, Wenger NK, Bhasin S, et al. Testosterone treatment and coronary artery plaque volume in older men with low testosterone. JAMA. 2017;317(7):708–16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.21043.
Yeap BB, Page ST, Grossmann M. Testosterone treatment in older men: clinical implications and unresolved questions from the Testosterone Trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(8):659–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30416-3.
Wittert G, Atlantis E, Allan C, Bracken K, Conway A, Daniel M, et al. Testosterone therapy to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus in at-risk men (T4DM): design and implementation of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(4):772–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13601.
Wittert G, Bracken K, Robledo KP, Grossmann M, Yeap BB, Handelsman DJ, et al. Testosterone treatment to prevent or revert type 2 diabetes in men enrolled in a lifestyle programme (T4DM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(1):32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30367-3.
Bhasin S, Lincoff AM, Basaria S, Bauer DC, Boden WE, Cunningham GR, et al. Effects of long-term testosterone treatment on cardiovascular outcomes in men with hypogonadism: rationale and design of the TRAVERSE study. Am Heart J. 2022;245:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2021.11.016.
Lincoff AM, Bhasin S, Flevaris P, Mitchell LM, Basaria S, Boden WE, et al. Cardiovascular safety of testosterone-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(2):107–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2215025.
Marriott RJ, Murray K, Hankey GJ, Manning L, Dwivedi G, Wu FCW, et al. Longitudinal changes in serum testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin in men aged 40–69 years from the UK Biobank. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2022;96(4):589–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14648.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's health 2018: Physical inactivity. 2018 [cited 2021 March 12]; https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/australias-health-2018/contents/indicators-of-australias-health/physical-inactivity
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Several studies conducted by the authors and cited in this review were funded by Vanguard Grant 100578 from the Heart Foundation of Australia. Supplementary funding for those studies was received from Lawley Pharmaceuticals, Western Australia, who also provided testosterone medication and placebo. D.J.G. was supported by a NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship (APP1080914). L.C. was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and a REDiMED PhD Top-Up scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.M. drafted the initial manuscript and tables. D.G. revised the manuscript. B.B.Y. and L.N. edited the final drafts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
All ethics approvals for studies included in this review are described in the cited articles.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable in this narrative review.
Competing interests
B.B.Y. has received speaker honoraria and conference support from Bayer, Lilly and Besins Healthcare, research support from Bayer, Lilly and Lawley Pharmaceuticals, and participated in advisory roles for Lilly, Besins Healthcare, Ferring and Lawley Pharmaceuticals. The other authors report no conflicts.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1:
Contains detailed tables comparing the impacts of testosterone and exercise training on lean mass, strength and fitness in aging men.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Green, D.J., Chasland, L.C., Yeap, B.B. et al. Comparing the Impacts of Testosterone and Exercise on Lean Body Mass, Strength and Aerobic Fitness in Aging Men. Sports Med - Open 10, 30 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00703-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00703-x