Skip to main content
Sports Medicine - Open
Download PDF
  • Original Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Nominal Differences in Acute Symptom Presentation and Recovery Duration of Sport-Related Concussion Between Male and Female Collegiate Athletes in the PAC-12

Sports Medicine - Open volume 10, Article number: 31 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sport-related concussion (SRC) is a heterogenous injury that often presents with varied symptoms and impairment. Recently, research has focused on identifying subtypes, or clinical profiles of concussion to be used in assessing and treating athletes with SRC. The purpose of this study was to investigate sex differences in clinical profiles, recovery duration, and initial symptom severity after SRC in a cohort of collegiate athletes in the Pacific-12 Conference (Pac-12).

Methods

This prospective cohort study examined post-SRC symptoms, recovery, and return-to-play times using data from the Pac-12 CARE Affiliated Program and Pac-12 Health Analytics Program. Clinical profiles reported by student-athletes were defined by the number (> 50%) of specific symptoms frequently reported for each profile. Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine associations among sex, clinical profiles, time-to-recovery, and return-to-play times.

Results

479 concussion incidents met inclusion criteria. The probabilities of initial presentation of each clinical profile, initial injury severity scores, and recovery times within a profile did not differ between sexes (p = 0.33–0.98). However, both males and females had > 0.75 probabilities of exhibiting cognitive and ocular profiles. Initial injury severity score was a strong nonlinear predictor of initial number of clinical profiles (p < 0.0001), which did not differ between sexes. The number of clinical profiles was also a nonlinear predictor of time-to-recovery (p = 0.03) and return-to-play times (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Initial symptom severity was strongly predictive of the number of acute clinical profiles experienced post-SRC. As the number of clinical profiles increased, time-to-recovery and time to return-to-play also increased. Factors other than sex may be better associated with acute symptom presentation post-concussion as no sex differences were found in reported clinical profiles or recovery. Understanding the number and type of clinical profiles experienced post-SRC may help inform concussion diagnostics and management.

Key Points

  • The number of clinical profiles reported, and initial symptom severity were associated with prolonged SRC recovery in athletes. There was also a high probability of collegiate athletes experiencing cognitive and ocular symptoms at acute concussion.

  • No sex differences were found in reported clinical profiles or time-to-recovery and time to return-to-play.

  • This is clinically important because identifying what characteristics of concussion may be associated with diagnosis and prolonged time-to-recovery and time to return-to-play can facilitate more targeted symptom management strategies after SRC.

Background

Gaining an understanding of the heterogeneity of symptom presentation and time-to-recovery from sport-related concussion (SRC) has received increasing interest in recent years [1,2,3]. Athletes exhibit different subtypes or clinical profiles of SRC, which tend to be associated with distinct sets of symptoms and recovery trajectories [3,4,5,6,7]. Identifying post-concussion clinical profiles and matching targeted and active treatments to those profiles may improve outcomes and shorten recovery times in athletes. Previous research found dependencies in symptom presentation [1] and evidence that symptoms/clinical profiles co-occur because of strong interrelatedness [8]. However, little is understood about how symptom presentation influences symptom resolution time, because the use of clinical profiles for diagnostics is still an emerging concept [3].

Previous analyses of symptom scales in collegiate athletes identified four distinct subdomains of concussion symptoms without significant symptom overlap: physical, cognitive, emotional, and sleep/fatigue [7, 9, 10]. In contrast, other studies categorized symptoms and functional impairments of SRC among six proposed clinical profiles, including: affective (anxiety/mood), fatigue, cognitive, headache/migraine, vestibular, and ocular; however, there is significant symptom overlap among these defined clinical profiles [3, 4]. Another challenge to determining clinical profiles experienced following concussion is that many athletes may present with more than one clinical profile [4, 6]. Although it has been recommended to prioritize each clinical profile as “primary, secondary, and tertiary,” overlapping symptoms between profiles further complicates this ranking process [6]. Although the connection between reported clinical profiles and time-to-recovery in collegiate athletes has yet to be explored, a strong association between specific symptoms, such as, irritability, difficulty concentrating, noise sensitivity, and dizziness reported after concussion and time to symptom resolution has been reported [1, 2].

Evidence indicates that, on average, females report significantly more symptoms and greater total symptom severity [11] after concussion than do males [12,13,14,15,16], but some studies found that recovery patterns [17, 18] and total number of symptoms [18, 19] were similar between sexes. In contrast, other studies of high school and collegiate athletes, found that the symptoms exhibited after concussion were sex-specific [13, 14, 19, 20]. Whereas females often report greater declines in cognitive function [13] and a higher number of somatic [14] and neurobehavioral symptoms [14], males have greater odds of reporting confusion [14, 20] and amnesia [14]. To date, there has been no research conducted that investigated potential differences in clinical profile presentation and recovery patterns between male and female collegiate varsity-level athletes following SRC.

The aim of this study was to identify the frequency of each proposed clinical profile, investigate sex differences in clinical profiles, time-to-recovery, and initial symptom severity score after SRC in a large cohort of collegiate student-athletes across the Pacific-12 Conference (Pac-12).

Methods

Study Design

Data were obtained from the Pac-12 Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Affiliated Program (CAP) and the Pac-12 Health Analytics Program (HAP), which are ongoing prospective cohort studies. The structure and standard procedures of CAP and HAP have been previously described [21, 22]. De-identified data collected as part of the Pac-12 HAP were derived from clinical documentation in a HIPAA Compliant electronic medical record by sports medicine clinicians. Data were de-identified using HIPAA Safe Harbor method for de-identification (45 CFR 164.514). Resulting project data included de-identified records only from student-athletes who provided authorization for secondary research as part of the HAP. Student-athletes were enrolled in this study after providing consent during the period between July 2018 and September 2022.

Participants

Female and male varsity-level athletes who consented to participate as part of the CAP and HAP studies were included if they sustained a SRC during the study period. Participant sex was self-identified as either male or female.

Procedures

Prior to the start of each sport’s season, the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT5) symptom checklist [23] was administered and defined as “baseline.” Participants also completed a medical history questionnaire from which information on sex, concussion history prior to enrolling at university, and sport played at the time of injury were obtained.

Concussion diagnoses were made by team physicians at each institution using the standardized Concussion in Sport Group definition [24]. The SCAT5 symptom checklist was administered within 48 h of injury, then symptom scores were obtained daily until asymptomatic or return to baseline. A repeat SCAT5 was administered within 24 h of the athlete returning to their baseline and beginning their return-to-play (RTP) protocol. The SCAT5 symptom checklist contains 22 symptoms which are ranked in severity on a likert scale from 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). Injury severity was defined as the sum of these symptom scores and could range from a score of 0 to a score of 132. Return-to-play progression was dependent on subjective symptom reporting by student-athletes.

Time to RTP was defined as the number of days an athlete required to complete the entire RTP protocol and to be fully cleared for athletic participation by their team physician. Time-to-recovery was defined as time from injury required for a student-athlete to reach asymptomatic status and complete their final daily SCAT5 symptom evaluation form.

Clinical Profile Measures

Six clinical profiles were described in this study using the definitions presented by the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine [3]. Clinical profiles are an emerging concept, and although SRC may present with symptoms representing only one clinical profile, it is more likely that SRC will present with symptoms of multiple profiles [3, 6]. Clinical profiles were determined by symptoms reported on the initial and daily SCAT5 Symptom Evaluation Form. To be included, a symptom had to be endorsed with a minimum severity score of “1”, and clinical profiles were not graded by reported symptom severity. Although there are overlapping symptoms among clinical profiles, certain symptoms may be more predominant than others [6]. Therefore, a participant was determined to have a given clinical profile if they reported a predominant number of symptoms, which we defined as ≥ 50% of the symptoms associated with the profile (Fig. 1). Ultimately, profiles were not mutually exclusive and participants could be diagnosed with multiple clinical profiles [25].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Methods for defining clinical profiles. Each clinical profile is defined by a subset of symptoms as depicted in the first column “symptoms reported on initial symptom evaluation form.” If a participant reported more or equal to 50% of symptoms defining a clinical profile, that participant was determined to have said clinical profile. If a clinical profile was defined by 7 symptoms (e.g., cognitive, anxiety/mood, ocular), then reporting three or more symptoms was required to have the indicated profile

Full size image

Statistical Analyses

Data Formatting

The Pac-12 athletes in our dataset represented 27 different sports. However, many of those sports had relatively few datapoints; for example, only one athlete sustained a concussion while playing golf. Therefore, to meet the cluster size requirements of mixed effects models for maximizing statistical power [26], we collapsed those 27 sports down to 11 total sports groups based on similarity of sport and sample size (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Additionally, of the 579 athletes in our data, 100 sustained concussions either outside of their respective sport (n = 82) or it was unclear if the concussion was sport-related or not (n = 18). Due to differences in recovery times, return-to-play times, injury severity scores, and number of clinical profiles reported between athletes that sustained concussions from their sport versus in non-sport related or uncertain-origin events (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), all 100 of the non-sport and uncertain-origin concussions were excluded from analysis. This resulted in a final sample size of 479 athletes with known SRC.

Model Fitting

We fit a suite of generalized linear mixed models to address the following objectives and questions. For brevity, details of each model are not presented here but are provided in the Additional file 1. First, to determine whether the initial intake values were the best representations for answering our primary questions of interest, we investigated if athletes’ SCAT5 injury severity scores and number of clinical profiles changed over time. Second, we fit models to answer the following questions: (1) did the probability of athletes having a given clinical profile differ between sexes; (2) did initial injury severity scores within a given clinical profile differ between sexes; (3) did time-to-recovery within a given clinical profile differ between sexes; (4) could clinical profiles be predicted by the injury severity scores; and (5) could recovery or return-to-play times be predicted by the number of clinical profiles?

We conducted all statistical analyses in the R statistical computing environment [27]. We fit models using the package glmmTMB [28], and we obtained scaled quantile residuals via simulation to evaluate model fit using Q-Q plots and diagnostic tests (e.g., dispersion and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests) via the package DHARMa [29]. We produced predicted conditional effects using the package ggeffects [30]. We calculated standardized effect sizes for categorical comparisons (e.g., difference between sexes), and for continuous relationships (e.g., effect of number of clinical profiles on recovery time) we calculated effect sizes as Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) [31]. We based inferences on a combination of coefficient (β) estimates, 95% confidence intervals, p-values, and effect sizes. The statistical significance determination threshold was p < 0.05, whereas biological importance was determined based on effect size values with the following scale (Cohen, 1988; Nakagawa & Cuthill, 2007): A) nominal magnitude: d < 0.2 or r < 0.7; B) small magnitude: 0.2 ≤ d < 0.5 or 0.7 ≤ r < 0.8; C) medium magnitude: 0.5 ≤ d < 0.8 or 0.8 ≤ r < 0.9; D) large magnitude: d ≥ 0.8 or r ≥ 0.9.

Results

Sample Characteristics

A total of 479 concussion incidents met inclusion criteria. Male athletes were slightly more represented than female athletes (Table 1), but the sex ratio was not statistically different from 1:1 (χ2 = 0.08; p = 0.78). From the initial SCAT5, most participants reported symptoms associated with ocular and cognitive profiles, followed by fatigue, vestibular, headache/migraine disorders, and lastly, anxiety/moodiness (Table 1).

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of Pac-12 athletes’ sex and reported clinical profiles during the initial intake evaluations
Full size table

Temporal Trends in Injury Severity Scores and Number of Clinical Profiles

Among all considered models, those with zero-inflated negative-binomial error distributions and nonlinear effects of time (days post-injury) best fit the repeated measures SCAT5 injury severity scores and number of clinical profiles. A very strong nonlinear effect of time on both injury severity scores and number of clinical profiles existed (βDays = − 9.95–4.41; p = 0.0001–0.03). The most rapid decline in injury severity scores and number of clinical profiles occurred within the first 14 days post-injury (Severity0–14 Days: 92% decline; Profiles0–14 Days: 69% decline), and the initial intake values for both injury severity scores and number of clinical profiles were the highest (Additional file 1: Fig. S2A–B). Therefore, we used the initial intake values of both responses in all subsequent analyses, unless specified otherwise below. Notably, the models’ random intercepts specification of athletes nested within their sports groupings accounted for ~ 52% of the variance explained by each model, and the overall variance explained by the injury severity scores model and number of clinical profiles model was 85% and 77%, respectively, based on coefficient of determination values [33]. For comparison, similar models that instead modeled time as linear rather than nonlinear explained 61% and 72% of the variance in injury severity scores and number of clinical profiles, respectively, demonstrating superior fit of models with a nonlinear time effect.

Sex Differences in Clinical Profiles, Injury Severity Scores, and Time-to-Recovery

Males and females did not have different probabilities of initially presenting a given clinical profile, different initial injury severity scores within a profile, or different recovery times within a profile. However, both sexes had 0.50–0.75 probability of having the vestibular, fatigue, and headache/migraine profiles, and > 0.75 probability of having the cognitive and ocular profiles (Fig. 2A–F). Mean initial injury severity scores within each profile ranged from 30 to 50, indicating that, on average, most athletes reported similar injury severity, regardless of which clinical profiles they presented with (Fig. 3A–F). Mean recovery times based on clinical profile presentation ranged from 13 to 18 days for both sexes (Fig. 4A–F).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Predicted probability point estimates (solid dots) and 95% confidence intervals (error bars) of male and female student-athletes reporting A vestibular, B cognitive, C fatigue, D anxiety/moodiness, E headache/migraine, and F ocular clinical profiles during acute concussion (based on symptom scores from initial Scat5 form)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Model-predicted mean conditional effects point estimates (solid dots) and their 95% confidence intervals (error bars) of sex-specific initial severity scores for student-athletes who sustained a concussion and had the A vestibular, B cognitive, C fatigue, D anxiety/moodiness, E headache/migraine, and F ocular clinical profiles at acute concussion (based on symptom scores from initial Scat5 form). Background violin plots depict the distributions of the raw data

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Model-predicted mean conditional effects point estimates (solid dots) and their 95% confidence intervals (error bars) of sex-specific recovery times (days) for student-athletes who sustained a concussion and had the A vestibular, B cognitive, C fatigue, D anxiety/moodiness, E headache/migraine, and F ocular clinical profiles at acute concussion (based on symptom scores from initial Scat5 form). Background violin plots depict the distributions of the raw data

Full size image

Predicting the Number of Clinical Profiles, Recovery Times, and Return-to-Play Times

Initial injury severity scores were very strong, positive, nonlinear predictors of the initial number of clinical profiles (βScores = 6.44–7.66; p < 0.0001), which did not differ between sexes (βSex:Scores = − 0.20–0.04; p = 0.91–0.99; Fig. 5). This relationship mirrored the logistic growth function, such that, on average, initial injury severity scores < 10 were predicted to have 0–1 clinical profiles, scores ≥ 10 but ≤ 43 were predicted to have 2–5 profiles, and scores > 43 were predicted to have all 6 clinical profiles (Fig. 5A). This model explained 92% of the variance in the initial number of clinical profiles.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Model-predicted mean conditional effects point estimates (solid lines) and their 95% confidence intervals (ribbons) of the A initial number of clinical profiles predicted by initial injury severity scores, B recovery times (days) predicted by initial number of clinical profiles, and C return-to-play times (days) predicted by initial number of clinical profiles, for male and female student-athletes. Background dots denote the raw data points

Full size image

Initial number of clinical profiles was a relatively weak but positive nonlinear predictor of recovery times (βProfiles = 0.31; p = 0.03). Mean recovery times differed between sexes only when athletes presented 0 clinical profiles, such that females were predicted to have recovery times that were 4 days longer than males; although, the effect size was small (p = 0.04, d = 0.16; Fig. 5B). Across all numbers of clinical profiles, the estimated mean recovery times were 13 (95% CI 10–16) and 14 (95% CI 11–17) days post-injury for females and males, respectively. This model explained 11% of the variance in recovery times.

Relative to the recovery times model, the initial number of clinical profiles was a positive nonlinear predictor of return-to-play times (βProfiles = 0.75; p < 0.0001). Mean return-to-play times significantly differed between sexes only when athletes presented 3 and 6 clinical profiles, but the effects differed for each of those profile numbers. With 3 clinical profiles, males were predicted to have return-to-play times that were 6 days longer than females (p = 0.01, d = 0.15), whereas with 6 clinical profiles, females were predicted to have return-to-play times that were 9 days longer than males (p = 0.002, d = 0.16; Fig. 5C). Across all numbers of clinical profiles, the estimated mean return-to-play times were 17 (95% CI: 14–20) and 18 (95% CI: 14–22) days post-injury for females and males, respectively. This model explained 14% of the variance in return-to-play times.

Discussion

Our study examined clinical profile presentation, time-to-recovery, and time to return-to-play, in male and female collegiate athletes in the Pac-12 after SRC. At concussion diagnosis, males and females had the highest probabilities of reporting cognitive and ocular profiles. In a study of young-adults with similar age (19.11 years), migraine and anxiety mood disorder profiles were the most commonly reported post-concussion [6]. Participants in this study were evaluated at 15.3 days post-concussion, whereas student-athletes across the Pac-12 in our study were evaluated immediately or within 48 h of injury, possibly contributing to differences in reported profiles throughout recovery [34]. No evidence was found in support of either sex having a different probability of initial presentation of a given clinical profile, initial severity score, or difference in time-to-recovery. Similarly, research of adolescent and college-aged athletes have found no sex-based differences in neurocognitive performance or recovery patterns after concussion [17, 18]. However, we found that for both sexes, the most rapid decline in injury severity scores and number of clinical profiles reported among Pac-12 athletes occurred within the first 14 days post-injury, with recovery occurring between 14 and 18 days, on average. This mean time-to-recovery was slightly longer than the purported timeframe of 2 weeks [24], though not substantially different.

Nevertheless, we found considerable evidence that self-reported symptoms resolved, and therefore recovery occurred, in a nonlinear pattern across time. Although both males and females exhibited a sharp decline in symptom severity within 3 weeks post-injury, some athletes remained symptomatic even 2 months post-injury. These findings are similar to that of the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium, which found that both males and females showed steady symptom reduction during the first 3 weeks after injury, with males being more likely than females to be asymptomatic by the fourth week [35]. The number of clinical profiles reported per clinical visit also declined in a nonlinear pattern over time; however, as supported by previous studies of collegiate varsity and non-varsity athletes, females were more likely than males to report persistent symptoms after concussion [11, 36].

Recovery times for both sexes within each clinical profile were severely right skewed with long tails, which was most likely caused by some athletes who exhibited multiple clinical profiles and required much longer than average times to reach asymptomatic status. Research in adolescent and college varsity-level athletes directly addressing differences in post-concussion time-to-recovery between sexes is limited and has produced conflicting results [5, 17]. Some Pac-12 athletes reported having 0 clinical profiles, meaning that, although symptomatic, the individual did not report a large enough number of certain symptoms to fall under a specific symptom profile. Notably, females required longer time-to-recovery than males only when zero clinical profiles were reported, otherwise no significant sex differences in time-to-recovery were found. This suggests that females may experience a broader range of symptoms but a fewer number of symptoms within a given profile than males, but as the number of symptoms increases, males and females exhibit similar recovery patterns. However, at 60–80 days after injury, some females and males did report an increase in symptom severity. It has been postulated that, compared to males, females may report persistent symptoms [11, 12, 37] after concussion due to biological differences [38] or a greater willingness to report symptoms associated with concussion [39].

Although the number of initial profiles was weakly associated with time-to-recovery and was a slightly stronger predictor of return-to-play time, neither model explained much variance in recovery or in return-to-play times (< 15%). In contrast, initial severity score was a strong positive predictor of the initial number of clinical profiles reported following concussion, and this hierarchical nonlinear model explained most of the variance in number of clinical profiles (92%). Therefore, although the number of initial profiles was not strongly associated with differences in time-to-recovery or time to return-to-play, initial severity score did explain differences in number of clinical profiles reported at acute injury.

Previous research in collegiate athletes has found that greater total symptom severity in the acute post-injury period is associated with increased white-matter abnormalities [40]. Those findings combined with our results might suggest that, as concussion symptom severity increases, there is a greater likelihood of widespread neurocognitive dysfunction, which could cause an athlete to experience a variety of symptoms associated with concussion. The number of initial clinical profiles reported was a very weak predictor of time to asymptomatic but was a slightly stronger predictor of return-to-play times. We found that at 3 clinical profiles, males required 6 more days to RTP than females, which conflicts with an NCAA study that found male athletes reported RTP duration that was abbreviated by 1 day compared to female athletes [35]. However, among athletes who reported 6 clinical profiles, we found that females required 9 more days to RTP than males. This difference in time to return-to-play at varying concussion severity may suggest that females may maintain better self-reporting behaviors throughout return-to-play progression than males [41].

Limitations

Concussion is a clinical diagnosis without an objective gold standard, which may have caused variation in how concussion was diagnosed and managed at the 12 participating institutes. However, a Pac-12 Conference-wide standard protocol [21] was enforced at all institutions, with oversight from research personnel, to manage and minimize variation in concussion reporting and data collection. Time-to-recovery was defined by the final SCAT5 exam date; therefore, recovery may have been impacted by diligence of clinical care. While possible, concussion recovery reported in this study is similar to findings from other studies conducted in collegiate athletes, in which time to asymptomatic [35] and completion of RTP protocol [35, 42] sometimes required ≥ 4 weeks. Therefore, our investigation most likely shows an accurate representation of time-to-recovery and time to return-to-play among collegiate athletes. Lastly, we failed to control for previous neurological or psychiatric problems, which have been associated with prolonged recoveries [43].

Conclusions

This study increases understanding of the variability in acute and long-term concussion symptom presentation using defined clinical profiles. We found that both males and females reported a higher probability of developing cognitive and ocular symptoms following an SRC as compared to all other clinical profiles. Diagnosis of concussion has been historically difficult because of the heterogenous nature of the injury and its sequelae; thus, these findings may aid in the development of cognitive and ocular symptom assessments for concussion diagnosis. Time-to-recovery and time to return-to-play were consistent with existing literature on collegiate athletes. However, the number of clinical profiles reported, and initial symptom severity were associated with prolonged SRC recovery in athletes, whereas clinical profile type was not. Sex was also not a strong predictor for time-to-recovery or time to return-to-play. Ultimately, although athletes may experience clusters of symptoms associated with proposed clinical profiles, the immense overlap between symptoms associated with each profile may impede the use of these profiles for diagnostics and treatment. Our results may be used to add to the understanding of conceptualized clinical profiles, and further inform targeted symptom assessments and recovery strategies.

Availability of Data and Materials

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SRC:

Sport-related concussion

Pac-12:

Pacific-12 Conference

CARE:

Pac-12 Concussion Assessment, Research and Education

CAP:

Pac-12 CARE-Affiliated Program

HAP:

Pac-12 Health Analytics Program

SCAT5:

Sport Concussion Assessment Tool

RTP:

Return-to-play

References

  1. Chandran A, Boltz AJ, Brett BL, Walton SR, Robison HJ, Collins CL, Register-Mihalik JK, Mihalik JP. Patterns and predictors of concussion symptom presentations in NCAA athletes. Res Sports Med. 2024;32(2):316–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chorney SR, Suryadevara AC, Nicholas BD. Audiovestibular symptoms as predictors of prolonged sports-related concussion among NCAA athletes. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:2850–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harmon KG, Clugston JR, Dec K, Hainline B, Herring S, Kane SF, et al. American medical society for sports medicine position statement on concussion in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53:213–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins MW, Kontos AP, Reynolds E, Murawski CD, Fu FH. A comprehensive, targeted approach to the clinical care of athletes following sport-related concussion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2014;22:235–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Henry LC, Elbin R, Collins MW, Marchetti G, Kontos AP. Examining recovery trajectories following sport-related concussion using a multi-modal clinical assessment approach. Neurosurgery. 2016;78:232–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kontos AP, Sufrinko A, Sandel N, Emami K, Collins MW. Sport-related concussion clinical profiles: clinical characteristics, targeted treatments, and preliminary evidence. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2019;18:82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lumba-Brown A, Ghajar J, Cornwell J, Bloom OJ, Chesnutt J, Clugston JR, et al. Representation of concussion subtypes in common postconcussion symptom-rating scales. Concussion. 2019;4:CNC65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Iverson GL. Network analysis and precision rehabilitation for the post-concussion syndrome. Front Neurol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00489.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Piland SG, Motl RW, Ferrara MS, Peterson CL. Evidence for the factorial and construct validity of a self-report concussion symptoms scale. J Athl Train. 2003;38:104–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sady MD, Vaughan CG, Gioia GA. Psychometric characteristics of the postconcussion symptom inventory in children and adolescents. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;29:348–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Villegas E, Hartsock MJ, Aben BLLG, Lenahan KN, Hernández TD, Spencer RL. Association between altered cortisol profiles and neurobehavioral impairment after mild traumatic brain injury in college students. J Neurotrauma. 2022;39:809–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baker JG, Leddy JJ, Darling SR, Shucard J, Makdissi M, Willer BS. Gender differences in recovery from sports-related concussion in adolescents. Clin Pediatr. 2016;55:771–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Broshek DK, Kaushik T, Freeman JR, Erlanger D, Webbe F, Barth JT. Sex differences in outcome following sports-related concussion. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:856–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frommer LJ, Gurka KK, Cross KM, Ingersoll CD, Comstock RD, Saliba SA. Sex differences in concussion symptoms of high school athletes. J Athl Train. 2011;46:76–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Merritt VC, Arnett PA. Premorbid predictors of postconcussion symptoms in collegiate athletes. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36:1098–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ono KE, Burns TG, Bearden DJ, McManus SM, King H, Reisner A. Sex-based differences as a predictor of recovery trajectories in young athletes after a sports-related concussion. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:748–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Black AM, Sergio LE, Macpherson AK. The epidemiology of concussions: number and nature of concussions and time to recovery among female and male Canadian varsity athletes 2008 to 2011. Clin J Sport Med. 2017;27:52–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kontos AP, Covassin T, Elbin RJ, Parker T. Depression and neurocognitive performance after concussion among male and female high school and collegiate athletes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1751–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Covassin T, Schatz P, Swanik CB. Sex differences in neuropsychological function and post-concussion symptoms of concussed collegiate athletes. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:345–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown DA, Elsass JA, Miller AJ, Reed LE, Reneker JC. Differences in symptom reporting between males and females at baseline and after a sports-related concussion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Auckl NZ. 2015;45:1027–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bohr AD, Aukerman DF, Harmon KG, Romano R, Hernández TD, Konstantinides N, et al. Pac-12 CARE-affiliated program: structure, methods and initial results. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021;7:e001055.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Robell KC, Norcross MF, Bohr AD, Harmon KG. Pac-12 health analytics program: an innovative approach to health care operations, data analytics, and clinical research in intercollegiate athletics. J Athl Train. 2023;58(7–8):655–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Echemendia RJ, Meeuwisse W, Mccrory P, Davis GA, Putukian M, Leddy J, Makdissi M, Sullivan SJ, Broglio SP, Raftery M, Schneider K. The sport concussion assessment tool 5th edition (SCAT5). Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(11):848–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Dvorak J, Aubry M, Bailes J, Broglio S, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, Oct 2016. Br J Sports Med. 2017; bjsports-2017–097699.

  25. Collins MW, Kontos AP, Okonkwo DO, Almquist J, Bailes J, Barisa M, et al. Concussion is treatable: statements of agreement from the targeted evaluation and active management (TEAM) approaches to treating concussion meeting held in Pittsburgh, October 15–16, 2015. Neurosurgery. 2016;79:912–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Austin PC, Leckie G. The effect of number of clusters and cluster size on statistical power and Type I error rates when testing random effects variance components in multilevel linear and logisitic regression models. J Stat Comput Simul. 2018;88:3151–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R Core Team. R A Language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing; 2022. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.

  28. Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 2017;9:378–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hartig F. DHARMa [Internet]. R package; 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 7]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=DHARMa.

  30. Lüdecke D. ggeffects: tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. J Open Sour Softw. 2018;3:772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007;82:591–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nakagawa S, Johnson PCD, Schielzeth H. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J R Soc Interface. 2017;14:20170213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Marshall SW, Guskiewicz KM, Shankar V, McCrea M, Cantu RC. Epidemiology of sports-related concussion in seven US high school and collegiate sports. Inj Epidemiol. 2015;2:13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Broglio SP, McAllister T, Katz BP, LaPradd M, Zhou W, McCrea MA, et al. The natural history of sport-related concussion in collegiate athletes: findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE consortium. Sports Med. 2022;52:403–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Covassin T, Moran R, Elbin RJ. Sex differences in reported concussion injury rates and time loss from participation: an update of the national collegiate athletic association injury surveillance program from 2004–2005 through 2008–2009. J Athl Train. 2016;51:189–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zuckerman SL, Apple RP, Odom MJ, Lee YM, Solomon GS, Sills AK. Effect of sex on symptoms and return to baseline in sport-related concussion. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;13:72–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bazarian JJ, Blyth B, Mookerjee S, He H, McDermott MP. Sex differences in outcome after mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:527–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kerr ZY, Register-Mihalik JK, Kroshus E, Baugh CM, Marshall SW. Motivations associated with nondisclosure of self-reported concussions in former collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:220–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu Y-C, Harezlak J, Elsaid NMH, Lin Z, Wen Q, Mustafi SM, et al. Longitudinal white-matter abnormalities in sports-related concussion: a diffusion MRI study. Neurology. 2020;95:e781–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kurowski B, Pomerantz WJ, Schaiper C, Gittelman MA. Factors that influence concussion knowledge and self-reported attitudes in high school athletes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77:S12–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. McCrea M, Broglio S, McAllister T, Zhou W, Zhao S, Katz B, et al. Return to play and risk of repeat concussion in collegiate football players: comparative analysis from the NCAA concussion study (1999–2001) and CARE consortium (2014–2017). Br J Sports Med. 2020;54:102–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Iverson GL, Gardner AJ, Terry DP, Ponsford JL, Sills AK, Broshek DK, et al. Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:941–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This project was supported, in part, with support from the Pac-12 Conference’s Student-Athlete Health and Well-Being Initiative and the Grand Alliance Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium, funded, in part by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the Department of Defense (DOD). The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Pac-12 Conference, or its members, or the NCAA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, UCB 354, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA

    Niki A. Konstantinides & Rachel K. Rowe

  2. Cumberland Biological and Ecological Researchers, Longmont, CO, USA

    Sean M. Murphy

  3. Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Bridget M. Whelan & Kimberly G. Harmon

  4. Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA

    Sourav K. Poddar

  5. Psychology and Neuroscience (CU Boulder), Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (CU Anschutz School of Medicine), Aurora, CO, USA

    Theresa D. Hernández

Authors
  1. Niki A. Konstantinides
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sean M. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bridget M. Whelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kimberly G. Harmon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sourav K. Poddar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Theresa D. Hernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rachel K. Rowe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NAK assisted with conceptualization, data collection, formal analysis, and led writing of the manuscript. SMM led statistical analyses and assisted with reviewing and editing the manuscript. RKR assisted with formulating the research questions, analysis, and reviewing and editing of the manuscript. BMW, KGH, SKP, and TDH assisted with reviewing and editing of the manuscript and providing final approval of the version published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niki A. Konstantinides.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. Research was conducted with the appropriate institutional review board (IRB) approval (Protocol 22–0322). Consent to participate was not applicable for this study.

Consent for Publication

Consent for publication was given by the Pac-12 Health Analytics Program (HAP).

Competing interests

The authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

provides one table describing sports groups represented in the data, and figures illustrating the differences in injury characteristics of non-sport and sport-related concussion, as well as sex differences in severity score and number of clinical profiles daily after injury. Additional details of the methods for statistical analyses is also included.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konstantinides, N.A., Murphy, S.M., Whelan, B.M. et al. Nominal Differences in Acute Symptom Presentation and Recovery Duration of Sport-Related Concussion Between Male and Female Collegiate Athletes in the PAC-12. Sports Med - Open 10, 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00699-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00699-4

Keywords