Skip to main content

Table 1 Selection criteria used in the meta-analysis

From: Effects of Plyometric Jump Training on Measures of Physical Fitness and Sport-Specific Performance of Water Sports Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Category

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Population

Healthy water sport athletes, with no restrictions on their fitness or competitive level, sex, or age

Participants with health problems (e.g. injuries, recent surgery), precluding participation in a plyometric jump training programme

Intervention

A plyometric jump training programme, with a minimal duration of ≥ 3 weeks, which included unilateral and/or bilateral jumps, which commonly utilize a pre-stretch or countermovement stressing the stretch–shortening cycle

Exercise interventions not involving plyometric jump training (e.g. upper-body plyometrics only training interventions) or exercise interventions involving plyometric jump training programmes representing less than 50% of the total training load (i.e. volume, e.g. number of exercises) when delivered in conjunction with other training interventions (e.g. high-load resistance training)

Comparator

Active control group (i.e. athletes participating in regular training schedules)

Studies comparing different plyometric jump training approaches (e.g. different intensity) without active control group, or traditional control group (i.e. non-active participants) will also be considered, as well as specific-active control groups (e.g. involving alternative training methods such as high-load resistance training)

Absence of control group

Outcome

At least one measure related to physical fitness (e.g. countermovement jump height; body fat) and/or sport-specific performance (e.g. 50-m swimming speed) before and after the training intervention

Lack of baseline and/or follow-up data

Study design

Multi-arm trials

Single-arm trials/observational studies