Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant characteristics of included studies on load autoregulation

From: The Effect of Load and Volume Autoregulation on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Study

Group

Number of participants

Sex distribution

Age (years)a

Height (cm)a

Weight (kg)a

Training status (subjective description; years of resistance-training experience)

Arede et al. [23]

PBT

7

F

15.8 ± 1.3

168.4 ± 4.5

60.2 ± 6.0

Resistance-trained female basketball players; ≥ 1 year

RPE

7

F

Banyard et al. [22]

PBT

12

M

26.2 ± 5.1

181.4 ± 7.4

84.2 ± 7.7

Resistance-trained males; ≥ 2 years

VBT

12

M

25.5 ± 5.0

180.7 ± 8.5

84.7 ± 6.8

Dorrell et al. [15]

PBT

8

M

22.8 ± 4.5

180.2 ± 6.4

89.3 ± 13.3

Resistance-trained males; ≥ 2 years

VBT

8

M

Dorrell et al. [18]

Group VBT

19

M

23.6 ± 3.7

182.7 ± 5.1

92.2 ± 8.7

Resistance-trained males; ≥ 2 years

Individualized VBT

M

Graham and Cleather [20]

PBT

16

M

28.3 ± 5.6

177.8 ± 6.5

82.5 ± 8.9

Resistance-trained males; ≥ 2 years

RPE

15

M

27.9 ± 5.3

179.6 ± 6.5

83.2 ± 9.7

Helms et al. [21]

PBT

11

M

23.8 ± 4.2

175 ± 8

80.2 ± 12.2

Resistance-trained males; ≥ 2 years

RPE

10

M

20.9 ± 1.4

172 ± 6

78.8 ± 9.7

Orange et al. [19]

PBT

15

M

17 ± 1

181 ± 6.3

84.9 ± 11.9

Resistance-trained male rugby players; ≥ 2 years

VBT

12

M

17 ± 1

178 ± 5.3

81.8 ± 11.9

Shattock and Tee [16]

Group 1

10

M

22 ± 3

NR

93.1 ± 14.5

Resistance-trained male rugby players; ≥ 2 years

Group 2

10

M

23 ± 3

NR

95.6 ± 16.8

  1. cm centimetres, F female, kg kilograms, M male, NR not reported, PBT percentage-based training, RPE repetitions in reserve-based rating of perceived exertion training, VBT velocity-based training
  2. aData are presented as mean ± standard deviation