Skip to main content

Video Analysis and Verification of Direct Head Impacts Recorded by Wearable Sensors in Junior Rugby League Players



Rugby league is a high-intensity collision sport that carries a risk of concussion. Youth athletes are considered to be more vulnerable and take longer to recover from concussion than adult athletes.


To review head impact events in elite-level junior representative rugby league and to verify and describe characteristics of X-patchTM-recorded impacts via video analysis.

Study Design

Observational case series.


The X-patchTM was used on twenty-one adolescent players (thirteen forwards and eight backs) during a 2017 junior representative rugby league competition. Game-day footage, recorded by a trained videographer from a single camera, was synchronised with X-patchTM-recorded timestamped events. Impacts were double verified by video review. Impact rates, playing characteristics, and gameplay situations were described.


The X-patchTM-recorded 624 impacts ≥ 20g between game start and finish, of which 564 (90.4%) were verified on video. Upon video review, 413 (73.2%) of all verified impacts ≥ 20g where determined to be direct head impacts. Direct head impacts ≥ 20g occurred at a rate of 5.2 impacts per game hour; 7.6 for forwards and 3.0 for backs (range = 0–18.2). A defender’s arm directly impacting the head of the ball carrier was the most common event, accounting for 21.3% (n = 120) of all impacts, and 46.7% of all “hit-up” impacts. There were no medically diagnosed concussions during the competition.


The majority (90.4%) of head impacts ≥ 20g recorded by the X-patchTM sensor were verified by video. Double verification of direct head impacts in addition to cross-verification of sensor-recorded impacts using a secondary source such as synchronised video review can be used to ensure accuracy and validation of data.

Key Points

  • There was a substantial number of false-positive high acceleration impacts recorded that occurred before, during, or after the games. Wearable instrumented technology has limitations as a primary data source and should be used in conjunction with video review.

  • The vast majority of high acceleration impacts (≥ 20g) that occurred during game time were verified on video review.

  • Careful time synchronisation of impact sensor-recorded events and match video is vital to help cross-validation and to reduce over-estimation of an athlete’s direct head impact exposure.


Rugby league carries a risk of concussion due to its high intensity and frequency of collisions [1]. Youth athletes may be more vulnerable to sustaining a concussion [2,3,4] and may also take longer to recover from a concussion than adult athletes [5,6,7,8]. Recently, various technology has been introduced to assist in the identification of head impacts and suspected concussions during athlete competitions. For instance, sideline video review [9, 10], and to a lesser extent, impact sensors in helmeted and non-helmeted sports have been introduced to measure kinematic forces to the head [11, 12].

Sideline video review has become increasingly common in professional sports for identifying head impact events and potential concussions. Recently, multiple experts from seven national and international professional sporting codes developed international consensus definitions of video signs of possible concussion, agreeing on six video signs: (i) lying motionless (for > 2 s); (ii) motor incoordination (e.g. losing balance); (iii) impact seizure; (iv) tonic posturing (involuntary sustained contraction of one or more limbs); (v) no protective action/floppy; and (vi) blank/vacant look [9]. The National Rugby League (NRL) has incorporated a Head Injury Assessment (HIA) process that uses sideline video review as a method to identify direct head impacts and potential signs of concussion in players. The identification of a player displaying potential signs of concussion evokes the HIA process, which includes mandatory immediate removal from play and subsequent assessment [13]. During the 2014 season, the incidence of suspected concussions based on the use of this process was 24.0 per 1000 NRL player game hours [13]. In the same season, the incidence of medically diagnosed concussions following the use of this process was 8.9 per 1000 player game hours [14].

Another proposed method for ascertaining whether a possible concussion occurred during gameplay has been measuring the kinematic responses of a player’s head to impact forces through wearable sensor technology. The X2 X-patchTM is an impact sensor designed for non-helmeted athletes that has been used in three previous rugby league studies in junior, women’s, and semi-professional competitions [15,16,17]. Worn behind the ear, the X-patchTM uses a triaxial gyroscope and accelerometer to calculate linear and angular accelerations experienced by the head during collisions [18]. Previous X-patchTM studies in under 10-year-old rugby league [15] and under 9-year-old rugby union [19] reported on impact magnitudes comparable to studies on young adults. However, given that the X-patch-recorded impacts were not verified on video, the validity of these findings is questionable [20]. Some studies have examined helmeted impacts in 15- to 17-year-old athletes (e.g. American Football [21,22,23,24], Lacrosse [18]) using wearable sensors, but no studies have examined impacts in similarly aged rugby league players. Given that a direct head impact is more likely to result in a concussion than an indirect head impact [25], the relevance of player characteristics and gameplay situations to the relative risk of sustaining concussion may be an important consideration. The purpose of this study is to (i) determine the rate at which sensor-recorded impacts using the X-patchTM are verified on video review of game footage, (ii) document the number of video verified direct head impacts that are not recorded on the sensors, and (iii) describe and compare playing characteristics and gameplay situations of video-verified direct and indirect impacts over a season of play in a squad of elite-level youth (under 16s) rugby league players.



A prospective cohort study was performed on a junior male representative rugby league team during the 2017 New South Wales (NSW) Rugby League Harold Matthews Competition. The Harold Matthews competition is an elite-level, state-based season of games for under 16-year-old male rugby league players. It forms one of the first stages of the elite-level pathway. The competition consists of 16 clubs from the NRL and Canterbury (NSW) Cup competitions. The Harold Matthews competition is played over 9 weeks, with the top five teams qualifying for the post-season (i.e. a 3-week finals series). From a squad of 22 adolescent players, 21 (age range: 15–16 years, mean = 15.5 years, SD = 0.5 years) including 13 forwards and 8 backs from one club participated in the study, with one player declining to participate. Written consent was obtained by a legal parent or guardian for each participating player, and verbal assent was obtained by each individual player. A rugby league team consists of 13 players (6 forwards and 7 backs) on the field at any one time with 4 interchange players. On average, data were collected from 13 participants per week (range: 9–15 players per week).

The research protocol was approved by the University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee. The study was also endorsed by the participating club. The methods for data collection were identical to our previous study on a semi-professional men’s rugby league team [17].


Impact Sensors

A total of 15 X-patchTM sensors (X2 Biosystems) were available and deployed at the beginning of the season. Each sensor contains a low-power, high-g triaxial accelerometer, and gyroscope that measures linear and angular accelerations and decelerations to provide 6 degrees of freedom kinematic head impact data. All players’ sensors were attached to the skin covering the right mastoid process by an experienced member of the research team. Positioning of the sensor is crucial to ensure it is not activated by soft tissue muscles in the neck [26]. Each sensor was uniquely labelled and attached before the warm up using a double-sided adhesive patch. The X-patchTM is triggered when linear acceleration exceeds 10g and records data for 90 ms after the trigger and 10 ms before the trigger equalling one-tenth of a second of data (100 ms) to its on-board memory. Once the sensor is removed, its stored data can be downloaded and analysed using the Injury Management Software (IMS; X2 Biosystems). Each recorded event is “timestamped” and a set of impact measures are recorded, including PLA, peak rotational acceleration (PRA), peak rotational velocity (PRV), and head impact location. In our study, a Head Impact (HI ≥ 20g) was defined as an event recorded by the X-patchTM with a peak linear acceleration (PLA) ≥ 20g. Emphasis was placed on impacts ≥ 20g to avoid confusion with a large number of low-acceleration events, unlikely to result in deleterious neurophysiological change [17, 27]. Brennan et al [28] observed that the mean PLA associated with concussion was 99g. PLA was utilised in this as previous research shows it has greater reliability and less variance than rotational measurements [20, 29]. To remove low-acceleration events commonly associated with normal gameplay (e.g. sharp changing of directions, jumping, running) all video-verified impacts were filtered to only include HI ≥ 20g as suggested in previous studies [17, 27, 30].

Sensors were collected from players after the game. All recorded impacts were reviewed and extracted from IMS, displayed in the form of a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, and sorted into individual player cross-tabulations. Each sensor was then cleared of all impacts and charged in preparation for the following game.

Video Review and Synchronising with Sensors’ Time Stamp

Each game was recorded with a single high-definition camera by a trained videographer. The video closely followed the play, including both the ball carrier and engaged defenders, and therefore captured competition-related collisions. The best possible vantage point was obtained on the midline of the field with close-up shots panning left and right to follow the play. Each game was reviewed from start to finish using QuickTime X (Apple Inc.) by one reviewer (LC). Video was synchronised with the timestamps of each sensor before the verification review was conducted. The first head impact seen on video review was checked against the HI ≥ 20g after the game start time on the sensor’s timestamp, the same synchronisation method used previously on collegiate Lacrosse athletes by Kindschi and colleagues [31]. Subsequent video-recorded impacts were then checked against timestamps at corresponding intervals. To synchronise the timestamp from the X-patchTM with the video footage time, multiple impacts were reviewed on video and aligned to the sensor timestamp. Each potential video verified HI ≥ 20g (VV-HI ≥ 20g) was checked multiple times with both the timestamp and video to establish they were precisely synchronised before conducting the video verification process from start to finish of gameplay.

VV-HI ≥ 20g were also classified by the game event or situation. Each VV-HI ≥ 20g was deemed to be a “Hit-Up” (attacking player carrying the ball), “Tackle” (defending player attempting to stop the ball carrier), or “Off-The-Ball” incident (contact without the ball). Triggered events ≥ 20g that did not correlate with a collision on video review were documented. Similarly, collisions on video review that involved a player with a working sensor attached and did not correspond to a triggered event were documented. For this study a “Direct VV-HI ≥ 20 g” was defined as a clearly observed physical head contact that corresponded with a HI ≥ 20g, whereas an “Indirect VV-HI ≥ 20 g” was a clearly observed body contact, excluding the head, that corresponded with a HI ≥ 20g. VV-HI ≥ 20g were then sorted into a number of sub-categories including the following: (i) direct (impact to head) vs. non-direct, (ii) number of tacklers involved (i.e. 1–4), (iii) point of impact on player with sensor (i.e. head, shoulder, chest, arm, waist and below), (iv) side of impact (i.e. right, left, front, back, top), (v) point of contact from opposition player (i.e. head, shoulder, chest, arm, waist and below), and (vi) wrestling impacts happening after first initial contact from tackle. A second reviewer (AG) then independently reviewed HI ≥ 20g during game time that were not verified on video. The process of double verification of these “false-positive” impacts helped clarify the accuracy of each ‘impact’ included in the video verified data. Using the synchronised data set, the timestamps of non-verified HI ≥ 20g were double-checked with the corresponding video time. Video for approximately 20 s before and after the HI ≥ 20g was reviewed with a focus on the relevant player. The results of this review process were then coded into categories (e.g. “HI ≥ 20g not fully visualised in the available footage”, or “HI ≥ 20g fully visualised with no contact identified”). All HI ≥ 20g cases that were not verified as involving either a direct or indirect impact were excluded from the analyses. This double verification process was conducted independently by the two reviewers.

Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics for PLA and PRV of VV-HI ≥ 20g were calculated and included frequencies, percentages, medians, and standard deviations. VV-HI ≥ 20g per player game hours rates were calculated for all players and positions using the number of VV-HI ≥ 20g divided by the number of game hours. The formula for calculating the impact rate is provided below.

$$ \mathrm{Impact}\ \mathrm{Rate}=\sum \mathrm{VV}-\mathrm{HI}\ge 20\mathrm{g} $$
$$ \sum \mathrm{Player}\ \mathrm{Game}\ \mathrm{Hours} $$

Percentages of video verified and non-verified HI ≥ 20g were calculated to determine the validity of the X-patchTM and to remove any “false positives” from the analysed data set. This was calculated as the number of VV-HI ≥ 20g divided by the number of total recorded HI ≥ 20g during gameplay, multiplied by one hundred. The formula for calculating percentage of verified impacts is provided below.

$$ \%\mathrm{Video}\ \mathrm{Verified}\ \mathrm{Impacts}=\sum \mathrm{VV}-\mathrm{HI}\ge 20\mathrm{g}\times 100 $$
$$ \sum \mathrm{HI}\ge 20\mathrm{g} $$

Location accuracy of direct and indirect VV-HI ≥ 20g was analysed and the accuracy percentage was calculated to show the agreement between the VV-HI ≥ 20g impact location (i.e. front, back, side, top) estimated from the sensor data in the IMS and video review. Location accuracy percentages were calculated as the number of times the sensor-based and the video-based location estimates were in agreement divided by the total number of impacts per location on video review, multiplied by one hundred. The formula for location accuracy for VV-HI ≥ 20g is provided below.

$$ \mathrm{Location}\ \mathrm{Accuracy}\kern0.17em \mathrm{for}\ \mathrm{VV}-\mathrm{HI}\ge 20\mathrm{g}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \sum \mathrm{location}\ \mathrm{agreement}\kern0.5em \times 100 $$
$$ \sum \mathrm{total}\kern0.34em \mathrm{video}\kern0.34em \mathrm{locations} $$

VV-HI ≥ 20g data were reviewed for playing positions (i.e. forward versus back) and characteristics (i.e. attacking, defending, off-the-ball). An identical approach to our previous video verification study [17] for the analysis of this data was conducted. VV-HI ≥ 20g incidence rates for forwards and backs were compared using an exploratory t test. Exploratory Mann-Whitney U tests compared impact magnitude (i.e. PLA, PRV) between video-verified/non-verified HI ≥ 20g, direct/indirect VV-HI ≥ 20g, first/second half VV-HI ≥ 20g, and forward/back position VV-HI ≥ 20g because these variables were not normally distributed. All analyses were performed using SPSS 23 (IBM Corp).


Game Hours and Sensor Recording

A total of 79.4 player game hours (4762 min) was recorded, with backs accounting for 52.1% (2479 min) and forwards accounting for 47.9% (2283 min) of the hours. Throughout the season, the number of available and working sensors was reduced to eleven due to deteriorating battery life (i.e. the sensor did not recharge), or the sensor was permanently lost during a game. The X-patchTM became detached 16 times throughout the season from eight different players (2 players once, 5 players twice, and 1 player 4 times), for a total of 456 min of lost data due to detached sensors for the season (backs: n = 4, total = 148 min, mean = 37 min, median = 33 min, SD = 11.11, range = 29–53; forwards: n = 12, total = 308, mean = 25.7 min, median = 28.5 min, SD = 9.94, range = 11–45). In addition, there was 121 min of game time lost due to 3 faulty sensors (all forwards).

Sensor-Recorded Impacts

There were 3835 triggered events recorded by the X-patchTM with PLA ≥10g (see Fig. 1). Triggered events that could be interpreted as head impacts that occurred outside of game time (i.e. in warm up, cool-down, during application/removal of sensors) accounted for 1199 impacts (31.3%; 678 before game, 521 after game). On video review, 34 triggered events were removed due to occurring in the process of, or after, the sensor becoming detached in a tackle. A further 636 triggered events were removed due to two players placing the sensor in their sock after it became dislodged leaving a total of 1966 triggered events with PLA ≥ 10g during gameplay. From these triggered events, 1342 were < 20g and therefore excluded which yielded a total of 624 triggered events ≥ 20g during gameplay (HI ≥ 20g).

Fig. 1

Flow diagram of sensor recorded impacts and video verification

Video Verification of Sensor-Recorded Impacts

Of the 624 HI ≥ 20g during gameplay, 564 (90.4%) were verified on video. The distribution of all X-patchTM-triggered events and VV-HI ≥ 20g can be found in Fig. 2. From 564 VV-HI ≥ 20g, 257 were as a result of a hit-up, 278 from a tackle, and 29 off-the-ball incidents. 413 (73.2%) were identified as direct head impacts and 151 (26.9%) as non-direct impacts occurring to either the shoulder, chest, arm, or waist. Of the 413 direct VV-HI ≥ 20g, the tackler (defender) recorded 204 (49.4%), the ball carrier (attacker) recorded 186 (45.0%), while 23 were recorded during off-the-ball incidents (5.6%; incidental contact n = 4; melee/scuffle or fighting n = 1; contact celebrating tries n = 10; contact celebrating penalty n = 1; contact packing scrums n = 5; clutching at own head after tackle n = 2). Direct VV-HI ≥ 20g (as determined by video review) had a greater PLA compared to indirect VV-HI ≥ 20g [direct n = 413, mean = 37.3, median = 31.3, SD = 17.5, range 20–113.3; indirect n = 151, mean = 25.5, median = 24.0, SD = 5.4, range 20–45.7; U = 15,728.00, p < .001; Cohen’s d = 0.83] as well as greater PRV compared to indirect VV-HI ≥ 20g [direct n = 413, mean = 29.9, median = 28.5, SD = 11.3, range 6.8-56.6; indirect n = 151, mean= 24.8, median = 23.4, SD = 8.7, range 6.2–54.9; U = 23,162.00, p < .001; d = 0.48]. Figure 3 provides a comparison of the peak linear acceleration and peak rotational velocity between all direct and indirect VV-HI ≥ 20g. The individual player data by position, playing time, video-verified impacts, and VV-HI ≥ 20g per game hour are provided in Table 1.

Fig. 2

Distribution of all X-patchTM triggered events and VV-HI ≥ 20g. The black bar denotes X-patchTM triggered events. The white bar with stripes denotes VV-HI ≥ 20g

Fig. 3

Scatterplot of video verified direct and indirect impacts ≥ 20g recorded by the X-patch™. The multiplication sign denotes Direct Impact. The black circle denotes Indirect Impact

Table 1 Cross-tabulation of frequency of verified in-game impacts ≥ 20g measured by the X-patchTM

Impacts Seen on Video and Not Recorded on the Sensors

There were 858 video observed impacts, including 28 direct head impacts, that did not result in any triggered event from the X-patchTM, either because the sensors did not activate (despite other impacts being recorded on those sensors in close temporal proximity) or because the impact did not reach the 10g threshold (see Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Flow diagram showing video verified impacts

Sensor-Recorded Impacts Not Verified on Video

There were 1199 triggered events that occurred before or after the game which were removed from the analysed data (Fig. 1). There were 506 triggered events registered as ≥ 20g that were not seen on video, and of those 185 occurred before the game (36.6%, presumably during warm up), 60 occurred during the game (11.9%), and 261 occurred after the game (51.6%). Individual impacts during the game, outside game time, and while the sensor was detached are illustrated in Fig. 5.

Fig 5

Scatterplot of all impacts ≥ 20g recorded by the X-patchTM. The multiplication sign denotes During Game. The black circle denotes Outside Game. The white box denotes Sensor Detached

A total of 60 HI ≥ 20g that occurred during game time were not verified on video review. Of these, 33 HI ≥ 20g were recorded when the player was on the bench, 15 were not visualised (including 12 impacts while the player was not involved or was “behind” the play and three impacts when the game was halted after the awarding of a penalty), one was partially visualised on video but was indeterminant, and 11 recorded impacts had complete visualisation but with no identified contact (including seven during a sharp change of direction from the player, three during change of speed while running, and one with no visible correlate). In all of these instances, there was clearly no contact from another player. Each of these HI ≥ 20g was verified by two reviewers to confirm them as “false-positive” impacts. There was no significant difference in the PLA of VV-HI ≥ 20g versus false-positive HI ≥ 20g [verified n = 564, mean=34.1g, median = 28.4g, SD = 16.1, range = 20.0–113.3g; non-verified n = 60, mean = 30.9g, median = 26.1g, SD = 13.3, range = 20.0–76.6g; U = 14,706.00, p = .10; d = 0.20] but a difference in PRV [verified mean = 28.5rad/s, median = 26.9rad/s, SD = 10.9, range = 6.2–56.6rad/s; non-verified mean = 25.2rad/s, median = 22.4rad/s, SD = 13.0, range = 6.3–55.4rad/s; U = 13,727.00, p = .02, d = 0.30].

Situational Characteristics of Video-Verified and Sensor-Recorded Impacts

Of the 413 direct VV-HI ≥ 20g, players sustained an average of 5.2 direct VV-HI ≥ 20g per hour of gameplay, with a slightly higher rate of direct VV-HI ≥ 20g during the second half of the game [first half 4.6 impacts/h, n = 192; second half 5.8 impacts/h, n = 221]. The magnitude of these direct VV-HI ≥ 20g did not statistically differ between the first and second half (PLA: U = 20,211.00, p = .41; PRV: U = 21,088.00, p = .92). Forwards had a higher rate of direct VV-HI ≥ 20g than backs [forwards M = 8.08 impacts/h, SD = 4.46; backs M = 2.90 impacts/h, SD = 1.60; t(22) = 7.58 p = .001, d = 1.29]. However, the intensity of direct VV-HI ≥ 20g did not statistically differ between forwards and backs (PLA: U = 17,047.00, p = .53; PRV: U = 17,656.00, p = .93).

The most common event that caused a VV-HI ≥ 20g was from a defender’s arm directly impacting the head of a ball carrier (n = 120). This type of gameplay accounted for 21.3% of all VV-HI ≥ 20g and 46.7% of all hit-up VV-HI ≥ 20g. The most common event associated with a VV-HI ≥ 20g for a tackler was an attacker’s arm (n = 60) or waist (n = 60) directly impacting the head of the tackler. Each of these accounted for 10.6% of all VV-HI ≥ 20g and 21.6% of tackler VV-HI ≥ 20g. Contact with the playing surface accounted for 44 VV-HI ≥ 20g (7.8%; hit-up n = 32, tackle n = 9, off-the-ball n = 3). Of the 151 indirect VV-HI ≥ 20g, a ball carrier’s shoulder impacting with a defender’s shoulder (11.9%, n = 18, 3.2% of all impacts) or the defender’s chest impacting a ball carrier’s shoulder (10.6%, n = 16, 2.9% of all impacts) were the most common. A detailed overview of all VV-HI ≥ 20g for a hit-up, tackle, and off-the-ball events is provided in Table 2.

Table 2 Sensor-recorded and video-verified impact locations ≥ 20 g

Direction of Sensor-Recorded and Direct VV-HI ≥ 20 g

When looking at the location of all direct VV-HI ≥ 20g (n = 413) via the IMS, most occurred to the front (n = 198; 47.9%), followed by the side (n = 111; 26.9%), back (n = 83; 20.1%), and top (n = 21; 5.1%) of the head. When examining the location via video review, we found most direct VV-HI ≥ 20g occurred to the side (n = 357, 86.4%) with fewer to the front (n = 14, 3.4%), back (n = 34, 8.2%), and top (n = 8, 1.9%) of the head. The location of direct VV-HI ≥ 20g corresponded in only 24.9% of cases with the video review [42.9% (n = 6) to the front of the head, 25.2% (n = 90) to the side, 17.6% (n = 6) to the back, and 12.5% (n = 1) to the top]. The sensor-derived impact location was poorly correlated with side-on direct head impacts visualised on video, and as such overestimated VV-HI ≥ 20g in all other directions, particularly front-on impacts. A detailed description of the location accuracy for direct and indirect VV-HI ≥ 20g is provided in Table 3.

Table 3 Video verified impacts: location accuracy of direct and indirect impacts ≥ 20g

Tackles and Secondary Impacts

Secondary impacts during a tackle (i.e. impacts after the initial contact in the same tackle event) accounted for 46.1% (n = 260) of total VV-HI ≥ 20g and 53.5% (n = 221) of all direct VV-HI ≥ 20g. For 260 secondary impacts, 16.2% (n = 42) were accompanied by a VV-HI ≥ 20g. There were 456 tackles that resulted in the 535 VV-HI ≥ 20g, excluding impacts that occurred “off the ball.” For 388 tackles there was one impact recorded, for 60 there were two impacts recorded, for 7 there were three impacts recorded, and for 1 there were six impacts recorded. There were an additional 27 incidents occurring off the ball that resulted in 29 VV-HI ≥ 20g (25 with one impact recorded and 2 with two impacts). The hit-up was a play that accounted for approximately 47.1% (n = 215) of all X-patchTM-recorded events. Of the hit-up plays, the forward positions accounted for 62.8% (n = 135) of those impacts, while the back positions accounted for approximately 37.2% (n = 80) of impacts. The tackle accounted for approximately 52.9% (n = 241) of all X-patchTM-recorded events. Of the tackles, the forward positions accounted for 73% (n = 175) of those impacts, while the back positions accounted for approximately 27% (n = 66) of impacts.


This study is the first to analyse video and verify X-patchTM-recorded data in elite youth rugby league players. VV-HI ≥ 20g accounted for 90.4% of all HI ≥ 20g during game time, revealing a high rate of agreement, similar to rates previously recorded in men’s semi-professional rugby league [17]. Cross-verification with a secondary source, such as video review, is highly recommended to reduce false-positive readings that may inflate players’ cumulative and average PLAs across a season. Of particular importance is the risk for fundamentally misinterpreting the highest acceleration readings, because those could be falsely attributed to high energy head impacts. Of the 45 impacts recorded as 80gs or greater, only 35.6% occurred during the game, while 55.6% were outside game time, and 8.9% were recorded while the sensor was known to be detached (Fig. 5). When viewing video footage during one of our prior studies, we saw one example when six 40g or higher “head impacts” (ranging from 40.6 to 58.8g) were recorded after a game when two players were shaking hands and one player tapped the side of the other players head, during the handshake, presumably directly on the sensor [17].

Upon video review, we discovered not all recorded “head impacts” occurred as a result of a direct impact to the head. We recorded 5.2 direct VV-HI ≥ 20g per game hour which is similar to that recorded previously in men’s semi-professional rugby (6.0 direct VV-HI ≥ 20 g/h) [17]. Although the majority of VV-HI ≥ 20g occurred as a result of a direct force to the head (73.2%), the X-patchTM-recorded impacts confirmed by video to be caused by an impulsive force to the head after an impact elsewhere on the body (i.e. chest/torso, shoulder, arm, etc.). The rate of direct VV-HI ≥ 20g was not significantly different between the first and second half, but showed a greater exposure experienced by forwards when compared to backs, consistent with previous literature [17, 32, 33] (Table 4). There was poor agreement in the location and direction of VV-HI ≥ 20g between the X-patchTM and video review. This is consistent with in vivo laboratory findings which found skin-mounted sensors showed large measurement errors, with acceleration peaks in different directions from the same impacts recorded with mouthguard-based sensors [26]. For direct VV-HI ≥ 20g, the X-patchTM accurately recorded the location in 24.9% (n = 103) of impacts, see Table 3. Previously, Kuo and colleagues, using a similar tri-axial linear accelerometer embedded into a mouthguard, reported similarly poor rates of agreement between sensor-recorded and video-identified impacts (37.3%), with impact locations that did not match the visualised head kinematics [34].

Table 4 Frequency of video verified direct head impacts by game time and playing position

It is important that when sensor data are collected, they are closely analysed because there is potential for gross over-estimation of head impacts if not carefully processed to remove triggered events outside of gameplay (Fig. 5) [17, 18]. Of all triggered events ≥ 20g (n = 1,291), only approximately half (n = 624, 48.3%) occurred during the game, with the majority of impacts occurring either before or after the game or after a sensor had become detached from the head (Fig. 4). Upon video review, there were multiple triggered events (n = 22) after the sensor was seen detaching from a player, presumably from the sensor hitting the ground after falling or players stepping on it during the game. On two occasions, after the X-patchTM became dislodged, the players can be clearly visualised placing the sensor in their sock until the conclusion of the game, leading to a large number of triggered events ≥ 20g (n = 199) being recorded from running.

In this study, we employed a video verification approach with two reviewers independently reviewing 60 HI ≥ 20g that occurred during game time that were not verified by video. This was used for quality assurance to verify false-positive readings so that they could be confidently removed from head impact exposure data prior to analysis. Interestingly, upon close review of non-verified impacts, we discovered 33 impacts that occurred while the player was on the sideline. It is unclear how or why these impacts were recorded on the sensors because there was no available video of players on the sidelines. It is possible that these impacts occurred while players were preparing to enter the game by simulating tackles. Previously Cortes and colleagues [18], in a review of impacts in collegiate lacrosse, reported that 99 impacts ≥ 20g occurred on the sideline. This suggests that a secondary source, such as video review, is important when trying to quantify in-game recorded head impacts to ensure reported impacts occurred while the player was involved in the game. If the non-game data is not removed, it would artificially inflate the number of head impacts a player sustains. There were also a number of clear head impacts seen on video review that did not register on the sensor, consistent with previous X-patchTM studies [20, 35]. There were a total of 2399 video-identified impacts to the head or body. Of these, the authors of this study visualised 858 (35.8%) impact events on video review that were either not recorded at all by the sensor, or that registered as less than 10g, of which there were many observable direct head impacts (Fig. 2). The exact number of impacts is difficult to determine and may be higher because this number captures the number of events (e.g. tackles), and multiple impacts may have occurred in each event. We also found a large number of impacts were secondary impacts during tackle events that occurred after the initial contact with 46.3% of all verified impacts coming after the initial impact was seen on video. Of these secondary impacts, 83.8% occurred after the primary impact was either not recorded by the sensor or registered under the 20g threshold. Having multiple impacts in tackle events makes it difficult to determine exactly how many “larger” impacts identifiable on video review were not registered by the X-patchTM.


This study consisted of a relatively small sample size, and no player played all games. Due to faulty equipment at the end of the season, the number of working sensors was less than the number of participating players in each game. Because of this, sensors were given to players likely to play more minutes throughout the game to maximise data collection. Further, due to time and personnel constraints, training sessions and two games throughout the season were unable to be staffed by research personnel; these data underrepresent the total accumulation of head impacts over the course of a full season. Additionally, our statistical analyses (i.e. t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests) were exploratory and should be replicated in larger, more representative samples. Similar to our previous study [17], false-negative incidences only included the initial impact as a single “missed” impact when there likely were more subsequent, or secondary, impacts also not registered by the sensor. Although we double verified each false-positive impact to ensure accuracy, all other impacts were coded by a single researcher creating a possibility of some impacts being missed due to human error.

This study utilised one high-definition sideline video camera that panned across the entire field which limits the ability to accurately verify impacts and signs of concussion. Some impacts may be obstructed from view by another player, and thus, the exact location of some impacts may be inaccurate. Research studies on professional sports with multiple camera angles may be more accurate in analysing video signs of concussion and determining location of verified impacts. Critically, the process for synchronising, and interpreting, the video and X-patchTM data in a sport where continuous impacts are present is challenging. Given the volume of impact data collected from the X-patchTM when no apparent contact was observed (i.e. high sampling rate of the X-patchTM in the absence of verified impact), in combination with a sport that has a high frequency of body contact, it seems likely that the sensor is recording triggered events that are not actually impacts to the head or body [20, 29].


The findings from this study are consistent with previous research, highlighting the importance of using video review as the primary source of information on head impact and supplementing that with X-patchTM-recorded data. That is, the X-patchTM has serious limitations as a primary data source [17, 18, 20, 27]. The current study identified similar high rates of false-positive direct head impacts recorded by the wearable sensors in junior representative rugby league as were previously described in semi-professional men’s rugby league, Australian Football, and collegiate lacrosse respectively. Although there is potential for impact sensors to play an assistive role to medical staff, more research is needed to ensure the accuracy of data collected and to establish their usefulness for injury surveillance. With ongoing improvements in methodology and technology, future impact sensors might provide important information for junior or amateur sports in recording player exposure rates and differentiating between incidental movements and actual collisions.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data generated during the current study are not publicly available due to the institutional human ethics committee approval requirements that “only the researchers listed as investigators on the ethics application will have access to the data” but may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


HI ≥ 20g:

Head impact ≥ 20g


Head injury assessment


Head impact events


Injury management software


National Rugby League


New South Wales


Peak linear acceleration


Peak rotational acceleration


Peak rotational velocity


Standard deviation



VV-HI ≥ 20g:

Video-verified head impact ≥ 20g


  1. 1.

    Gardner AJ, et al. A systematic review of concussion in rugby league. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(8):495–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pfister T, et al. The incidence of concussion in youth sports: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016;50(5):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Purcell L, Harvey J, Seabrook JA. Patterns of recovery following sport-related concussion in children and adolescents. Clinical Pediatrics. 2016;55(5):452–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Daniel RW, Rowson S, Duma SM. Head impact exposure in youth football: middle school ages 12-14 years. J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(9):094501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Davis GA, et al. What is the difference in concussion management in children as compared with adults? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(12):949–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Field M, et al. Does age play a role in recovery from sports-related concussion? A comparison of high school and collegiate athletes. J Pediatr. 2003;142(5):546–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McCrory PR, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport - The 4th international conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Phys Ther Sport. 2013;14(2):e1–e13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kerr ZY, et al. Concussion symptoms and return to play time in youth, high school, and college American Football athletes. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(7):647–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Davis GA, et al. International consensus definitions of video signs of concussion in professional sports. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(20):1264–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Davis GA, et al. International study of video review of concussion in professional sports. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(20):1299–304.

  11. 11.

    O'Connor KL, et al. Head-Impact-Measurement Devices: A Systematic Review. J Athl Train. 2017;52(3):206–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Patton DA, et al. Head Impact Sensor Studies In Sports: A Systematic Review Of Exposure Confirmation Methods. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2020;48(11):2497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gardner AJ, et al. A video analysis of use of the new 'concussion interchange rule' in the national rugby league. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016;37(4):267–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gardner AJ, et al. Evidence of concussion signs in National Rugby League match play: a video review and validation Study. Sports Med Open. 2017;3(1):29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    King DA, et al. Head impacts in a junior rugby league team measured with a wireless head impact sensor: an exploratory analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;19(1):13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    King DA, et al. Head impact exposure from match participation in women's rugby league over one season of domestic competition. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(2):139–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Carey L, et al. Verifying Head Impacts Recorded by a Wearable Sensor using Video Footage in Rugby League: a Preliminary Study. Sports Med Open. 2019;5(1):9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cortes N, et al. Video analysis verification of head impact events measured by wearable sensors. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(10):2379–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    King DA, et al. Similar head impact acceleration measured using instrumented ear patches in a junior rugby union team during matches in comparison with other sports. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;18(1):65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    McIntosh AS, et al. An assessment of the utility and functionality of wearable head impact sensors in Australian Football. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(7):784–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Broglio SP, et al. Head impacts during high school football: a biomechanical assessment. J Athl Train. 2009;44(4):342–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Broglio SP, et al. Cumulative head impact burden in high school football. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(10):2069–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Talavage TM, et al. Functionally-detected cognitive impairment in high school football players without clinically-diagnosed concussion. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(4):327–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Urban JE, et al. Head impact exposure in youth football: high school ages 14 to 18 years and cumulative impact analysis. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(12):2474–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hynes LM, Dickey JP. Is there a relationship between whiplash-associated disorders and concussion in hockey? A preliminary study. Brain Injury. 2006;20(2):179–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wu LC, et al. In vivo evaluation of wearable head impact sensors. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(4):1234–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Caswell SV, et al. Characterizing verified head impacts in high school girls' lacrosse. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(14):3374–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Brennan, J., et al., Accelerometers for the Assessment of Concussion in Male Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Reyes J, et al. An investigation of factors associated with head impact exposure in professional male and female Australian Football players. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(6):1485–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    McCuen E, et al. Collegiate women's soccer players suffer greater cumulative head impacts than their high school counterparts. J Biomech. 2015;48(13):3720–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kindschi K, et al. Video analysis of high-magnitude head impacts in men’s collegiate lacrosse. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017;3(1):e000165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gabbett TJ. Influence of playing position on the site, nature, and cause of rugby league injuries. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research (Allen Press Publishing Services Inc.). 2005;19(4):749–55.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gissane C, et al. Differences in the incidence of injury between rugby league forwards and backs. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1997;29(4):91–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kuo C, et al. Comparison of video-based and sensor-based head impact exposure. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Press JN, Rowson S. Quantifying head impact exposure in collegiate women's soccer. Clin J Sport Med. 2017;27(2):104–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Dr. Andrew Gardner acknowledges salary support from a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship, research grant support from the University of Newcastle’s Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, and unrestricted philanthropic support from the National Rugby League (NRL). Dr. Grant Iverson acknowledges unrestricted philanthropic support from the Mooney-Reed Charitable Foundation, ImPACT® Applications, Inc., the Spaulding Research Institute, and the National Rugby League.


Not applicable. No financial support was received for the conduct of this study or preparation of this manuscript.

Author information




LC conceived the design of the study, collected the study data, and drafted, revised, and finalised the manuscript. DT assisted with the statistical analysis and revised, and finalised the manuscript. GI revised and finalised the manuscript. PS revised and finalised the manuscript. AMc provided extensive revision and finalised the manuscript. AG conceived the design of the study, assisted with the collection of the study data, and drafted, revised, and finalised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Gardner.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was approved by The University of Newcastle’s Human Ethics Committee (reference number: H-2015-0323) and was performed in accordance with the standards of ethics outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable

Competing Interests

The authors, Lauchlan Carey, Peter Stanwell, Andrew McIntosh, Doug Terry, Douglas Terry, Grant Iverson, and Andrew Gardner, declare that they have no competing interests. Dr. Grant Iverson has been reimbursed by the government, professional scientific bodies, and commercial organisations for discussing or presenting research relating to MTBI and sport-related concussion at meetings, scientific conferences, and symposiums. He has a clinical practice in forensic neuropsychology, including expert testimony, involving individuals who have sustained mild TBIs (including athletes). He has received honorariums for serving on research panels that provide scientific peer review of programmes. He is a co-investigator, collaborator, or consultant on grants relating to mild TBI funded by the federal government and other organisations. He has received research support from test publishing companies in the past, including ImPACT® Applications Systems, Psychological Assessment Resources, and CNS Vital Signs. He has received research support from the Harvard Integrated Program to Protect and Improve the Health of NFLPA Members, and a grant from the National Football League. He serves as a scientific advisor for BioDirection, Inc, Sway Medical, Inc., and Highmark, Inc. Dr. Andrew Gardner serves as a scientific advisor for hitIQ, Ltd. He has a clinical practice in neuropsychology involving individuals who have sustained sport-related concussion (including current and former athletes). He has been a contracted concussion consultant to Rugby Australia. He has received travel funding or been reimbursed by professional sporting bodies, and commercial organisations for discussing or presenting sport-related concussion research at meetings, scientific conferences, workshops, and symposiums. Previous grant funding includes the NSW Sporting Injuries Committee, the Brain Foundation (Australia), an Australian-American Fulbright Commission Postdoctoral Award, a Hunter New England Local Health District, Research, Innovation and Partnerships Health Research & Translation Centre and Clinical Research Fellowship Scheme, and the Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), supported by Jennie Thomas, and the HMRI, supported by Anne Greaves. He is currently funded through an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship, and the University of Newcastle’s Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury. He has received unrestricted philanthropic support from the National Rugby League (NRL) for the Retired Players Brain Health research programme.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carey, L., Terry, D.P., McIntosh, A.S. et al. Video Analysis and Verification of Direct Head Impacts Recorded by Wearable Sensors in Junior Rugby League Players. Sports Med - Open 7, 66 (2021).

Download citation


  • Head impacts
  • Rugby league
  • Wearable sensors
  • Accelerometer
  • Video review