Intensity | Authors | % 1-RM | IC | WM | CF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Light (30–49% 1-RM) | Brush et al. [20] | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Naderi et al. [23] | 30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Tsukamoto et al. [60] | 40 | 1 | – | – | |
Number of positive effects | Â | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
Number of outcomes | Â | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
Positive effect (%) | Â | 66.67 | 50.00 | 50.00 | |
Moderate (50–69% 1-RM) | de Almeida et al. [29] | 50 | 1 | – | 1 |
Tsai et al. [61] | 50 | 0 | – | – | |
Brush et al. [20] | 52.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Chang et al. [57] | 52.5 | 1 | – | – | |
Hsieh et al. -1 [27]* | 52.5 | 1 | – | – | |
Hsieh et al. -2 [27]* | 52.5 | 1 | – | – | |
Hsieh et al. -1 [59]* | 52.5 | – | 1 | – | |
Hsieh et al. -2 [59]* | 52.5 | – | 1 | – | |
Naderi et al. [23] | 52.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Wu et al. [26] | 52.5 | – | – | 1 | |
Tsuk et al. [24] | 60 | 1 | – | – | |
Alves et al. [56] | 65 | 1 | – | 0 | |
Number of positive effects | Â | 7 | 3 | 3 | |
Number of outcomes | Â | 9 | 4 | 5 | |
Positive effect (%) | Â | 77.78 | 75.00 | 60.00 | |
Vigorous (70–84% 1-RM) | Chou et al. [21] | 70 | 1 | – | – |
de Almeida et al. [29] | 70 | 1 | – | 1 | |
Wang et al. [25] | 70 | 1 | – | – | |
Brush et al. [20] | 75 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
Chang and Etnier [17] | 75 | 0 | – | 0 | |
Dunsky et al. [58] | 75 | 1 | – | – | |
Lin et al. [22] | 75 | 0 | – | – | |
Palmiere et al. [28] | 75 | 0 | 0 | – | |
Chang et al. [62] | 80 | 0 | – | – | |
Pontifex et al. [18] | 80 | – | 0 | – | |
Tsai et al. [61] | 80 | 0 | – | – | |
Tsukamoto et al. [60] | 80 | 1 | – | – | |
Number of positive effects | Â | 6 | 0 | 1 | |
Number of outcomes | Â | 11 | 3 | 3 | |
Positive effect (%) | Â | 54.54 | 0.00 | 33.33 |