Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: What is the Effect of Changing Running Step Rate on Injury, Performance and Biomechanics? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Study

Study design and setting

Sample

Comparison

Outcome measures

Adams et al. [43]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: verbal (“increase the number of times your foot hits the ground by 10%”)

Speed: self-selected (comfortable)

Footwear: not described

Additional: running watch used for data collection

20 recreational runners (running experience, 11.5 ± 6.9 years; average running distance, 37.3 ± 27.8 km/week)

Preferred step rate versus “high cadence”

Kinetics:

Peak vertical GRF

Braking impulse

Average vertical loading rate

Instantaneous vertical loading rate

Gait:

Step rate

Vertical oscillation

Ground contact time

Allen et al. [22]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, treadmill

Step rate cue: audible and visual metronome

Speed: self-selected (moderate intensity)

Footwear: participant’s own running shoes

40 recreational runners (rearfoot strike pattern)

(age, 36.0 ± 9.1 years; average running distance, 24.9 ± 20.9 mi/week; male, 17; female, 23)

Preferred step rate versus + 5%, + 10%, + 15%

Gait:

Foot strike pattern

Foot inclination

Step rate

Baggaley et al. [44]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: predetermined (3.33 m/s)

Footwear: standardised (Salomen X-Scream 3d)

19 recreational runners

10 females (age, 27 ± 10 years; mass, 66.8 ± 6.9 kg), 9 males (age, 28 ± 8 years; mass, 73.7 ± 8.0 kg)

Preferred step rate versus − 10%, + 10%,

Kinetics:

Peak sacral acceleration

Peak tibial acceleration

Negative hip work

Negative knee work

Negative ankle work

Impact attenuation

Gait:

Step length

Baumgartner et al. [27]

Randomised controlled trial

Setting: laboratory, treadmill (baseline and at 6-week follow-up); overground or treadmill (retraining period)

Step rate cue: visual feedback (wristwatch)

Speed: self-selected

Footwear: participant’s own running shoes

38 recreational runners. 20 experimental (age, 37.7 ± 9.8 years; mass, 80.5 ± 16.6 kg); 18 controls (age, 39.7 ± 14.8 years; mass, 71.6 ± 12.7 kg)

Experimental: preferred step rate + 10%

Control: preferred step rate

Gait:

Stride rate

Note: data collected at baseline and 6-weeks

Bonacci et al. [29]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: not described

Footwear: standardised (control shoe: Asics Gel Cumulus 16; minimalist shoe: Vibram Seeya)

15 recreational runners (age, 32.6 ± 9.6 years; mass, 68.9 ± 11.0 kg; average running distance, 15.6 ± 7.4 km/week; female, 12; male, 3)

Clinical diagnosis of patellofemoral pain

Preferred step rate versus + 10%

Kinematics:

Peak knee flexion angle

Kinetics:

Peak knee extensor moment

Peak patellofemoral joint stress

Peak patellofemoral joint reaction force

Bonacci et al. [28]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: not described

Footwear: standardised (control shoe: Asics Gel Cumulus 16; minimalist shoe: Vibram Seeya)

15 recreational runners (rearfoot strike pattern)

(age, 32.6 ± 9.6 years; mass, 68.9 ± 11.0 kg; average running distance, 15.6 ± 7.4 km/week; female, 12; male, 3)

Clinical diagnosis of patellofemoral pain

Preferred step rate versus + 10%

Approximate entropy:

Hip: flexion/extension, internal rotation/external rotation

Knee: flexion/extension, adduction/abduction, internal rotation/external rotation

Ankle: dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, inversion/eversion, internal rotation/external rotation

Bowerstock et al. [30]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected (equivalent to speed of a 30 min training run)

Footwear: standardised (Saucony Progrid Ride)

19 recreational runners

(rearfoot strike pattern)

10 females (age 22.7 ± 2.5 years; mass, 57.8 ± 7.0 kg); 9 males (age, 22.5 ± 3.1 years; mass, 79.9 ± 7.5 kg)

Preferred step rate versus  − 10%, + 10% (RFS)

Preferred step rate versus  − 10%, + 10% (FFS)

Kinetics:

Vertical GRF

Tibiofemoral joint contact force

Peak force

Braking GRF

Hamstring Peak force

Quadriceps peak force

Gastrocnemius peak force

Hamstring impulse

Hamstring impulse/km

Quadriceps impulse

Quadriceps impulse/km

Gastrocnemius impulse

Gastrocnemius impulse/km

Gait:

Step length

Stance time

Bramah et al. [23]

Case series

Setting: laboratory, treadmill (baseline); overground or treadmill participant selected (retraining period)

Gait retraining programme: 4 weeks

Step rate cue: audible metronome (weeks 1–2) and self-monitored using GPS smartwatch (weeks 3–4)

Speed: self-selected (preferred)

Footwear: participant’s own running shoes

12 runners with patellofemoral pain (age, 39.9 ± 6.5 years; mass, 61.0 ± 6.5 kg; female, 8; male, 4)

Preferred step rate versus + 10%

Clinical:

Worst pain (NRS)

Lower Extremity Functional Scale

Self-reported longest distance run pain-free

Total weekly running volume

Kinematics:

Peak contralateral pelvic drop

Peak hip adduction

Peak hip internal rotation

Peak knee flexion

Gait:

Stride rate

Note: Data collected at baseline, 4-weeks, and 3-months

Busa et al. [31]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected (preferred)

Footwear: standardised (T7 Brooks)

12 recreational runners

(age, 29. 7 ± 4.4 years; mass, 72.1 ± 13.9 kg; female, 4; male, 8)

Preferred step rate versus  − 20%,  − 10%, + 10%, + 20%

Kinetics:

Tibial impact acceleration peak

Head impact acceleration peak

Head active acceleration peak

Tibial signal power magnitude

Tibial signal power magnitude

Head signal power magnitude

Head signal power magnitude

Shock attenuation active phase magnitude

Shock attenuation impact phase magnitude

Gait:

Step rate

Chumanov et al. [32]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected (preferred)

Footwear: not described

45 recreational runners

(age, 32.7 ± 15.5 years; mass, 69.5 ± 13.1 kg; female, 20; male, 25; average running distance, 29.8 ± 15.5 mi/wk)

Preferred step rate versus + 5%, + 10%

Electromyography (stance phase: 0–15% GC; 30–50% GC and swing phase: 70–80% GC; 80–90% GC; 90–100% GC):

Vastus lateralis

Rectus femoris

Tibialis anterior

Medial gastrocnemius

Lateral hamstring

Medial hamstring

Gluteus maximus

Gluteus medius

Clarke et al. [45]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: predetermined (3.8 m/s)

Footwear: not described

10 recreational runners, average running distance (25–135 km/week)

Preferred step rate versus  − 10%,  − 5%, + 5%, + 10%

Kinematics:

Hip (IC)

Knee (IC), max after (IC)

Ankle (IC)

Horizontal foot velocity (IC)

Vertical foot velocity (IC)

Kinetics:

Peak shank deceleration

Gait:

Step rate

Stride length

Relative stride Length

Flight time

Support time

Connick and Li [46]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, standard treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: predetermined (13 km/h)

Footwear: not described

11 trained runners (10 km PB 34.8 min ± 3.1)

(age, 26.4 ± 7.1 years; mass 68.5 ± 8.3 kg; male, 11)

Preferred step rate versus  − 8%,  − 4%, + 4%, + 8%

Electromyography:

Bicep femoris

Vastus lateralis

Gastrocnemius

Dewolf and De Jaeger [24]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: predetermined speed (12 and 14 km/h)

Footwear: not described

20 runners

(age, 22.1 ± 2.2 years; mass, 72.6 ± 11 kg; male, 15; female, 5)

Preferred step rate versus  − 10% (14 km/h)

 

dos Santos et al. [34]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected (comfortable)

Footwear: standardised (Asics Gel-Eq. 5)

31 recreational runners (rearfoot strike pattern)

(age, 27.7 ± 5.4 years; mass 72.1 ± 0.1 kgs; average running distance, 35.7 ± 18.3 km/week; female, 11; male, 20)

Preferred step rate versus + 10%

Kinematics (IC, average stance, peak stance):

Trunk: flexion

Hip: internal rotation, adduction, abduction, flexion

Knee: external rotation, adduction, abduction, flexion

Ankle: plantarflexion, dorsiflexion

dos Santos et al. [33]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected (preferred)

Footwear: not described

19 recreational runners (rearfoot strike pattern)

(age, 28.1 ± 5.0 years; average running distance, 26.6 ± 8.9 km/week; female, 11; male, 8)

Preferred step rate versus + 10%

Kinematics:

Foot strike angle

Trunk flexion angle

Peak knee flexion during stance phase

Kinetics:

Peak GRF

Peak patellofemoral joint stress

Patellofemoral joint stress-time integral

Hip extensor moment (SP)

Plantarflexion moment (SP)

Peak knee extensor moment (SP)

Gait:

Step length

Step rate

Number of steps per km

Garofolini et al. [58]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: real-time biofeedback; vertical bar graph

Speed: 11 km/h

Footwear: standardised (neutral shoe provided)

20 active males

(age, 28.1 ± 2.8 years; mass, 75.8 ± 5.7 kgs)

Preferred step rate versus + 10 to + 15%

Kinetics:

Loading rate

Gait:

Step rate

Foot strike angle

Gerrard and Bonanno [35]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible and visual metronome

Speed: self-selected (equivalent to 20 min of moderate intensity)

Footwear: participant’s own running shoes

32 recreational runners (age, 28.2 ± 8.0 years; mass, 67.5 ± 13.8 kg; average running distance 30.4 ± 2 4.4 km/week; female, 16; male, 16)

Preferred step rate versus  − 10%,  − 5%, + 5%, + 10%

Kinetics:

Max force

Peak pressure

Contact area

Gait:

Contact time

Hafer et al. [47]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, overground (30 m runway)

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected (comfortable)

Footwear: standardised (New Balance 1062)

10 recreational runners (rearfoot strike pattern)

(age, 32.7 ± 7.5 years; mass, 63.9 ± 7.0 kg; female, 8; male, 2)

Preferred step rate versus + 10%

Kinematics:

Excursion (ROM during stance phase) / angle (peak ROM) / time (% of gait cycle when peak angle occurred)

Knee: flexion, internal rotation

Shank: internal rotation

Rearfoot: eversion

Segment coordination (terminal swing; early stance; mid stance; late stance)

Sagittal thigh rotation versus sagittal shank rotation

Sagittal thigh rotation versus transverse shank rotation

Transverse thigh rotation versus transverse shank rotation

Transverse shank rotation versus frontal rearfoot rotation

Coordination variability (terminal swing; early stance; mid stance; late stance)

Sagittal thigh rotation versus sagittal shank rotation

Sagittal thigh rotation versus transverse shank rotation

Transverse thigh rotation versus transverse shank rotation

Transverse shank rotation versus frontal rearfoot rotation

Halvorsen et al. [48]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, treadmill

Step rate cue: visual and audible feedback for initial instructions, and audible feedback only for running trials

Speed: set speed 16 km/h (12-14 km/h for familiarisation and warm-up)

Footwear: not described

16 national level competitive runners, triathletes and orienteers

(age, 28 ± 5 years; mass, 71.7 ± 5.7 kg; male, 16)

Preferred step rate versus  − 10%,  − 5%

Performance

VO2

Blood lactate

RPE (BORG scale)

Heiderscheit et al. [49]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected (equivalent to moderate intensity run)

Footwear: not described

45 recreational runners

(age, 32.7 ± 15.5 years; mass, 69.5 ± 13.1 kg; average running distance 29.8 ± 15.5 km/week; female, 20; male, 25)

Preferred step rate versus  − 10%,  − 5%, + 5%, + 10%

Kinematics:

Hip: peak flexion angle, peak adduction angle, peak internal rotation angle

Knee: IC flexion angle, peak flexion angle

Ankle: IC foot inclination

COM vertical excursion

Kinetics:

Hip: IC extension moment and peak abduction moment, peak internal rotation moment, negative and positive work

Knee: peak extension moment, negative and positive work

Peak vertical GRF

Braking impulse

Impact transient occurrence

Gait:

Step length

Stance duration

Initial contact COM – heel distance

Additional:

RPE

Hobara et al. [25]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: predetermined (2.5 m/s)

Footwear: not described

10 recreational runners

(age, 28.8 ± 3.0 years; mass, 71.5 ± 9.3 kg; male, 10)

Preferred step rate versus  − 30%,  − 15%, + 15%, + 30%

Kinetics:

Vertical GRF

Vertical average loading rate

Vertical impact peak

Vertical instantaneous loading rate

Huang et al. [50]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected

Footwear: participant’s own running shoes

19 recreational runners (15 midfoot strike pattern, 4 rearfoot strike pattern)

(age, 21.7 ± 2.6 years; mass, 68.5 ± 6.3 kg; male, 19)

Preferred step rate versus + 10%

Kinetics:

Peak tibial acceleration

Vertical impact peak GRF

Vertical average loading rate

Vertical instantaneous loading rate

Additional:

Awkwardness (VAS)

Effort (VAS)

Hunter and Smith [42]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory; instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: computer-based metronome

Speed: individual 60 min maximal run pace

Footwear: not described

16 recreational runners

(age, 28 ± 8 years; mass, 70.4 ± 10.5 kg; female, 5; male, 11)

Preferred step rate versus  − 4%,  − 8%, + 4%, + 8%

VO2

Stride frequency

Stiffness

Lenhart et al. [51]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected (preferred)

Footwear: not described

30 recreational runners

(age, 33 ± 14 years; mass, 68.6 ± 10.9 kg; female, 15; male, 15)

Preferred step rate versus  − 10%, + 10%

Data not provided

Kinematics:

Knee flexion angle

Peak knee flexion angle, knee flexion at IC

Kinetics:

Patellofemoral force

Peak patellofemoral force

Patellofemoral stance phase loading rate

Peak patellofemoral loading rate

Peak vertical GRF

Additional:

Peak muscle force

Vastus lateralis

Rectus femoris

Soleus

Patellar tendon

Tibialis anterior

Biceps femoris

Semimembranosus

Medial gastrocnemius (0–40%; 80–99%)

Gluteus medius (0–40%; 80–99%)

Gluteus maximus (0–40%; 80–99%)

0–40% = late stance / early swing

80–99% = late swing

Lenhart et al. [36]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected (preferred)

Footwear: not described

30 recreational runners

(age, 33 ± 14 years; mass, 68.6 ± 10.9 kg; female, 15; male, 15)

Preferred step rate versus  − 10%, + 10%

Kinetics:

Positive and Negative Work

Biceps femoris long head

Semimembranosus

Gluteus maximus

Gluteus medius

Gluteus minimus

Tensor fasciae latae

Rectus femoris

Sartorius

Psoas

Iliacus

Adductor magnus

Adductor brevis

Adductor longus

Piriformis

Performance

Peak muscle forces

Stance and late swing

Biceps femoris long head

Semimembranosus

Gluteus maximus

Gluteus medius

Stance and early swing and late swing

Glutes minimus

Piriformis

Early swing

Tensor fasciae latae

Sartorius

Psoas

Iliacus

Adductor brevis

Adductor longus

Stance

Adductor magnus

Stance and early swing

Rectus femoris

Lenhart et al. [52]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

speed: self-selected (preferred)

Footwear: not described

22 recreational runners

(mass, 71.0 ± 8.8 kg; average running distance 45.5 ± 24.1 km/week; female, 7; male, 15)

Preferred step rate versus  − 10%, + 10%

Kinetics:

Patellofemoral joint contact force

Patellofemoral joint contact area loading rate

Patellofemoral joint contact pressure loading rate

Lieberman et al. [37]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: predetermined (3.0 m/s)

Footwear: not described

14 recreational runners

(mass, 72.9 ± 11.6 kg; female, 2; male, 12)

Step rates: 75, 80, 85, 90, 95 strides/min

Kinematics:

Max hip flexion

Landing position of foot relative to hip

Landing position of foot relative to knee

Kinetics:

Impact peak GRF

Braking impulse

Vertical loading rate

Maximum hip flexion moment

Additional:

Cost of transport

Mercer et al. [53]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: 3 set running speeds: 3.13 m/s, 3.58 m/s, 4.02 m/s

Footwear: not described

10 well-trained runners

(age, 23.0 ± 5.0 years; mass, 66.3 ± 8.8 kg; female, 4; male, 6)

Preferred step rate versus  − 15%, + 15%

(at 3 different pre − determined running speeds)

VO2

Morin et al. [54]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: predetermined (3.33 m/s)

Footwear: not described

10 recreational runners

(age, 28.6 ± 6.4 years; mass, 75.6 ± 10.4 kg; male, 10)

Preferred step rate versus  − 30%, + 30%

Kinematics:

Downward displacement of COM

Kinetics:

Vertical GRF (max)

Leg compression

Vertical stiffness

Leg stiffness

Gait:

Contact time

Aerial time

Duty factor

Neal et al. [55]

Case series

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Gait retraining programme: 18 sessions over 6 weeks

Step rate cue: audible metronome (faded feedback) used in sessions 1–12. No feedback provided in sessions 13–18

Speed: self-selected (preferred)

Footwear: participant’s own running shoes

10 runners with patellofemoral pain (age, 31.6 ± 5.5 years; mass, 67.7 ± 9.8 kg; average running distance, 17.0 ± 9.8 km/week; female, 6; male, 4)

Preferred step rate versus + 7.5%

Clinical:

Average pain (NRS)

Worst pain (NRS)

Kujala Scale (function)

Kinematics:

Peak contralateral pelvic drop

Peak hip adduction

Peak hip internal rotation

Peak hip flexion

Peak knee flexion

Electromyography:

Gluteus maximus

Gluteus medius

Semitendinosus

Vastus medialis oblique

Gait:

Step rate

Note: Data collected at baseline and 6-weeks. Biomechanical data not included in this review as only available for n = 9

Quinn et al. [56]

Case–control study

Setting: laboratory, treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: 3.4 to 3.8 m/s

Footwear: participant’s own running shoes

22 well-trained female runners (step rate < 176 steps/min)

11 experimental (age, 22.9 ± 5.0 years; mass, 58.1 ± 8.3 kg; 5 k PB 19.8 ± 1.4 min); 11 controls (age, 21.3 ± 1.4 years; mass, 58.0 ± 2.5 kg; 5 k PB 19.9 ± 1.6 min)

Preferred step rate versus 180 steps/minute

Gait:

Step frequency

Step length

Additional:

RE

VO2 max

Ventilation

Heart rate

Note: Data collected at baseline and 12-days

Swinnen et al. [26]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected and 12kmp/h

Footwear: not described

17 experienced runners

(age, 23.7 ± 3.8 years; mass, 69.1 ± 7.7 kg; female, 4; male, 13)

Preferred step rate versus  − 15%,  − 8%, + 8%, + 15%

Kinetics:

Average positive ankle power

Average positive knee power

Average positive hip power

Gait:

Stride frequency

Step length

Ground contact time

Duty factor

Additional:

Metabolic energy consumption

Muscle activation

Wang et al. [38]

Randomised controlled trial

Setting: laboratory, treadmill and 10 m runway (baseline testing); overground (retraining programme)

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: 3.33 m/s (baseline testing); self-selected (retraining programme)

Footwear: standardised (Nike Pegasus 34)

30 recreational male runners (rearfoot strike pattern)

12 experimental (age, 23.6 ± 7.5 years; mass, 71.8 ± 4.9 kg); 12 controls (age, 23.7 ± 1.2 years; mass, 70.8 ± 7.3 kg)

Preferred step rate versus + 7.5%

Kinematics:

Time from IC contact to impact peak

Foot angle at IC

Max dorsiflexion during stance

Max knee flexion during stance

Max hip flexion during stance

Vertical excursion of Centre of gravity

Vertical velocity of centre of gravity at IC

Kinetics:

Vertical instantaneous load rate

Vertical average load rate

Lower extremity stiffness

Impact peak (BW)

Gait:

Step rate

Step length

Note: Data collected at baseline and 12-weeks

Wellenkotter et al. [39]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, treadmill

Step rate cue: audible and visual metronome

Speed: self-selected (preferred)

Footwear: standardised (New Balance 625)

38 recreational runners

(age, 23.0 ± 3.5 years; mass, 30.6 ± 4.7 kg; female, 19; male, 19)

Preferred step rate versus  − 5%, + 5%

Kinetics:

Total foot plantar loading

Heel plantar loading

Medial metatarsal plantar loading

Central metatarsal plantar loading

Lateral metatarsal plantar loading

Peak force

Force time integral

Peak pressure

Pressure time integral

Gait:

Contact time

Willy et al. [40]

Randomised control trial

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill (baseline testing)

Overground or treadmill (retraining programme)

Step rate cue: real-time visual feedback (wristwatch) on runs 1–3, 5 and 7 (no feedback on runs 4, 6 and 8)

Speed: self-selected

Footwear: not described

30 recreational runners 16 experimental (age, 251.9 ± 16.3 months; BMI, 23.0 ± 2.6 kg/m2; female 9, male 7); 14 controls (age, 248.8 ± 15 months; BMI, 23.4 ± 3.3 kg/m2; female 9, male 7)

Preferred step rate versus + 7.5%

Kinematics:

Peak hip Adduction

Kinetics:

Vertical ground reaction force

Instantaneous vertical load rate

Average vertical load rate

Eccentric knee work per stance

Eccentric knee work per km

Knee joint power

Gait:

Steps per minute

Note: Data collected at baseline, post retraining period (after 8 runs) and 1-month

Yong et al. [41]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, overground 16.5 m

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: self-selected

Footwear: standardised (Saucony Ride 7)

Additional: participants completed a practice of intervention on a treadmill prior to overground testing

17 recreational runners (rearfoot strike pattern)

(age, 32.1 ± 9.8 years; mass, 64.9 ± 12.5 kg; female, 11; male, 6)

Preferred step rate versus + 10%

Kinematics:

Peak hip adduction angle

Kinetics:

Loading Rate

Peak tibial acceleration

Peak absolute free moment

Zimmerman et al. [57]

Cross-sectional

Setting: laboratory, instrumented treadmill

Step rate cue: audible metronome

Speed: predetermined (10 km/h)

Footwear: participant’s own running shoes

12 recreational runners

Clinical diagnosis of exercise related leg pain

Step rate = 180

Kinetics:

Heel max GRF

Midfoot max GRF

Forefoot max GRF

Heel max pressure midfoot max pressure forefoot max pressure

Gait:

Stride length

Step rate

  1. GRF ground reaction force, BW body weight, IC initial contact, SP stance phase, COM centre of mass, VAS visual analogue scale, NRS numerical rating scale, PB personal best