Match Analysis in Team Ball Sports: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Sarmento, Hugo; Clemente, Filipe Manuel; Afonso, José; Araújo, Duarte; Fachada, Miguel; Nobre, Paulo; Davids, Keith

doi:10.1186/s40798-022-00454-7

Sports Medicine - Open

Table 1 AMSTAR 2 assessment of each included systematic review

From: Match Analysis in Team Ball Sports: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Study	AMSTAR 2—ITEMS																Overall items
Study	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	Overall items
Courel-Ibáñez et al. [18]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	PY	No	No	No MA	No MA	No	No	No MA	Yes	Critically low
Maimón et al. [19]	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	No	No	No MA	No MA	No	No	No MA	Yes	Critically low
Reina et al. [20]	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	No	No	No MA	Yes	Critically low
Medeiros et al. [21]	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	PY	No	No	No MA	No MA	No	No	No MA	Yes	Critically low
Bujalance-Moreno et al. [22]	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	No	No MA	Yes	Critically low
Clemente and Sarmento [23]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	No	No MA	Yes	Low
Clemente et al. [24]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	No	No MA	Yes	Low
Field et al. [25]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	PY	PY	Yes	No MA	No MA	Yes	No	No MA	Yes	Low
Goes et al.[26]	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes	PY	No	No	No MA	No MA	No	No	No MA	Yes	Critically low
Low et al. [3]	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	Yes	No MA	Yes	Critically low
Sarmento et al. [27]	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No	PY	No	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	No	No MA	Yes	Critically low
Sarmento et al. [28]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	Yes	No MA	Yes	Low
Sarmento et al. [5]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	Yes	No MA	Yes	Low
Vieira et al. [29]	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	No	No MA	Yes	Moderate
Agras et al. [30]	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	No	No	PY	No	No	No MA	No MA	No	No	No MA	No	Critically low
Rico-González et al. [31]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	No	No MA	Yes	Low
Ferrari et al. [32]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	No	No MA	Yes	Low
Ferraz et al. [33]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	No	No MA	Yes	Low
Colomer et al. [34]	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	Yes	PY	No	No	No MA	No MA	No	No	No MA	Yes	Critically low
Glassbrook et al. [35]	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	PY	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Moderate
Hausler et al.[36]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Moderate
Silva et al. [37]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	PY	No	No	No MA	No MA	Yes	No	No MA	No	Critically low
Harper et al. [38]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	High
Fernández-Espínola et al. [39]	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	PY	PY	No	No MA	No MA	No	No	No MA	Yes	Critically low

PY—Partial Yes; No MA—No Meta-analysis; Description of AMSTAR-2 Items: 1—Did the research questions and inclusion criteria for the review include the components of PICO?; 2—Did the report of the review contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and did the report justify any significant deviations from the protocol?; 3—Did the review authors explain their selection of the study designs for inclusion in the review?; 4—Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy?; 5—Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate?; 6—Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate?; 7—Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions?; 8—Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate detail?; 9—Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies that were included in the review?; 10—Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review?; 11—If meta-analysis was performed did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results?; 12—If meta-analysis was performed, did the review authors assess the potential impact of RoB in individual studies on the results of the meta-analysis or other evidence synthesis?; 13—Did the review authors account for RoB in individual studies when interpreting/discussing the results of the review?; and 14—Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review?; 15—If they performed quantitative synthesis did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review?; 16—Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review?

Back to article page