Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics: cross-sectional studies

From: Acute and Chronic Physical Activity Increases Creative Ideation Performance: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-analysis

Study

Year

Participants

Age (mean, SD/range)

Creative ideation task

Physical activity measure

Study quality

Cantarero and Carranque [67]

2016

n = 40

32.95 (9.07)

Creative imagination test for adults [68]

International physical activity questionnaire [69]

3

Cavallera et al. [70]

2011

n = 61

21.64 (2.85)

Torrance test of creative thinking [71]

Hours of sport activity per week

4

Chen et al. [72]

2021

n = 40

22.98 (1.95)

Alternate uses test [73]

International physical activity questionnaire [69]

4

Latorre Román et al. [74]

2017

n = 308

9.72 (1.25)

Creative imagination test for children [75]

Fitness-test battery (20 m running speed)

4

Perchtold-Stefan et al. [76]

2020

n = 98

23.06 (3.40)

Verbal imagination subscales of Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-test [77]

test for creative thinking-drawing production [78]

Freiburger questionnaire on physical activity [79]

4

Piya-Amornphan et al. (1–3) [80]

2020

n1 = 521

n2 = 487

n3 = 439

6–9

1–13

14–17

Test for creative thinking-drawing production [78]

Thailand physical activity children survey-the student Questionnaire [81]

3

Rominger et al. [43]

2020

n = 79

22.95 (3.34)

Alternate use task [73]

Torrance test of creative thinking [71]

Tri-axial acceleration sensors (counts/min)

5

  1. n number of participants, ni number of participants in the independent subsample i, numbers in parentheses designate the independent subsamples i, e.g., Piya-Amornphan et al. (1–3)