Author/Year | Aim | Study population | Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Business | |||
D'Innocenzo et al. (2021) [47] | To test (i) whether shared leadership and performance were related over time, (ii) the relative magnitude of those relationships, (iii) whether a shared leadership intervention changes those relationships | 205 Members of 53 student teams in business | Shared leadership to performance relationship was positively related and grew stronger with intervention |
Doghri et al. (2021) [48] | Analyse the influence of empowerment leadership and its mechanism of effect | 250 Start up businesses | Shared leadership and knowledge sharing had a positive relationship on performances |
Cicero and Pierro (2007) [39] | Analyse leadership and work outcomes as they are associated to social identification processes | 200 Italian public and private sector employees | Positive association between charismatic leadership and employees’ work-group identification; work-group identification is also associated with their job involvement, job satisfaction, performance, and turnover intention |
Payne et al. (2009) [45] | Identify five attributes of high-performing teams—knowledge, information, power, incentives and opportunity/time—and how they influence corporate financial performance | 210 Fortune 1000 companies | Team effectiveness attributes are associated with higher levels of board effectiveness as rated by the board directors, and that board effectiveness is significantly related to corporate financial performance |
Military | |||
Stewart and Johnson (2009) [46] | Test a moderator of the association between diversity and work group performance: leader–member exchange (LMX) | 224 High-ranking officers | Leader-member exchange interacted with work group gender diversity, such that in more gender diverse groups leader–member exchange differentiation was positively associated with work group performance when aggregate leader–member exchange was high (above the median) |
Health and social care | |||
Kane and Borgatti (2011) [42] | Examine if groups will perform better if their more proficient members are highly central in the group’s communication and workflows network | 468 Employees (32 teams) | Centrality–Information System proficiency alignment is significantly and positively related to performance across multiple systems examined individually and with the portfolio of systems examined |
Kickul and Neuman (2000) [43] | Investigate the individual differences in emergent leadership behaviours and their relationships to teamwork processes and outcomes | 320 Psychology students | Openness to experience and cognitive ability were predictive of emergent leadership behaviours. Conscientiousness and cognitive ability were associated with team performance |
Multiple sectors | |||
Bunderson, van der Vegt et al. (2016) [38] | Explore whether hierarchy can promote group performance and member satisfaction | 75 Teams | Acyclicity in influence relations reduces conflict and thereby enhances both group performance and member satisfaction, centralisation and steepness have negative effects on conflict, performance, and satisfaction, particularly in groups that perform complex tasks |
DeChurch and Marks (2006) [40] | Leader strategising and coordinating effects on functional leadership, inter team coordination, and multiteam systems performance were examined | 384 Undergraduate students | Functional leadership mediated the effects of both types of training on inter team coordination and inter team coordination fully mediated the effect of multiteam system leadership on multiteam system performance |
Lyubovnikova et al. (2017) [44] | Examine how authentic leadership influences team performance via the mediating mechanism of team reflexivity | 53 Teams | Self-regulatory behaviours inherent in the process of authentic leadership served to collectively shape team behaviour, manifesting in the process of team reflexivity, which, in turn, positively predicted team performance |
Han et al. (2018) [41] | Investigate how an organisation's high-performance work system affects team managers' transformational leadership | 179 Teams in 44 organisations | Multilevel, moderated mediation effect with the indirect effect of high-performance work system on team performance via transformational leadership varies significantly as a function of adaptation and efficiency orientations |