Skip to main content

Table 1 Study designs, USPSTF quality rating, analysis methods, and outcome measures assessed

From: The Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Warmups for Lower Extremity Injury Prevention in Basketball: A Systematic Review

Study

Study design

USPSTF quality rating

Analysis method

Outcome measures assessed

All lower-extremity injuries

Ankle injuries

ACL injuries

Knee injuries (general)

Balance interventions

McGuine et al. [21]

Cluster RCT

Good quality

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model of incidence rates

 

X

  

Cumps et al. [19]

Non-randomized controlled trial

Fair quality

T-test of relative risk

 

X

  

Emery et al. [29]

Cluster RCT

Good quality

Multivariate Poisson regression of relative risk

X

X

  

Eils et al. [28]

Cluster RCT

Good quality

Logistic regression of odds ratio

 

X

  

Riva et al. [22]

Prospective cohort

Poor quality

ANOVA of incidence rates

Xa

X

 

X

Multicomponent interventions

Hewett et al. [31]

Non-randomized controlled trial

Fair quality

χ2 of incidence rates

  

X

 

Pfeiffer et al. [34]

Non-randomized controlled trial

Fair quality

Exact test of odds ratio

  

Xa

 

LaBella et al. [20]

Cluster RCT

Fair quality

Exact test of incidence rates

Xa

Xa

 

Xa

Longo et al. [32]

Cluster RCT

Fair quality

Exact test of odds ratio

X

X

 

X

Aerts et al. [26]

Cluster RCT

Good quality

Multilevel Cox proportional hazards model of hazard ratio

X

   

Bonato et al. [27]

Cluster RCT

Good quality

χ2 of incidence rates

Xa

X

X

X

Foss et al. [30]

Cluster RCT

Fair quality

Mixed-model comparison of incidence rates

Xa

X

 

X

Omi et al. [33]

Prospective Cohort

Poor quality

χ2 of relative risk

  

X

 
  1. X: reported in original study
  2. Xa: not reported in original study, but a basketball-specific risk ratio could be computed based on basketball-specific numbers of injuries and athletes