Study | Risk of bias assessment of the studies | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | Overall risk of bias rating (%) | |
Aasa et al. 2015 [30] | + | + | – | n/a | n/a | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 77 |
Atalay et al. 2017 [36] | + | – | – | n/a | n/a | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 62 |
Cai et al. 2015 [31] | + | + | + | n/a | n/a | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 85 |
Cortell-Tormo et al. 2018 [14] | + | + | + | n/a | n/a | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 77 |
Hurley et al. 2015 [32] | + | + | – | n/a | n/a | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 77 |
Jackson et al. 2010 [33] | – | + | + | n/a | n/a | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 69 |
Kell et al. 2009 [34] | – | + | + | n/a | n/a | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 77 |
Suh et al. 2019 [35] | + | – | – | n/a | n/a | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 69 |
Number of studies with a “yes” response | 6 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |