Table 6 Summary of included original studies investigating ‘adherence and outcome’
Author (year) | Design | Population | Investigation | Adherence measure | OM assessment (months) | OMs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Age (mean) | Sex | Graft | Activity level | ||||||
Brewer et al. (2004) [63] | Prospective | 108 | 29.4 | M 72 F 30 | Not stated | Not stated | Adherence to clinic and home-based rehabilitation in the first 6 weeks | Adherence to appointments (% attended of scheduled) Adherence to home-exercise prescription (self-report diary and hidden tape play counter) Adherence during appointments (SIRAS) | 6 | Single leg hop for distance, Lachmans, KOOS-SAS |
Brewer et al. (2000) [62] | Prospective | 95 | 26.9 | M 67 F 28 | Not stated | Competitive (52%) Recreational (43%) Non-athletes (3%) | Adherence to clinic and home-based rehabilitation In the first 6 months | Adherence to appointments (% attended of scheduled) Adherence to home-exercise prescription (0–10 self-report adherence) Adherence during appointments (SIRAS) | 6 | Lysholm knee score, KT-1000, single hop for distance |
Levinger et al. (2017) [61] | Pilot RCT | 17 | 32.2 | M 9 F 8 | Not stated | Not stated | Adherence to a web informational support service | Adherence to recommended website usage (% out of 22) | 3 | KOOS, K-SES, FABQ, TSK-SF, IPAQ, qualitative interview |
Pizzari et al. (2005) [64] | Prospective | 68 | 28.8 | M 48 F 26 | HS/BPTB | Competitive (63%) | Adherence to clinic and home-based rehabilitation in the first 8 weeks | Adherence to appointments (% attended of scheduled) Adherence during appointments (SIRAS) Adherence to home-exercise prescription (self-report diary, % exercises completed) | 9-12 | IKDC knee evaluation form, IKDC subjection knee evaluation, CKRS, KOOS, 6m timed hop, triple crossover hop for distance |