Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of the included trial-based economic evaluations

From: Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Musculoskeletal Conditions Offered by Physiotherapists: A Systematic Review of Trial-Based Evaluations

Study ID

Patients' characteristics

Country

Study design, type of economic analysis

Cost perspective

Effect measure

Time horizon

Spine

Back

      

A Barker et al. 2019 [17]

B Barker et al. 2020 [18]

n = 615

Mean age: 72

Female: 86%

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture

UK

RCT (PROVE-trial)

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective,

Societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Müller et al. 2019 [71]

n = 2324 patients

Back pain

DE

Prospective cohort study

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective, sick leave

Pain intensity (Graded chronic back pain status)

24 months

Søgaard et al. 2008 [84]

n = 90

lumbar spinal fusion

DK~

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

Pain- and disability index scales of the low back pain rating scale

24 months

Low back pain

      

Aboagye et al. 2015 [14]

n = 159

female: (i1) 72% (i2) 62% (c) 80%

LBP

SE

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

QALY (EQ -5D)

12 months

Ankjær-Jensen et al. 1994 [15]

n = 172

Mean age: 44

LBP (herniated disc)

DK

Retrospective cohort study

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

Low back pain rating scale

(i) 12 months

c) 22 months

Apeldoorn et al. 2012 [16]

n = 156

Mean age: (i) 43 (c) 42

LBP (chronic)

NL

RCT

cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Bello et al. 2015 [21]

n = 62

Mean age: (i) 43 (c) 45

LBP (chronic)

GH

Feasibility intervention

NA

Healthcare perspective

SF-36, numeric rating scale

3 months

Burton et al. 2004 [26]

n = 1287

LBP (non-specific)

UK

RCT

Cost-utility, cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ -5D)

12 months

Canaway et al. 2018 [27]

n = 220

Mean age: 42

LBP

IL

Prospective cohort study

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

QALY (SF-12)

12 months

Carr et al. 2005 [28]

n = 237

Mean age: (i) 42 (c) 43

LBP

UK

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

RMDQ

12 months

Cherkin et al. 1998 [29]

n = 321,

Mean age: 41

LBP (chronic) [12+ weeks]

US

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

Bothersomeness of symptoms, RDS

Short-term: 3 months

Long-term: 12–24 months

Critchley et al. 2007 [32]

n = 150

Mean age: 44

Female: (i1) 71% (i2) 62% (c) 69%

LBP (acute) [symptoms < 90 days]

UK

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

18 months

Fritz et al. 2008 [38]

n = 471

Mean age: 41

LBP (acute) [without clinical signs of nerve root, symptoms < 16 days]

US

Case–control

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

OSW, pain rating

24 months

Fritz et al. 2017 [39]

n = 220

Mean age: (i) 38 (c) 37

LBP [symptoms for 6 weeks to 6 months]

US

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Hahne et al. 2017 [43]

n = 300

Mean age: (i) 43 (c) 46

LBP (chronic) [symptoms 6+ weeks]

AU

RCT

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Herman et al. 2008 [45]

n = 75

LBP [symptoms for 4+ weeks]

US

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Main: societal perspective; additional: employer, participant

QALY (SF-6D)

6 months

Hlobil et al. 2007 [46]

n = 134 [sick-listed worker]

mean age: (i) 39 (c) 37

LBP (chronic)

NL

RCT

Cost–benefit

Societal perspective

Lost productivity days

36 months

Hurley et al. 2015 [50]

n = 246

LBP [symptoms 3+ months]

IE

RCT

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Johnson et al. 2007 [55]

n = 234

LBP

UK

RCT

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Karjalainen et al. 2003 [57]

n = 164

mean age: (i1) 44 (i2) 44 (c) 43

[25–61 y.]

LBP

FI

RCT

Cost–benefit

Healthcare perspective

Bothersomeness and frequency of pain, daily symptoms, generic health-related quality of life, intensity of pain, ODI, sick leave,

12 months

Kim et al. 2020 [59]

n = 56 [BMI 17–30]

Mean age: (i) 48 (c) 39

Female: (i) 25% (c) 29%

LBP (chronic)

KR

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

Functional rating index, Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire, VAS

3 weeks

A Niemistö et al. 2003 [72]

B Niemistö et al. 2005 [73]

n = 204

Mean age: (i) 37 (c) 37 [24–46]

LBP (subacute and chronic) [symptoms 6+ weeks]

FI

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

A VAS

B ODI, VAS

A 12 months

B 24 months

Rivero-Arias et al. 2006 [77]

n = 286

mean age: (i) 42 (c) 40

LBP (chronic) [symptoms 3+ months]

UK

RCT

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective, societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Smeets et al. 2009 [83]

n = 160

Mean age: (i1) 43 (i2) 42 (c) 43

LBP

NL

RCT

Cost-effectiveness,

cost-utility

Societal perspective

RMDQ, QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Suni et al. 2018 [87]

n = 219 [health professionals]

Female: 100%

LBP (chronic)

FI

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective, sick leave

QALY (SF-6D)

12 months

van der Roer et al. 2008 [93]

n = 114 [have a health insurance with company AGIS]

LBP [symptoms < 12 weeks]

NL

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

General perceived effect (6-point-scale), pain-rating-scale, EQ-5D, RMDQ

12 months

Whitehurst et al. 2007 [95]

n = 299

LBP (chronic)

UK

RCT

cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

Healthcare perspective

RMDQ, QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Neck

      

Bosmans et al. 2011 [24]

n = 146

Neck pain (subacute)

NL

RCT

Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

Societal perspective

Patient perceived recovery, QALY (SF-6D)

12 months

Korthals-de Bos et al. 2003 [62]

n = 183

Neck pain

NL~

RCT

Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

Societal perspective

EQ, functional disability, pain intensity, patient perceived recovery

12 months

Leininger et al. 2016 [63]

n = 241

Mean age: 73

Neck pain (chronic) [symptoms 3+ months]

US

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

QALY (SF-6D)

12 months

Lewis et al. 2007 [64]

n = 350

Female: 63% (in total)

Neck disorders (non-specific)

UK

RCT

Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

Healthcare perspective, societal perspective

Northwick Park Questionnaire, QALY (EQ-5D)

6 months

Manca et al. 2006 [68]

n = 268

Female: (i) 62% (c) 66%

Neck pain [musculoskeletal origin, symptoms 2+ weeks]

UK

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

3 months,

12 months

Van Dongen et al. 2016 [94]

n = 181

Female: (i) 62% (c) 62%

neck pain (subacute and chronic)

NL

RCT

cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

Societal perspective

Neck Disability Index—Dutch Version, patient's perceived recovery

12 months

Others/mixed

      

Denninger et al. 2018 [34]

n = 447

Female: 72%

Back pain or neck pain

US

Retrospective cohort

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

EQ-5D, NPRS, Oswestry Disability Index/Neck Disability Index, Patient Health Questionnaire-4

24 months

Manca et al. 2007 [67]

n = 315

Back pain or neck pain

[non-systematic origin, symptoms 2+ weeks]

UK

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

A Skargren et al. 1997 [82]

B Skargren et al. 1998 [81]

n = 323

Mean age: (i) 41 c) 41

back or neck pain

SE

RCT

Cost–benefit

Healthcare perspective

General Health (scale), ODS, VAS

A 6 months

B 12 months

Upper limb

      

Bergman et al. 2010 [23]

n = 142

Shoulder complaints

NL

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

Patient perceived recovery

6 months

Commbes et al. 2016 [30]

n = 154

Female: (i1) 36 (i2) 39 (c1) 38 (c2) 38

epicondylitis lateralis [> 6 weeks duration]

AU

RCT

Cost-utility

Societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Fernandez-de-Las-penjas et al. 2019 [37]

n = 120

Female: 100%

Carpal tunnel syndrom

ES

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Geraets et al. 2006 [41]

n = 176

Shoulder complaints (chronic)

NL

RCT

Cost–benefit

Societal perspective

EQ-5D, main complaints, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire

12 months

Hopewell et al. 2021 [48]

n = 708

Rotator cuff disease

UK

RCT

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

James et al. 2005 [53]

n = 207

Shoulder pain [new episode]

UK

RCT

Cost-consequences

Healthcare perspective

Disability score, EQ-5D

6 months

Korthals-de Bos et al. 2004 [61]

n = 183

Epicondylitis lateralis

NL

RCT

Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

Societal perspective

Cost effectiveness: general improvement, pain during the day, PFFQ

cost-utility: EQ

12 months

Struijs et al. 2006 [86]

n = 180

Epicondylitis lateralis [symptoms 6+ weeks]

NL

RCT

Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

Societal perspective

EQ, pain-free function questionnaire, pain most serious complaint, severity of complaint, success rate

12 months

Lower limb

      

Hip

      

Fusco et al. 2019 [40]

n = 80

Female: 0%

Hip replacement

UK

RCT

Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Griffin et al. 2022 [42]

n = 358

Mean age: (i) 35 (c) 35

Female: (i) 42% (c) 36% femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

UK

RCT (UK FASHioN RCT)

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective, societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Juhakoski et al. 2011 [56]

n = 118

Mean age: (i) 67 (c) 66

Female: (i) 68% (c) 72%

Hip osteoarthritis

FI

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

SF-36, WOMAC

24 months

Tan et al. 2016 [88]

n = 203

Mean age: (i) 65 (c) 67

Female: (i) 62% (c) 55%

Hip osteoarthritis

NL

RCT

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective, societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Knee

      

Barton et al. 2009 [20]

n = 389

Female: 66% (in total)

Knee pain

[BMI >  = 28; age = 45+]

UK

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

24 months

Bennell et al. 2016 [22]

n = 222 [50+]

Knee osteoarthritis

AU

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Eggerding et al. 2021 [35]

n = 167

Mean age: (i) 31 (c) 31

ACL tear [recent ACL tear, max. 2 month ago]

NL+

RCT

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective,

Societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

24 months

Ho-Henriksson et al. 2022 [47]

n = 69

Female: (i) 60% (c) 68%

Knee osteoarthritis

SE

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Health care perspective, societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Huang et al. 2012 [49]

n = 243

Mean age: (i) 70 (c) 71

Female: (i) 70% (c) 74%

Total knee replacement [unilateral TKA, due to OA]

TW

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

Knee ROM, Length of stay, VAS

5 days

A Hurley et al. 2007 [52]

B Hurley et al. 2012 [51]

n = 418

Mean age: (i1) 66 (i2) 68 (c) 67 [50+]

female: (i1) 25% (i2) 22% (c) 23%

Knee pain (chronic) [symptoms 6+ months]

UK

A RCT (ESCAPE-Knee-Study)

Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

B RCT (ESCAPE-Knee-Study)

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective, social care payer perspective

A WOMAC, QALY (EQ-5D)

B WOMAC

A 6 months

B 30 months

Jessep et al. 2009 [54]

n = 64

Mean age: (i) 66 (c) 67

[> 50]

Female: (i) 63% (c) 76%

Knee pain (chronic)

UK

RCT

Cost–benefit

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Kigozi et al. 2018 [58]

n = 514

Knee osteoarthritis

UK

RCT (BEEP-trial)

Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

18 months

Knoop et al. 2023 [60]

n = 328

Mean age: (i) 66 (c) 64

[40–85]

Female: (i) 63% (c) 64%

Knee osteoarthritis

NL

RCT

Cost-utility

Societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

McCarthy et al. 2004 [69]

n = 214

Knee osteoarthritis

UK

RCT (GRASP-RCT)

cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Mitchell et al. 2005 [70]

n = 114

Mean age: (i) 70 (c) 71

Total knee replacement

UK

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

SF-36, WOMAC

15 months

Pryymachenko et al. 2021 [75]

n = 75

Female: (i1) 63% (i2) 67% (i3) 63% (c) 58%

Knee osteoarthritis

NZ

RCT (MOA2-Trial)

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective, societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

24 months

Rhon et al. 2022 [76]

n = 156

Female: (i) 37% (c) 38%

Knee osteoarthritis

US

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Sevick et al. 2000 (ex) [78]

n = 439

Mean age: (i1) 69 (i2) 68 (c) 69 [60+]

Female: (i1) 69% (i2) 73% (c) 69%

Knee osteoarthritis

US

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective

Car task, lifting and carrying task, Self-reported disability score, stair climb, 6-min walking distance

18 months

Sevick et al. 2009 [80]

n = 316

Mean age: (i1) 68 (i2) 69 (i3) 69 (c) 69

Female: (i1) 72% (i2) 74% (i3) 74% (c) 68%

Knee osteoarthritis

US~

RCT (ADAPT-trial)

Cost-effectiveness

Payer perspective

Stair climb, weight, WOMAC function, WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, 6-min walk

18 months

Stan et al. 2015 [85]

n = 90

Age mean: (i) 67 (c1) 64 (c2) 65 [60+]

Female: 70% (in total)

Knee osteoarthritis [varus deformity, Ahlback score 3, 4 or 5]

RO

Controlled trial

Cost-effectiveness

Payer perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

Uncertain

Tan et al. 2010 [89]

n = 131

Mean age: (i) 25 (c) 23

Female: (i) 65% (c) 64%

Patellofemoral pain syndrome

NL

RCT

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective, societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

van de Graaf et al. 2020 [90]

n = 319

Meniscal tear [non-obstructive]

NL

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

International Knee Documentation Committee, QALY (EQ-5D)

24 months

van der Graaff et al. 2023 [92]

n = 99

Mean age: (i) 36 (c) 34

[18–45]

Female: (i) 26% (c) 23%

meniscal tear (traumatic)

NL

RCT

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective, societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

24 months

Others/mixed

      

A Abbott et al. 2019 [13]

B Pinto et al. 2013 [74]

n = 206

Mean age: (i1) 67 (i2) 67 (i3) 66 (c) 66

Female: (i1) 32% (i2) 28% (i3) 29% (c) 25%

Hip osteoarthritis, knee osteoarthritis

NZ

A RCT (MOA-RCT)

Cost-effectiveness

B RCT (MOA-RCT)

Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility

A Societal perspective

B Healthcare perspective, societal perspective

A QALY (SF-6D)

B OMERACT-OARSI responder, QALY (SF-12v2), WOMAC

A 24 months

B 12 months

Bulthuis et al. 2008 [25]

n = 85

Mean age: (i) 69 (c) 69

Female: (i) 42% (c) 28%

Hip osteoarthritis, knee osteoarthritis

NL

RCT (DAPPER-study)

Cost-utility, cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

Functional ability, MACTAR and EPMROM

6 months

Coupé et al.‚ 2007 [31]

n = 200

Female: (i) 75% (c) 79%

Hip osteoarthritis, knee osteoarthritis

NL

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Societal perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

15 months

Fernandes et al. 2017 [97]

n = 165

Mean age: (i) 68 (c) 67

Total hip replacement, total knee replacement

DK

RCT

Cost-utility

Healthcare perspective

HOOS, KOOS, QALY (EQ-5D)

12 months

Lin et al. 2008 [66]

n = 94

Mean age: (i) 43 (c) 41

Female: (i) 26% (c) 17%

Ankle fracture [treated with cast immobilization, with or without surgery before]

AU

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective, patient perspective

Assessment of Quality of Life, Lower Extremity Functional Scale

5,5 months

Other conditions

      

Barnhoorn et al. 2018 [19]

n = 56

Mean age: 44 [18–80]

Complex regional pain syndrome type 1

NL

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective, travel costs

QALY (EQ-5D)

9 months

Daker-White et al. 1999 [33]

n = 481

Musculoskeletal problems

UK

RCT

Cost-effectiveness

Healthcare perspective, patient perspective

Disease Repercussions Profile, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain—Visual Analogue Scale, SF-36

5–6 months

Heij et al. 2022 [44]

n = 292

Female: (i) 60 (c) 62

Mean age: (i) 82 (c) 81

Mobility problems

NL

RCT

Cost-consequences, cost-utility

Healthcare perspective

QALY (EQ-5D)

6 months

Lilje et al. 2014 [65]

n = 78

Mean age: (i) 38 (c) 45

Mixed (on a waiting list for surgery regarding neck, shoulder/arm, back, pelvis/hip, knee or leg/foot condition)+

SE

RCT

Cost-consequences

Healthcare perspective

QALY (SF-6D)

12 months

Sevick et al. 2000 (life) [79]

n = 235(+)

Sedentary adults

US

RCT (Project ACTIVE)

Cost-effectiveness

Practicing clinician

Blood pressure, heart rate, peak VO 2 (mL/kg/min), Physical Activity Recall), total treadmill time, weight

6 months,

24 months

Van den Hout et al. 2005 [91]

n = 300

Female: 79%

Rheumatoid arthritis

NL

RCT (RAPIT-study)

Cost-utility

Societal perspective

HAQ, MACTAR, QALY (EQ-5D, SF-6D, VAS)

24 months

  1. +information found in an additional paper, ~assumption of the authors, […] inclusion criteria, —not applicable, NA not available, (i) intervention, (c) control intervention, A, B publications based on the same conducted study
  2. AU Australia, DE Germany, DK Denmark, ES Spain, FI Finland, GH Ghana, IE Ireland, IL Israel, KR South-Korea, NL Netherlands, NZ New-Zealand, RO Romania, SE Sweden, TW Taiwan, UK United Kingdom, US United States of America, LBP low back pain, EPMROM Escola Paulista de Medicina Range of Motion scale, EQ EuroQol, HAQ Health assessment Questionnaire, HOOS Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, KOOS The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, MACTAR McMaster Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Questionnaire, NPRS Numeric Pain Rating Scale, ODI Oswestry Disability Index, OMERACT-OARSI Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International, OSW Osteoporosis Screening in Older Women, PFFQ Pain Free Function Questionnaire, QALY Quality-Adjusted Life Years, RDS Roland Disability score, RDQ Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire, ROM Range of motion, SF Short Form questionnaire, VAS Visual Analogue Scale, WOMAC The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index