Skip to main content

TableĀ 6 Correlations between neurocognitive function and landing kinematics

From: Knee Biomechanics During Neurocognitively Challenged Drop Landings in Male Elite Soccer Players with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Variables

Correlation coefficients

Ī” of group correlations: p (z-value)

Full dataset

CON group

ACLR group

Verbal memory

FLX

Max

0.01

0.15

0.07

0.42 (0.19)

Min

0.09

0.26

0.03

0.28 (0.57)

Mean

0.03

0.18

0.00

0.32 (0.44)

VLG

Max

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.33

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.22

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.42

0.19 (0.86)

Min

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.00

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.05

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.37

0.20 (0.82)

Mean

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.20

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.00

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.57*

0.05 (1.58)*

TIBIA ROT

Max

0.02

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.13

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.12

0.49 (0.02)

Min

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.15

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.28

0.16

0.13 (1.10)

Mean

0.18

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.12

0.09

0.30 (0.52)

Visual memory

FLX

Max

0.33

0.04

0.51*

0.10 (1.28)

Min

0.10

0.28

0.25

0.46 (0.07)

Mean

0.35

0.13

0.53*

0.04 (1.12)*

VLG

Max

0.00

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.20

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.28

0.41 (0.20)

Min

0.00

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.18

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.06

0.38 (0.29)

Mean

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.01

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.05

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.17

0.38 (0.29)

TIBIAL ROT

Max

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.55*

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.49*

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.58*

0.37 (0.31)

Min

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.35*

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.27

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.40

0.36 (0.36)

Mean

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.08

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.33

0.10

0.13 (1.09)

Processing speed

FLX

Max

0.09

0.14

0.25

0.39 (0.28)

Min

0.64*

0.41

0.63*

0.22 (0.74)

Mean

0.19

0.26

0.31

0.44 (0.13)

VLG

Max

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.22

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.25

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.15

0.39 (0.25)

Min

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.23

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.19

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.12

0.43 (0.17)

Mean

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.07

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.01

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.09

0.42 (0.19)

TIBIAL ROT

Max

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.01

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.01

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.11

0.40 (0.24)

Min

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.02

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.38

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.12

0.24 (0.68)

Mean

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.27

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.37

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.33

0.45 (0.11)

Reaction time

FLX

Max

0.31

0.50*

0.30

0.27 (0.58)

Min

0.62*

0.44*

0.46*

0.47 (0.06)

Mean

0.32

0.52*

0.25

0.21 (0.78)

VLG

Max

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.13

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.15

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.23

0.41 (0.20)

Min

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.35

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.34

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.26

0.18 (0.89)

Mean

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.29

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.31

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.26

0.44 (0.13)

TIBIAL ROT

Max

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.20

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.36

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.09

0.24 (0.70)

Min

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.40

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.47

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.42

0.43 (0.15)

Mean

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.12

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.03

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.29

0.25 (0.65)

  1. Table shows Spearmanā€™s Rho correlation coefficients. Significant associations are marked bold and with an asterisk. All kinematic data are expressed as [Ā°]. ACLRā€‰=ā€‰anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, CONā€‰=ā€‰control, FLXā€‰=ā€‰Flexion, VLGā€‰=ā€‰Valgus, ROTā€‰=ā€‰Rotation, maxā€‰=ā€‰maximum, minā€‰=ā€‰minimum