Skip to main content

TableĀ 2 Group comparisons of landing kinematics (Mannā€“Whitney-U test)

From: Knee Biomechanics During Neurocognitively Challenged Drop Landings in Male Elite Soccer Players with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Variable

Group

Median

IQR

Test statistic (U)

p-value

Effect size (Ī“)

Max flexion [Ā°]

CON

56.70

53.10ā€“61.10

93.00

0.43

0.17

ACLR

60.90

54.90ā€“65.00

Min flexion [Ā°]

CON

55.20

53.00ā€“58.00

59.00

0.02*

0.47

ACLR

50.00

47.20ā€“53.90

Mean flexion [Ā°]

CON

53.10

50.10ā€“59.10

91.00

0.38

0.19

ACLR

56.80

53.60ā€“61.80

Max valgus [Ā°]

CON

7.43

6.58ā€“8.50

112.00

1.00

0.00

ACLR

7.52

5.64ā€“8.86

Min valgus [Ā°]

CON

5.91

4.41ā€“7.88

109.00

0.92

0.03

ACLR

5.48

4.50ā€“7.05

Mean valgus [Ā°]

CON

7.11

5.76ā€“7.52

111.00

0.96

0.01

ACLR

6.67

5.71ā€“7.70

Max tibial rotation [Ā°]

CON

4.97

4.67ā€“5.69

102.00

0.68

0.09

ACLR

5.02

3.98ā€“5.62

Min tibial rotation [Ā°]

CON

2.56

2.43ā€“2.93

104.00

0.74

0.07

ACLR

2.59

2.24ā€“2.72

Mean tibial rotation [Ā°]

CON

3.75

3.53ā€“4.50

107.00

0.83

0.04

ACLR

3.78

3.42ā€“3.88

  1. All kinematic data were calculated during initial contact. ACLRā€‰=ā€‰Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, CONā€‰=ā€‰control, IQRā€‰=ā€‰interquartile range, maxā€‰=ā€‰maximum, minā€‰=ā€‰minimum. Ī“ā€‰=ā€‰Cliffā€™s delta,* significant difference