Skip to main content
Sports Medicine - Open

Table 3 Results of the quality check using a modified checklist based on the STROBE statement

From: Multidimensional and Longitudinal Approaches in Talent Identification and Development in Racket Sports: A Systematic Review

Author(s) (year)

Abstract/Title

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Total

Total

Methodological quality

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5a,b

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12

#13

#14

#15

#16

Score

%

Abdullahi et al. (2017) [37]

1

1

1

1

(1,0) 0

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

1

0

10

63

Moderate

Baiget et al. (2014) [29]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

0

1

NA

1

1

1

1

13

87

High

Baiget et al. (2016) [30]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

13

81

High

Banzer et al. (2008) [44]

1

1

1

1

(0,0) 0

1

1

NA

1

0

0

NA

0

1

1

0

9

64

Moderate

Brechbuhl et al. (2018) [31]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

14

88

High

Catalán-Eslava et al. (2018) [40]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

13

81

High

Chapelle et al. (2022) [58]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

0

NA

1

1

1

0

12

80

High

Chen et al. (2022) [34]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

0

0

NA

1

1

1

1

12

80

High

Doherty et al. (2018) [55]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

14

93

High

Faber et al. (2016) [53]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

15

100

High

Faber et al. (2017) [54]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

NA

1

1

1

1

15

100

High

Filipcic et al. (2015) [35]

1

1

1

1

(0,1) 0

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

0

0

1

0

10

63

Moderate

Gale-Watts and Nevill (2016) [46]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

NA

1

0

1

NA

1

1

1

0

12

86

High

James et al. (2022) [38]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

0

NA

1

1

1

0

12

80

High

Kanehisa et al. (2006) [47]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

1

1

0

0

NA

1

1

1

1

13

87

High

Kolman et al. (2021) [57]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

1

1

1

0

NA

1

1

1

1

14

93

High

Kramer et al. (2016) [50]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

NA

1

1

0

NA

1

1

1

0

12

86

High

Kramer et al. (2016) [48]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

0

NA

1

1

1

1

13

87

High

Kramer et al. (2017) [49]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

1

1

1

0

NA

1

1

1

0

13

87

High

Kramer et al. (2021) [51]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

1

NA

1

1

1

0

13

87

High

Kurtz et al. (2019) [32]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

0

NA

1

1

1

0

12

80

High

Madsen et al. (2018) [52]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

1

1

0

0

NA

1

0

1

0

11

73

Moderate

Martinent et al. (2018) [45]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

15

94

High

Robertson et al. (2022) [43]

1

1

1

0

(1,1) 1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

14

88

High

Sánchez-Muñoz et al. (2020) [39]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

14

88

High

Sánchez-Pay et al. (2021) [41]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

1

NA

1

1

1

0

13

87

High

Siener and Hohmann (2019) [56]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

NA

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

14

93

High

Siener et al. (2021) [59]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

14

88

High

Söğüt (2017) [33]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

12

75

Moderate

Ulbricht et al. (2016) [42]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

0

12

75

Moderate

Zhao et al. (2020) [60]

1

1

1

1

(1,1) 1

1

1

1

1

0

0

NA

1

1

1

1

13

87

High

Ziemann et al. (2011) [36]

1

1

1

0

(1,1) 1

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

9

56

Low

  1. (1) Informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found including the study’s design; (2) scientific background and rationale for the investigation is reported; (3) statement of clear, specific objectives and/or any pre-specified hypotheses is provided; (4) information on setting, locations, and relevant dates for data collection are provided. This must include information on sport, level of competition, data collection dates, and context to be scored as a ‘1’; (5a) characteristics of study participants (must include: age, sex, skill level, overall number) are provided; (5b) procedure of selecting athletes (e.g., eligibility criteria) and how participants were categorized for study purposes (e.g., expert and novice) is described; (6) clear definition of all outcome variables, sources of data and detailed description of assessment/measurement methods are provided; (7) clear description of all statistical methods, including those used to control for confounding, is provided; (8) how missing or incomplete data were handled is explained; (9) Main findings and results (e.g., percentage of participants being separated into their performance level correctly; participants whose performance was predicted correctly; percentage (e.g., variance) explained or predicted by the measured outcome variables) are reported; (10) statistical estimate(s) and precision values (e.g., 95% confidence interval) are provided for each group. A measure of effect size is provided (e.g., Cramer's V, phi coefficient, Cohen’s w); (11) sources of potential bias are taken into account; (12) post hoc comparisons between groups (e.g., expert vs novice) are provided when appropriate (i.e., overall test is significant); (13) a summary of key results with reference to study objectives is provided; (14) discussion of the study’s limitations is provided; (15) a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives and relevant evidence is provided; (16) discussion of the study results’ generalizability to similar or other contexts is provided. Numbers for the total are presented as rounded numbers
Back to article page