Study | Participant characteristics | Intervention | Outcome measures | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | N (male) | Age | Type | Duration | Balance and gait performance | Neural adaptation | |
Studies examining the effects of balance training on spinal excitability in healthy young individuals | |||||||
Giboin [63] | HY-BT | 18(8) | 27 ± 8 | BT: unipedal stance on floor and tilt board | 1 day | Time in balance during unipedal stance on tiltboard, hands akimbo | SOL H-reflex amplitude normalized to Mmax at rest, bipedal stance on floor/board |
Freyler [27] | HY-BT 1 HY-BT 2 | 16(8) 16(7) | 24 ± 2 24 ± 2 | BT partially unloaded balance exercises BT 2: mix of balance exercises | 35 min, 2/wk, 4wks | CoP displacement in AP and ML direction during uni/bipedal stance on stable and unstable surfaces, hands akimbo | SOL H-reflex amplitude during stable surface uni/bipedal and unipedal unstable surface stance |
Keller [65] | HY-BT HY-CON | 12(6) 12(6) | 24 ± 1 | BT: Slackline standing and walking, increasing difficulty CON: no intervention | 90 min, 2–3/wk, 4wks | Sway path during bipedal EO stabilization of Posturomed following perturbation and slackline standing | SOL H/M-ratios during bipedal quiet stance and unipedal stance on cushion, Posturomed and slackline |
Giboin [68] | HY-BT Y-CON | 22(12) 2(8) | 25 ± 4 22 ± 2 | BT: Slackline standing and walking CON: no intervention | 45 min, 2/wk, 6wks | Number of steps on slackline and time in balance during unipedal stance on tiltboard, hands akimbo | SOL H-reflex amplitude normalized to Mmax assessed stepping onto slackline/ tiltboard |
Schubert [31] | HY- BT HY-ST HY-CON | 14(8) 12(7) 11(7) | 26 ± 3 27 ± 6 28 ± 5 | BT: Unipedal stance on different devices ST: Plantar extensions and dorsal flexions ankle joint CON: no intervention | 45–55 min, 4/wk, 4wks | Ground reaction forces directed to compensate backwards perturbation | SOL Hmax/Mmax during dynamic plantar flexion/ perturbation and quiet standing |
Gruber [28] | HY-BT HY-ST HY-CON | 11(7) 9(4) 9(5) | 25 ± 3 26 ± 5 26 ± 3 | BT: unipedal EO stance on different devices ST: explosive ankle strength training CON: no intervention | 60 min, 4/wk, 4wks | Sway path during unipedal stance on Posturomed, hands akimbo | SOL Hmax/Mmax during seated rest |
Taube [29] | HY-BT HY-CON | 13(8) 10(4) | 25 ± 3 27 ± 5 | BT: unipedal stance on different devices CON: no intervention | 60 min, 4/wk, 4wks | Ground reaction forces directed to compensate perturbation, sway path on platform | SOL Hmax/Mmax during short and long latency response to backwards perturbation |
Beck [30] | HY-BT HY-ST HY-CON | 9(6) 8(4) 10(7) | 28 ± 2 28 ± 2 26 ± 1 | BT: unipedal stance on different devices ST: ballistic ankle strength training CON: no intervention | 60 min, 4/wk, 4wks | Sway path during unipedal EO stance on Posturomed, hands akimbo | SOL and TA Hmax/Mmax during plantarflexion, backward perturbation, and rest |
Behrens [64] | HY-BT HY-CON | 13(7) 13(7) | 25 ± 3 23 ± 2 | BT: uni- and bipedal stance on different devices, increasing difficulty CON: no intervention | 60 min, 2/wk, 8wks | CoP sway in AP and ML direction during bipedal stance EO on rigid and foam surface, hands akimbo | SOL Hmax/Mmax at rest and during MVC |
Studies examining the effects of balance training on spinal excitability in healthy older individuals | |||||||
Alizadehsaravi [16] | HO-BT | 22(11) | 73 ± 4 | BT: Mix of unipedal exercises | 1 × 30-min and 10 × 45-min, 3wks | Balance robustness: mean time in balance on a balance platform, CoM velocity in ML direction | H-reflex and paired-pulse depression |
Penzer [67] | HO-ST HO-BT HO-CON | 10(2) 8(2) 8(2) | 71 ± 6 71 ± 6 70 ± 6 | ST: leg strength exercises BT: uni- and bipedal EO and EC stance on different devices CON: no intervention | 60 min, 2/wk, 6wks | CoP velocity during bipedal EO/EC standing on unstable surface | SOL Hmax/Mmax and Hslope during rigid EO bipedal standing |
Ruffieux [66] | HO-BT HO-CON | 15(7) 13(8) | 70 ± 4 71 ± 5 | BT: unipedal stance on different devices CON: no intervention | 3/wk, 5wks | CoP sway and # of errors in uni/bipedal stance on stable surface and unstable platform | SOL Hmax/Mmax during quiet stance |
Lauber [69] | HO-BT HO-CON | 13(7) 10(5) | 67 ± 2 68 ± 4 | SKI: alpine skiing CON: no intervention | 28.5 days over 12wks | Postural sway while bipedal EO standing and while standing on a spinning top | SOL Hmax/Mmax during stable and unstable bipedal stance |
Chen [70] | HO-BT HO-CON | 20(11) 14(6) | 73 ± 4 73 ± 7 | BT: Tai Chi@CON: no intervention | 60 min, 3/wk, 12wks | CoP displacement during bipedal EO and EC stance on a stable and unstable surface | SOL Hmax/Mmax during bipedal EO and EC stance on a stable and unstable surface |
Studies examining the effects of balance training on corticospinal excitability in healthy young individuals | |||||||
Bakker [39] | HY-BT HY-CT HY-CON | 12(6) 12(6) 12(6) | 21 ± 1 21 ± 2 22 ± 3 | BT: bipedal stance wobble board CT: stationary cycling CON: no intervention | 1 × 20 min | Time in balance on wobble board, ST and DT beam walking on wide and narrow beam, and CoP velocity during bipedal EO/EC stance on rigid and foam surface in wide and narrow stance | TMS: MEP, SICI, LICI, ICF in TA during sitting and standing |
Mouthon [73] | HY-BT HY-CON | 13(9) 13(9) | 24 ± 3 | BT: Bipedal stance on movable platform CON: no intervention | 45 min, 3/wk, 2wks | Time in balance on stable, semi-stable and unstable device, bipedal EO stance | TMS: MEP and SICI in TA and SOL during bipedal EO stance on stable, semi-stable and unstable device |
Taube [71] | HY-ST HY-BT | 24(14) | 23 ± 2 | ST: explosive strength training BT: unipedal stance on different devices, increasing difficulty | 60 min, 3/wk, 4wks | Sway path during unipedal quiet stance and recovery following AP perturbations | TMS: SICI in SOL and TA during plantar/dorsiflexion, balance perturbations or at rest |
Lauber [72] | HY-BT-ST HY-ST-BT | 12(5) 12(5) | 23 ± 2 | ST: leg strength exercises BT: unipedal EO stance on different devices, increasing difficulty | 3/wk, 4wks | Platform sway during unipedal stance on Posturomed when standing still and post perturbation | TMS: MEP and SICI in SOL during dynamic plantarflexions, balance perturbations and rest |
Schubert [31] | HY- BT HY-ST HY-CON | 14(8) 12(7) 11(7) | 26 ± 3 27 ± 6 28 ± 5 | BT: Unipedal stance on different devices ST: Plantar extensions and dorsal flexions ankle joint CON: no intervention | 45–55 min, 4/wk, 4wks | Ground reaction forces directed to compensate backwards perturbation | Conditioned SOL H-reflex during dynamic plantar flexion/ backwards perturbation and quiet standing |
Taube [29] | HY-BT HY-CON | 13(8) 10(4) | 25 ± 3 27 ± 5 | BT: unipedal stance on different devices CON: no intervention | 60 min, 4/wk, 4wks | ground reaction forces directed to compensate perturbation, sway path on platform | TMS: MEP and conditioned H-reflex in SOL during short and long latency response to backwards perturbation |
Beck [30] | HY-BT HY-ST HY-CON | 9(6) 8(4) 10(7) | 28 ± 2 28 ± 2 26 ± 1 | BT: unipedal stance on different devices ST: ballistic ankle strength training CON: no intervention | 60 min, 4/wk, 4wks | Sway path during unipedal EO stance on Posturomed, hands akimbo | TMS: During plantarflexion, backward perturbation, and rest: MEP, SICI and ICF in SOL and TA |
Studies examining the effects of balance training on corticospinal excitability in healthy older individuals | |||||||
Penzer [67] | HOA-ST HOA-BT HO-CON | 10(2) 8(2) 8(2) | 71 ± 6 71 ± 6 70 ± 6 | ST: leg strength exercises BT: uni- and bipedal EO and EC stance on different devices CON: no intervention | 60 min, 2/wk, 6wks | CoP velocity during bipedal EO/EC standing on unstable surface | TMS: MEP and MEP slope in SOL during rigid EO bipedal standing |
Ruffieux [66] | HO-BT HO-CON | 15(7) 13(8) | 70 ± 4 71 ± 5 | BT: unipedal stance on different devices CON: no intervention | 3/wk, 5wks | CoP sway and # of errors in uni/bipedal stance on stable surface and unstable platform | TMS: SOL conditioned H-reflex during anterior posterior perturbation |
Esculier [32] | HO-BT PD-BT | 8(5) 8(5) | 62 ± 12 64 ± 12 | BT: Wii-fit with balance and squat exercises | 40 min, 3/wk, 6wks | Unipedal EO stance time, CoP RMS velocity and dynamic balance tasks | TMS: MEP in QF and SOL during AO, imagery, and imitation |
Studies examining the effects of balance training on cortical activity in healthy young individuals | |||||||
Peterson [75] | HY VR1 HY-VR2 HY-BT | 10(5) 10(5) 10(5) | 23 ± 5 | Heel to toe beam walking, visual conditions: (1) VR + pert., (2) VR no pert., (3) unaltered view | 1 × 30 min | # of beam walking errors | EEG: whole brain theta, alpha, beta and gamma power during beam walking |
Zandvoort [74] | HY-BT | 15(11) | 24.7 ± 3.1 | Unipedal stance on unstable boards, increasing difficulty | 1 × 30 min | Time to recovery following a platform perturbation, allowed to use arms | EEG: Cortical source localization, cortico synergy connectivity following a perturbation |
Ueta [56] | HY-BT-AT HY-AT-BT | 14 14 | 22 ± 1 | BT: slackline training AT: stationary cycling | 1 × 30 min + after 4 weeks 1 × 30 min | Slackline standing and walking, unipedal EC standing on floor and balance disk, star excursion test | fMRI at rest: functional connectivity |
Patel [76] | HY-BT | 10 | 27 ± 4 | BT: Treadmill-Slip perturbation training | 3 days | # of compensatory steps and COM stability following treadmill perturbation | fMRI: activity during motor imagery of slipping and walking tasks |
Taubert [33] | HY-BT HY-CON | 28(14) | 26 ± 3 | BT: bipedal standing on unstable device | 45 min, 1/wk, 6wks | Time in balance on unstable device, bipedal EO stance | fMRI at rest: functional connectivity |
Giboin [68] | HY-BT HY-CON | 22(12) 22(8) | 25 ± 4 22 ± 2 | BT: Slackline standing and walking | 45 min, 2/wk, 6wks | Number of steps on slackline and time in balance during unipedal stance on tiltboard, hands akimbo | fMRI at rest: functional connectivity |
Studies examining the effects of balance training on cortical activity in healthy older individuals | |||||||
Ruffieux [40] | HO-BT HO-CON | 15(7) 12(7) | 70 ± 4 72 ± 5 | BT: One leg BT on unstable devices CON: no training | 60 min, 3/wk, 5wks | # of errors in unipedal stance on stable and unstable platform | fMRI: activity during motor imagery and action observation + motor imagery |
Magon [35] | HO-BT HO-CON | 14(8) 14(8) | 62 ± 5 62 ± 5 | BT: slackline standing and walking, increasing difficulty CON: educational fall prevention sessions | 30 min, 3/wk, 6wks | Slackline stance time in unipedal and tandem EO stance | fMRI at rest: functional connectivity |
Adcock [59] | HO-BT | 19(9) | 71 ± 6 | Exergame based on Tai Chi and dance | 40 min, 3/wk, 7wks | Gait speed in single and dual-task walking, balance score extended SPPB | EEG: Cortical activity during resting state, ROI: parieto-occipital |
Eggenberger [36] | HO-BT HO-DT | 14(5) 19(7) | 78 ± 7 73 ± 6 | BT: uni/bipedal stance on different devices DT: interactive video game-based dancing | 30 min, 3/wk, 8wks | Balance score extended SPPB | fNIRS: cortical activity during walking at preferred and fast speed, ROI: PFC |
Kubica [34] | HO-BT1 HO-BT2 HO-CON | 28(13) 15(9) 23(14) | 66 ± 1 65 ± 1 64 ± 1 | BT: mix of balance exercises BT: Wii Fit Balance board CON: no intervention | 30/60 min, 3/wk, 12wks | POMA | fMRI: during motor imagery and/or action observation |
Chen [77] | HO-BT HO-CON | 12 15 | 68 ± 1 70 ± 1 | BT: Tai Chi CON: health lectures | 60 min, 4/w, 16wks | Gait speed (m/s) during negotiating obstacle task with and without an added cognitive task | fNIRS: cortical activity during negotiating obstacle task, ROI: PFC |
Studies examining the effects of balance training on structural brain adaptations in healthy young individuals | |||||||
Ueta [56] | HY-BT-AT HY-AT-BT | 14 14 | 22 ± 1 | BT: slackline training AT: stationary cycling | 1 × 30 min + after 4 weeks 1 × 30 min | Slackline standing and walking, unipedal EC standing on floor and balance disk, star excursion test | MRI: gray matter volume and WM microstructure |
Taubert [22] | Exp. 1: HY-BT HY-CON1 Exp 2: HY-BT Exp 3: HY-CON2 | 21(10) 16(8) 11(4) 11(5) | 26 ± 4 26 ± 4 26 ± 3 28 ± 3 | BT: bipedal standing on unstable device CON1: seated rest CON2: motor action control task: repetitive high knees | Exp. 1: 1 × 45 min Exp 2: BT: 1 day, 3 × 20 min Exp 3: 1 × 45 min | Time in balance on unstable device, bipedal EO stance | MRI: cortical thickness and gray matter density |
Taubert [37] | HYA-BT HY-CON | 28(14) | 26 ± 3 | BT: bipedal standing on unstable device | 45 min, 1/wk, 6wks | Time in balance on unstable device, bipedal EO stance | MRI: gray matter volume and structural connectivity: fractional anisotropy in white matter regions |
Im [57] | HA-BT | 17(11) | 47 ± 13 | BT: home based mix of bipedal and uni/bipedal stance on different devices | 30 min, 3/wk, 4wks | BBS and Community Balance and Mobilty Scale | MRI: whole brain fractional anisotropy |
Rogge [78] | HA-BT HA-CON | 19 (7) 18 (7) | 44 ± 15 46 ± 15 | BT: uni- and bipedal EO and EC stance on different devices, increasing difficulty CON: relaxation training | 50 min, 2/wk, 12wks | Time in balance during bipedal EO stance on unstable platform, hands akimbo | MRI: cortical thickness and gray matter volume, ROI: hippocampus and basal ganglia |
Studies examining the effects of balance training on structural brain adaptations in healthy older individuals | |||||||
Sehm [17] | PD-BT HO-BT | 20(11) 16(9) | 65 ± 2 63 ± 2 | BT: bipedal stance unstable platform |  ~ 45 min, 1/wk, 6wks | Time in balance on unstable platform | MRI: whole brain gray matter volume |
Burciu [60] | CD-BT H-BT | 19(13) 19(11) | 56 ± 12 54 ± 13 | BT: move COG to target during bipedal stance on stable and unstable platform, increasing difficulty | 30/60 min, 7/wk, 2wks | Gait speed, postural sway, COG displacement velocity during bipedal EO and EC on a stable and unstable platform, BBS and TUG | MRI: whole brain gray matter volume |
Magon [35] | HO-BT HO-CON | 14(8) 14(8) | 62 ± 5 62 ± 5 | BT: slackline standing and walking, increasing difficulty CON: educational fall prevention sessions | 30 min, 3/wk, 6wks | Slackline stance time in unipedal and tandem EO stance | MRI: brain volume |
Adcock [58] | HO-BT HO-CON | 15(5) 16(10) | 77 ± 6 71 ± 5 | BT: Exergame based on Tai Chi and dance CON: no intervention | 30-40 min, 3/wk, 16-18wks | Gait speed in single and dual-task walking | MRI: brain volume, ROI: hippocampus, frontal lobe, and cerebellum |
Nagamatsu [61] | HO-AT HO-BT | 54(14) 47(29) | 67 ± 6 65 ± 6 | AT: walking BT: balance and toning exercises | 40 min, 1/wk, 52wks | TUG | MRI: brain volume, ROI: basal ganglia |
Nieman [79] | HO-AT HO-BT HO-CON | 17(5) 19(6) 13(6) | 68 ± 3 70 ± 5 69 ± 3 | AT: nordic walking BT: mix of balance exercises CON: stretching and relaxing | 45–60 min, 3/wk, 52wks | Unipedal stance time EO | MRI: brain volume, ROI: hippocampus |
Studies examining the effects of balance training on neurochemical blood markers of neural adaptation in healthy young individuals | |||||||
N.A | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Studies examining the effects of balance training on neurochemical blood markers of neural adaptation in healthy older individuals | |||||||
Solianik [80] | HO-BT HO-CON | 15(13) 15(13) | 60–78 | BT: Tai Chi CON: no intervention | 60 min, 2/wk, 10wks | CoP velocity during bipedal stance with EO and EC during ST and DT | BDNF |
Cekanauskaite [81] | HO-BT HO-CON | 18(1) 15(2) | 67 ± 6 | BT: Yoga CON: no intervention | 90 min, 2/wk, 10wks | CoP velocity during bipedal and tandem stance with EO and EC during ST and DT | BDNF |
Kubica [34] | HO-BT 1 HO-BT 2 HO-CON | 28(13) 15(9) 23(14) | 66 ± 1 65 ± 1 64 ± 1 | BT: mix of balance exercises BT: Wii Fit Balance board CON: no intervention | 30/60 min, 3/wk, 12wks | POMA | BDNF |
Szymura [62] | HO. BT PD. BT HO.CON PD.CON | 16 (11) 13(8) 16(10) 16(10) | 66 ± 3 65 ± 7 67 ± 7 66 ± 4 | BT: Uni- and bipedal stance on different devices CON: no intervention | 30–60 min, 3/wk, 12wks | POMA | BDNF |