Skip to main content

Table 6 Muscular strength reported in male, adolescent rugby league players according to age group, playing level, and playing position

From: What Tests are Used to Assess the Physical Qualities of Male, Adolescent Rugby League Players? A Systematic Review of Testing Protocols and Reported Data Across Adolescent Age Groups

Study

Playing level

Position

Sample size (n)

Age (years)

Bench press 1RM (kg)

Back squat 1RM (kg)

Prone row 1RM (kg)

Methods

Attempts

Rest (min)

Equipment

14 years of age

          

Alonso-Aubin et al. [84]

Amateur

All

46

14.5 ± 1.3

46.98 ± 13.59

104.26 ± 30.84

–

NR

NR

Smith machine

15 years of age

Fernandes et al. [86]

Academy

All

16

15.4 ± 0.5

82.2 ± 12.6

–

–

NR

3

NR

Baker et al. [105]

Academy

All

13

15.5 ± 0.5

85.0 ± 10.4

–

–

NR

NR

BB

Till et al. [61]

Academy

All

35

15.7 ± 0.2

74.8 ± 12.5

101.8 ± 18.8

72.2 ± 9.7

3

3

BB

Till et al. [96]

Academy

All

31, 30, 31f

NRb

73.9 ± 13.2

100.4 ± 21.9

70.9 ± 10.1

3

3

BB

  

Forwards

16

NRb

76.8 ± 10.9

105.2 ± 17.3

72.6 ± 8.5

   
  

Backs

15

NRb

70.9 ± 15.0

94.9 ± 25.7

68.9 ± 11.6

   

16 years of age

Baker et al. [105]

Academy

All

11

16.2 ± 1.2

70.0 ± 7.4

–

–

  

BB

Till et al. [61]

Academy

All

44

16.7 ± 0.2

93.9 ± 13.4

123.6 ± 17.1

84.0 ± 10.6

3

3

BB

Till et al. [96]

Academy

All

48

NRc

93.3 ± 13.4

122.2 ± 18.7

83.5 ± 10.2

   
  

Forwards

28

NRc

96.0 ± 13.6

124.9 ± 18.8

86.3 ± 9.3

3

3

BB

  

Backs

19

NRc

89.3 ± 12.6

118.1 ± 18.8

79.4 ± 10.5

   

Till et al. [103]

Academy

All

37

NRc

92.1 ± 13.1

119.1 ± 19.5

81.8 ± 9.9

3

3

BB

 

Elite

All

13

NRc

96.6 ± 14.4

131.0 ± 14.0

88.3 ± 10.3

   

17 years of age

Fernandes et al. [86]

Academy

All

23

17.1 ± 1.0

111.5 ± 14.3

–

–

NR

3

NR

Baker et al. [105]

Academy

All

15

17.1 ± 0.6

98.2 ± 13.5

–

–

NR

NR

BB

Till et al. [97]

Academy

All

61

17.3 ± 0.7

93.7 ± 16.7

115.7 ± 16.7

82.3 ± 11.7

3

3

BB

Till et al. [61]

Academy

All

34

17.7 ± 0.3

110.3 ± 15.9

138.2 ± 16.3

93.9 ± 11.0

3

3

BB

Till et al. [96]

Academy

All

55

NRd

103.7 ± 15.3

134.0 ± 15.5

91.1 ± 10.1

3

3

BB

  

Forwards

31

NRd

107.5 ± 15.3

136.9 ± 14.2

94.3 ± 8.6

   
  

Backs

24

NRd

98.5 ± 13.8

129.6 ± 16.8

86.8 ± 10.4

   

Till et al. [103]

Academy

All

41

NRd

100.8 ± 14.2

131.6 ± 14.2

89.6 ± 9.2

3

3

BB

 

Elite

All

19

NRd

111.9 ± 15.7

139.6 ± 17.2

94.2 ± 11.1

   

Till et al. [59]

Academy

All

64

NRd

92.6 ± 17.3

118.4 ± 23.8

82.0 ± 11.4

3

3

BB

18 years of age

Till et al. [61]

Academy

All

16

18.7 ± 0.2

110.0 ± 15.3

134.0 ± 19.5

94.3 ± 11.8

3

3

BB

Kirkpatrick et al. [13]

Elite

Forwards

12

18.8 ± 1.1

101.7 ± 9.1

132.71 ± 9.4

 

3–5

2–4

BB

  

Backs

12

18.7 ± 0.8

110.0 ± 15.8

140.21 ± 26.2

    

Till et al. [96]

Academy

All

48

NRe

113.3 ± 16.4

138.4 ± 19.6

97.6 ± 2.4

3

3

BB

  

Forwards

27

NRe

115.6 ± 16.3

143.7 ± 17.9

101.2 ± 11.4

   
  

Backs

21

NRe

110.0 ± 16.3

132.1 ± 20.2

93.0 ± 12.4

   

Till et al. [103]

Academy

All

30

NRe

111.8 ± 15.4

135.7 ± 18.1

94.3 ± 11.5

3

3

BB

 

Elite

All

19

NRe

115.6 ± 18.0

143.9 ± 20.1

102.8 ± 12.2

   
  1. 1RM one-repetition maximum, NR not reported, – not tested, All players combined across all positions, BB Barbell
  2. aTotal sample size (all positions combined) was reported rather than independently for each position
  3. bAge provided categorically as under 15 years instead of being reported as mean ± standard deviation
  4. cAge provided categorically as under 16 years instead of being reported as mean ± standard deviation
  5. dAge provided categorically as under 17 years instead of being reported as mean ± standard deviation
  6. eAge provided categorically as under 18 years instead of being reported as mean ± standard deviation
  7. fSample size for each test varied so data are reported separately for Bench press 1RM (n = 31), Back squat 1RM (n = 30), Prone row 1RM (n = 31), 40-m (n = 178) in order