Skip to main content

Table 2 Responses to statements in the general perceptions of deloading dimension

From: Integrating Deloading into Strength and Physique Sports Training Programmes: An International Delphi Consensus Approach

General perceptions of deloading

Round 2 (n = 29)

Round 3 (n = 21)

Agreement (%)

Disagreement (%)

Agreement (%)

Disagreement (%)

Deloading training typology

Deloading could be a reduction in overall training demand

100.0

0.0

100.0

0.0

Deloading could be a reduction in training intensity

96.6

3.4

100.0

0.0

Deloading could be a reduction in training volume

96.6

3.4

100.0

0.0

Deloading could be a reduction in training frequency

89.7

10.3

100.0

0.0

Deloading could be a reduction in proximity to failure

100.0

0.0

100.0

0.0

Deloading could be a way of mitigating physical fatigue in the training cycle

100.0

0.0

100.0

0.0

Deloading could be a way of mitigating psychological fatigue in the training cycle

100.0

0.0

100.0

0.0

Deloading could be a period of recovery

100.0

0.0

100.0

0.0

Deloading could be a period of adaptation

78.6

21.4

85.0

15.0

Taper or Deload?

Deloading is a form of tapering

51.9

48.1

55.0

44.0

Deloading is different from tapering, as tapering decreases training volume but maintains training intensity whereas deloading does not

57.1

42.9

50.0

50.0

Tapering occurs before competition whereas deloading can occur anywhere in the training programme

92.9

7.1

95.2

4.8

Tapering is designed to achieve peaking whereas deloading is designed to promote recovery

88.9

11.1

89.5

10.5

Current education on deloading training

Deloading is sufficiently represented in strength and conditioning textbooks

8.0

92.0

11.1

88.9

Deloading is sufficiently represented in strength and conditioning qualifications

13.6

86.4

0.0

100

Current approaches to deloading are primarily based on coach experiential knowledge of deloading

96.3

3.7

100

0.0

There are limited scientific studies and understanding about deloading

100.0

0.0

100.0

0.0

Scientific studies on deloading would inform my approach to deloading

96.6

3.4

100.0

0.0

Scientific studies on deloading should be open access

100.0

0.0

100.0

0.0

Networking would provide opportunities for coaches to learn more about deloading

96.3

3.7

100.0

0.0

Non-traditional media, like blogs, podcasts and YouTube videos could be used to disseminate knowledge of deloading

100.0

0.0

100.0

0.0