Skip to main content

Table 4 Use of programme material and how coaches accessed the digital material

From: Adherence to Injury Prevention Exercise Programmes in Amateur Adolescent and Adult Football: A Detailed Description of Programme Use from a Randomised Study

 

Extended Knee Control group (n = 20)

Adductor group (n = 17)

‘How valuable did you find the programme material and instructions?’*

Printed material, median (IQR), min–max

6.0 (1.0), 3–7

6.0 (1.5), 1–7

 Did not access written material, n (%)

2 (10.0)

0 (0.0)

Digital material (pdf)

5.0 (2.5), 2–7

6.0 (3.5), 2–7

 Did not access digital material (PDF), n (%)

7 (35.0)

8 (47.1)

Films on website

5.5 (4.3), 2–7

5.0 (3.0), 3–7

 Did not access films on website, n (%)

6 (30.0)

8 (47.1)

Practical workshop

6.0 (3.0), 2–7

7.0 (1.0), 4–7

 Did not take part in practical workshop, n (%)

5 (25.0)

1 (5.9)

Telephone contact with physiotherapist

4.0 (4.5), 1–7

4.0 (2.3), 2–7

 Did not have telephone contact, n (%)

8 (40.0)

7 (41.2)

‘If you accessed digital material, what media did you most often use?’

Mobile phone

7 (35.0)

3 (17.6)

Tablet

3 (15.0)

0 (0.0)

Computer

5 (25.0)

3 (17.6)

Did not use any digital material (pdf or films)

9 (45.0)

11 (64.7)

  1. *Values are given on a 1–7 Likert scale, where 1 represented “not valuable”, 4 “rather valuable” and 7 “most valuable”. Values are presented as the median, interquartile range, and min–max values or n (%) coaches
  2. Values represent number of coaches (%)