Skip to main content

Table 1 Selection criteria according to PICOS criteria (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, study design

From: Effects of Exercise Training on Muscle Quality in Older Individuals: A Systematic Scoping Review with Meta-Analyses

Category

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Population

Higher- or lower-functioning healthy older individuals age ≥ 65 years or individuals with neurological conditions (e.g., Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke)

We determined the age criterion by averaging the age of participants across the training and control groups in each study and compared it against the age limit of 65 years. For lower-functioning older individuals, we used walking speed (< 1.0 m/s), short physical battery performance score (≤ 8.0) and author-reported diagnosis of sarcopenia

Higher- or lower-functioning healthy older individuals age < 65 years or individuals with neurological conditions (e.g., Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke)

Intervention

Resistance training, aerobic training, multimodal training, and other single-mode exercise interventions (e.g., aquatic, dance exercise) with or without dietary supplements

Studies that were shorter than six weeks in duration or used fewer than nine exercise sessions

Comparator

Active (i.e., contrast with different training programs) and passive, placebo control or wait-list control groups

No control group

Outcome

MMQ outcomes included intermuscular and intramuscular adipose and fibrous tissue, i.e., the amount of non-contractile tissue expressed in absolute terms and relative to total muscle size determined by imaging (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], peripheral quantitative computed tomography [pQCT], computed tomography [CT], or ultrasound imaging [US]). NMQ outcomes were the ratio of maximal isometric or dynamic voluntary force, torque, or the load lifted relative to muscle size, i.e., muscle thickness, muscle mass, muscle volume or muscle cross-sectional area determined by MRI, pQCT, CT, US and also by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We included both upper and lower extremity muscles

Failed to report the pre-post means or change scores and their standard deviations numerically or graphically; studies for which authors did not reply to our inquiries sent by email; failed to use at least one marker of MMQ or NMQ

Study design

Randomized controlled trials including upper extremity and dietary supplement data

Case report, used a cross-over design or a diet-only intervention

  1. MMQ, NMQ: morphological and neuromuscular muscle quality