Effects of Greater Central Arterial Stiffness on Cardiovagal Baroreflex Sensitivity in Resistance-Trained Men

Background Compared with age-matched untrained men, resistance-trained men who have undergone long duration training (> 2 years) at a high frequency (> 5 days/week) may be lower cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) because of central arterial stiffening. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of greater central arterial stiffness in resistance-trained men on cardiovagal BRS in a cross-sectional study to compare resistance-trained men with age-matched untrained men. Methods This cross-sectional study included resistance-trained men (n = 20; age: 22 ± 3; body mass index: 26.7 ± 2.2) and age-matched untrained men (control group: n = 20; age: 25 ± 2; body mass index: 23.7 ± 2.4). The β-stiffness index and arterial compliance were assessed at the right carotid artery using a combination of a brightness mode ultrasonography system for the carotid artery diameter and applanation tonometry for the carotid blood pressure. And, the cardiovagal BRS was estimated by the slope of the R–R interval and systolic blood pressure during Phase II and IV of Valsalva maneuver (VM). The participants maintained an expiratory mouth pressure of 40 mmHg for 15 s in the supine position. Results The β-Stiffness index was significantly higher in the resistance-trained group than in the control group (5.9 ± 1.4 vs. 4.4 ± 1.0 a.u., P < 0.01). In contrast, the resistance-trained group had significantly lower arterial compliance (0.15 ± 0.05 vs. 0.20 ± 0.04 mm2/mmHg, P < 0.01) and cardiovagal BRS during Phase IV of VM (9.0 ± 2.5 vs. 12.9 ± 5.4 ms/mmHg, P < 0.01) than the control group and. Moreover, cardiovagal BRS during Phase IV of VM was inversely and positively correlated with the β-stiffness index (r = − 0.59, P < 0.01) and arterial compliance (r = 0.64, P < 0.01), respectively. Conclusion Resistance-trained group had greater central arterial stiffness and lower cardiovagal BRS Phase IV compared with control group. Moreover, the central arterial stiffening was related to cardiovagal BRS Phase IV. These results suggest that greater central arterial stiffness in resistance-trained men may be associated with lower cardiovagal BRS. Trial Registration University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) in Japan, UMIN000038116. Registered on September 27, 2019.

is positively associated with central arterial stiffness. • Greater central arterial stiffness in resistance-trained men may be associated with lower cardiovagal BRS. • Although the prescription of appropriate RT is highly recommended, this study raises caution regarding central arterial stiffening with RT.

Background
The arterial baroreflex greatly contributes to beat-tobeat control of arterial blood pressure (ABP) through the autonomic nervous system. The cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is blunted by aging [1][2][3][4]. Blunted cardiovagal BRS is a risk factor for life-threatening arrhythmias and is a predictor of sudden cardiac death [5,6]. The cardiovagal BRS is correlated with age-related changes in central arterial mechanical properties such as stiffness and compliance where the baroreceptors are located (the carotid artery and the aortic arch) [2,3,7], because the arterial baroreceptors primarily sense the deformation of the arterial wall rather than intraarterial pressure changes [8]. Knutsen et al. [9] have suggested that the arterial diameter experiences less distension in a stiffer artery. Thus, to maintain appropriate cardiovagal baroreflex function, it is important to maintain lower central arterial stiffness.
Recently, statements on physical activity have recommended resistance training (RT) for muscular hypertrophy and maximizing strength [10,11]. Several studies have reported that RT increases and decreases central arterial stiffness and compliance in healthy individuals, respectively [12][13][14][15]. On the other hand, García-Mateo et al. [16] have reported that RT, of at least four weeks duration and two days per week frequency, does not alter central arterial stiffness and compliance in systematic review. However, many studies have demonstrated that resistance-trained men who have performed for long duration training (> 2 years) at high-frequency (> 5 days/ week), such as bodybuilders, throwers and weight-lifters, almost certainly have higher central arterial stiffness and lower arterial compliance than age-matched untrained men [17][18][19][20][21]. The central arterial stiffening in resistancetrained men may be associated with lower cardiovagal BRS.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of greater central arterial stiffness in resistance-trained men on cardiovagal BRS. Because resistance-trained men almost certainly have higher central arterial stiffness and lower arterial compliance than age-matched untrained men [17][18][19][20][21], a cross-sectional study comparing between the trained and untrained was appropriate to investigate the purpose of this study. Therefore, we designed a cross-sectional study in which central arterial stiffness, compliance, and cardiovagal BRS were compared between resistance-trained and age-matched untrained men. We hypothesized that greater central arterial stiffness in resistance-trained men would be associated with lower cardiovagal BRS. Although this phenomenon has not been considered a problem because the effect of central artery adaptation with RT on cardiovascular diseases has not been clarified yet, this study may provide evidence about the potential risk of central arterial stiffening with RT.

Participants
Forty healthy men (resistance-trained group; n = 20 and control group; n = 20) were recruited to participate in this study. The participants in the resistance-trained group had been performing RT for > 2 years, > 5 days/ week. Moreover, participants in the resistancetrained group performed RT and used free weights and machines. Furthermore, these participants were in a training period for muscle hypertrophy in this study. None of the participants in the control group regularly engaged in RT and performed other exercise training < 3 days/week. All of the participants were normotensive (< 130/80 mmHg), had no history of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, smoking, and were not taking medications such as anabolic steroids.
All of the participants provided written informed consent to participate prior to the start of the study. All of the procedures and risks of this study were reviewed and approved by the Human Research Committee of Waseda University (approval No. 2019-102). The study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Protocol
The studies were performed following a 3-h fast. The participants were required to avoid and caffeine intake for at least 12 h and alcohol intake for at least 24 h before participating in the study. The participants were also evaluated 24 h after their last exercise session to avoid the acute effects of exercise.
All participants underwent measurement of hemodynamic and carotid arterial variables, and cardiovagal BRS in a temperature-and humidity-controlled environment (Temperature: 22.0 ± 0.1 °C, Humidity: 50.0 ± 0.3%) after 15 min in a resting supine position. All measurements were carried out under comfortable laboratory conditions between 09:00 AM and 1:00 PM.

Body Composition
Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody 720, InBody Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with the participant in the upright position.

Muscular Strength
Handgrip strength was measured using a grip dynamometer (Grip-D, Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) as an index of muscular strength with the participant in the standing position. The participants were instructed to stand and extend their dominant hand by their sides during a hand grip execution and to grip the dynamometer with full effort for three seconds. The values (kg) were calculated as the average of two trials.

Central Arterial Stiffness and Compliance
The β-stiffness index and arterial compliance of the carotid artery were measured as an index of central arterial stiffness and compliance, respectively. Both the β-stiffness index and arterial compliance were measured in the right carotid artery using a combination of a brightness mode ultrasonography system for the carotid artery diameter and applanation tonometry for the carotid blood pressure (BP). The carotid artery diameter was obtained 1.0-2.0 cm proximal to the carotid bifurcation using an ultrasonography system equipped with a 10-MHz linear transducer (LOGIQ-e, GE Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). The diameter was recorded over ten cardiac cycles with the brightness mode in the longitudinal section. The images obtained were analyzed using image analysis software (ImageJ, NIH, USA), and these images were used to analyze the systolic diameter (sD) and diastolic diameter (dD).
The carotid pressure waveform was obtained in the right carotid artery. The obtained pressure waveforms were converted from a pencil-type probe incorporating a highfidelity strain-gauge transducer (SPT-301, Millar Instruments, TX, USA) at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz through an analog/digital converter (PowerLab/16SP, AD Instruments, New South Wales, Australia) and recorded in a device connected to a personal computer (MacBook, Apple, CA, USA). Then, the obtained data were analyzed using an analysis software (LabChart5, AD Instruments, New South Wales, Australia). The carotid arterial pressure was calibrated by equating the carotid diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) to the brachial artery value [22]. The β-stiffness index and arterial compliance were calculated as follows [12,13,18,19]:

Carotid Arterial Intima-Media Thickness
The carotid arterial intima-media thickness (CA IMT) was measured 1.0-2.0 cm proximal to the carotid bifurcation with an ultrasonography system equipped with a 10-MHz linear transducer (LOGIQ-e, GE Medical Systems, Tokyo Japan). The obtained images were analyzed using image analysis software (ImageJ, NIH, USA). At least ten CA IMT measurements were taken, and the mean value was used for analysis [12,13,18,19].

Hemodynamics
HR and beat-to-beat ABP were acquired using a threelead ECG (BSM-2401, NIHON KOHDEN, Japan) and finger photoplethysmography (Finapres Medical Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), respectively. The photoplethysmograph was attached to the middle finger of the right hand. Additionally, stroke volume (SV) was calculated from the obtained ABP waveform using the Modelflow method [23,24], which incorporates age, height and weight, and simulates aortic flow waveforms from an arterial pressure signal using a nonlinear three-element model of the aortic input impedance (Beatscope, version 1.1, Finapres Medical Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were then calculated as SV × HR and MAP / CO, respectively.

Cardiovagal Baroreflex Sensitivity
The Valsalva maneuver (VM) is separated by four phases as described by Hamilton et al. [25]: (Phase I) onset of strain with an increase in ABP and a decrease in HR, (Phase II) continued strain with a decrease in ABP and its later partial recovery, (Phase III) strain release with a sudden decrease in ABP and further heart acceleration, and (Phase IV) system recovery with ABP overshoot. Cardiovagal BRS was evaluated using the slope of the R-R interval and systolic BP (SBP) during Phase II (Cardiovagal Phase II) and IV (Cardiovagal Phase IV) of the VM [2-4, 26, 27]. Figure 1 shows the typical responses of SBP (a) and R-R interval (b) during the VM.
VM was carried out to maintain an expiratory mouth pressure of 40 mmHg for 15 s by blowing through a short tube connected pressure gauge after deep inspiration in supine position. The pressure values were displayed to provide visual feedback to the participants. Immediately after, participants were instructed to maintain normal respiration and to avoid deep respiration. The waveform of the beat-to-beat R-R interval and SBP was digitally converted at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz through an analog/digital converter, recorded in a device connected to a personal computer, and analyzed with analysis software (LabChart 5, AD Instruments, New South Wales, Australia). Cardiovagal Phase II was estimated from what constitutes the first decrease in BP, from strain onset to strain termination. On the other hand, Cardiovagal Phase IV was evaluated from where the R-R interval began to lengthen and continued to the point of maximal SBP elevation. Then, the slope of linear correlation between the R-R interval and the SBP was assessed for both BRSs, which was determined if the r value was > 0.8, as previously described (Fig. 1c) [28]. Both BRSs were calculated using spreadsheet software (Microsoft Excel, Microsoft, WA, USA) immediately after each VM trials. The VM was performed until three acceptable values (r > 0.8) were obtained. As a result, all participants performed 5-10 VM trials at 3-to 5-min intervals. The average of the three values was taken as the definitive measurement.

Data and Statistical Analysis
The cardiovagal BRS was not completely blindly analyzed because the index was calculated immediately after each VM trial to check whether acceptable values (r > 0.8) were obtained. However, all ultrasonography system data were randomly selected by a third person who was not involved in this study, and the selected data were then analyzed by authors who were unaware of which study participant the data belonged to.
All values were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using statistical analysis software (SPSS version 26.0 for Mac, IBM, Tokyo, Japan). The Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to determine the normality of data parameters. The mean differences in the two groups were examined using the Student's unpaired t test. To investigate the effects of central arterial stiffening in resistance-trained men on cardiovagal BRS, Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship between cardiovagal BRS and β-stiffness index, and between cardiovagal BRS and arterial compliance. In all of the analyses, the level of significance for all comparisons was set at P < 0.05. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the participants. Body weight, body mass index, lean body mass, and hand grip strength were significantly higher in the resistancetrained group than in the control group (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the other characteristics of the participants between the two groups. The training frequency of the resistance-trained group and the control group was 5 ± 1 and 2 ± 1 days/ week, respectively. Moreover, the overall training duration in the resistance-trained group was 3.8 ± 1.6 years. Table 2 shows hemodynamics and carotid arterial variables. The brachial DBP was significantly lower in the resistance-trained group (P < 0.05). Brachial and carotid pulse pressure (PP) were significantly higher in the resistance-trained group than in the control group (both, P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in other hemodynamic and carotid arterial variables between the two groups at rest.

Central Arterial Stiffness and Compliance, Cardiovagal Baroreflex Sensitivity
The β-Stiffness index was significantly higher in the resistance-trained group than in the control group (P < 0.01, Fig. 2a). By contrast, the resistance-trained group demonstrated significantly lower arterial compliance and cardiovagal BRS than the control group (P < 0.01, Fig. 2b and c, respectively).

Relationship Between Cardiovagal Baroreflex Sensitivity and Central Arterial Mechanical Properties
The associations between cardiovagal BRS and β-stiffness index, and between cardiovagal BRS and arterial compliance are shown in Fig. 3a and b, respectively. A negative correlation was found between cardiovagal BRS and the β-stiffness index (r = -0.59, P < 0.01), and a positive correlation was found between cardiovagal BRS and arterial compliance (r = 0.64, P < 0.01).

Discussion
The present study showed that the resistance-trained group demonstrated a higher β-stiffness index (Fig. 3a), lower arterial compliance (Fig. 3b), and lower cardiovagal BRS (Fig. 3c) compared with the control group. In addition, cardiovagal BRS Phase IV was inversely and positively correlated with the β-stiffness index and arterial compliance, respectively (Fig. 2a, b). These findings suggest that greater central arterial stiffness in resistancetrained men may be associated with lower cardiovagal BRS.

Characteristics of the Participants and Hemodynamics
Body weight, body mass index, lean body mass, and hand grip strength were significantly higher in the resistancetrained group than in the control group ( Table 1). The results also considered the findings of previous studies that compared resistance-trained men with untrained men. However, the handgrip scores in the RT group were certainly not high. Most of the participants in the RT group had participated in a competition (i.e., bodybuilding competition, weight-or power-lifting) and achieved excellent grades. Therefore, the participants in the resistance-trained group were thought to be well-trained.  Moreover, given that the RT group had a higher body weight, we did not examine RT-induced systematic hemodynamic differences (e.g., larger SV/CO). We speculate that the average high value was caused by outliers, i.e., three participants in the control group were retired endurance athletes from over 4 years ago. Although these participants did not habitually perform exercise at the time of the study, the values of SV and CO were still high.
The CO value was significantly different when these participants were excluded from the analysis.
Otsuki et al. [21] have suggested that higher central arterial stiffness and lower arterial compliance in RT athletes are associated with a higher plasma endothelin-1 (ET-1) concentration than in the age-matched untrained individuals and endurance athletes. ET-1 is produced by vascular endothelial cells and is a strong vasoconstrictor [35]. A study has reported that pulse wave velocity, as an index of central arterial stiffness, is increased by the intraarterial infusion of ET-1 [36]. These findings suggest that ET-1 may contribute to the central arterial stiffening in resistance-trained men.
Elevation of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) causes vasoconstriction [37], resulting in increasing arterial stiffness [32]. MSNA and central arterial stiffness are higher in resistance-trained individuals than in endurance-trained individuals, and MSNA is positively correlated with central arterial stiffness [32]. Moreover, norepinephrine (NE) concentration in the blood and central arterial stiffness are increased with upper limb RT, but not with lower limb RT according to Okamoto et al. [14]. The study has also shown a positive correlation between the changes in NE concentration in the blood and central arterial stiffness. These results indicate that changes in sympathetic nerve activity are associated with central arterial stiffness following RT [14,32].
Pressor response during acute resistance exercise may also be associated with the elevation of central arterial stiffness and reduction of arterial compliance. RT may alter the arterial load-bearing properties and thereby cause arterial stiffening, because acute resistance exercise dramatically elevates BP as high as 320/250 mmHg in resistance-trained individuals [38]. Ozaki et al. [15] have demonstrated that carotid arterial compliance is decreased in the high-intensity RT group, and the changes are correlated with SBP elevations during acute exercise sessions.
However, it is unclear whether the effects of these factors on higher central arterial stiffness and lower arterial compliance (Fig. 3a, b) were found in the present study. Also, evidence is limited regarding the mechanisms underlying the central arterial stiffening in resistancetrained men. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate the precise mechanism of increased central arterial stiffness with high-frequency RT for long duration.
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials focused low-to high-intensity has demonstrated that RT improves vascular endothelial function [39], which seems to be at odds with increases in arterial stiffness and/or reduced arterial compliance. On the other hand, a meta-analysis focused only high-intensity RT demonstrated that the RT is associated with an increase in arterial stiffness in young participants [40]. Considering this context, training intensity is important factor whether increases in central arterial stiffness with RT. In addition, García-Mateo et al. [16] suggested that RT frequency and duration were associated with increases in central arterial stiffness in a systematic review. Otsuki et al. [21] demonstrated that resistance-trained men who perform high-intensity RT at high-frequency (5.1 ± 0.1 days/week) for long duration (> 2 years) have greater central arterial stiffness and plasma ET-1 levels, although the plasma nitrite/nitrate levels remain the same. A previous study showed that intraarterial infusion of exogenous ET-1 in young, apparently healthy individuals caused a significant attenuation of vascular endothelial function [41]. Thus, resistance-trained men may have impaired vascular endothelial function due to an elevation plasma ET-1 levels. On the other hand, it remains unclear whether the frequency and duration of high-intensity RT influence vascular endothelial function.
Although the resistance-trained group had a higher central arterial stiffness and lower central arterial compliance compared with the control group, no significant difference was observed in TPR (Table 2). Beck et al. [42] have demonstrated that high-intensity RT (approximately 70-80% 1RM) for 8 weeks reduces peripheral arterial stiffness. Considering the previous finding, we speculate that the reduction of peripheral arterial stiffness with high-intensity RT is a compensatory adaptation to prevent the elevation of TPR. However, it is unclear whether resistance-trained men who participated in the present study have lower peripheral arterial stiffness because we did not measure peripheral arterial stiffness.

Relationship Between Cardiovagal Baroreflex Sensitivity and Central Arterial Mechanical Properties
The present study found a negative correlation between cardiovagal BRS and β-stiffness index, and a positive correlation between cardiovagal BRS and arterial compliance (Fig. 2a, b). These findings may support previous studies, which report that cardiovagal BRS is correlated with alteration of central arterial stiffness and compliance [2,3,7]. A previous animal study has found that lowintensity resistance training improves cardiovagal BRS [43]. Okamoto et al. [44] have reported that low-intensity resistance training decreases arterial stiffness. In other words, the different result with previous study may be influenced by training intensity. Intervention studies have also reported that high-intensity RT either decreases or did not change cardiovagal BRS in humans [45,46]. These results may contradict with the partly same or completely different results of the present study. However, it is difficult to compare these results with our result because of the differences in the methods used to evaluate cardiovagal BRS. Although the present study used VM to evaluate cardiovagal BRS, previous studies utilized a more spontaneous methodology. Yang et al. [47] have demonstrated that spontaneous cardiovagal BRS was not correlated to the cardiovagal BRS of the VM. The authors also discussed that assessing cardiovagal BRS under different physiological conditions might be influenced by the different aspects of cardiovagal baroreflex function, which are likely due to the static (spontaneous) versus rapidly changing (VM) conditions. We noted that the spontaneous cardiovagal BRS was not significantly different between the groups. This result may support the finding of a previous study, suggesting that cardiovagal BRS is different when assessed with the VM [47]. However, the spontaneous cardiovagal BRS, which was estimated for 3 min at rest, was inadequate in the present study because previous studies have described that the index is obtained with the R-R interval and SBP for more than 10 min at rest [47]. Therefore, further studies are required to clarify the effect of central arterial stiffening with RT on cardiovagal BRS in both methodologies.
Arterial baroreceptors such as the aortic arch and carotid sinus constantly monitor ABP and the information is fed back to the medulla oblongata through the baroreceptive afferents nerve [47]. The ABP is then modified by an alteration of CO and peripheral vascular resistance via the autonomic nervous system [48]. The arterial baroreflex is associated with central arterial mechanical properties such as stiffness and compliance [2,3,7], because the arterial baroreceptors primarily sense the deformation of the arterial wall [49]. A previous study has also found that alteration of the arterial diameter is related to neural firing rather than ABP [8]. Based on these results, deformation of the arterial wall may be inhibited by stiffer artery in resistance-trained men compared with age-matched untrained men.
The cardiovagal BRS is determined not only by the central arterial mechanical properties but also by the neural component [50]. In an animal study, exercise training has been confirmed to attenuate sympathoexcitation through alterations in the GABAergic neurotransmission at the level of the nucleus tractus solitarius [50]. The neural transmission in the brain might have affected the cardiovagal BRS, which was assessed during Phase IV of VM similar to the present study. Even so, the present study did not assess the neural component. Therefore, further studies should be conducted to investigate the arterial baroreceptor-related neural component in resistancetrained men.
Cardiovagal BRS Phase II (Table 2) or IV (Fig. 3c) in the resistance-trained group was higher compared with those with diseases such as coronary artery disease [51], autonomic failure [52] and Parkinson's disease [53]. However, the lower cardiovagal BRS in the resistance-trained group than in the control group should not be taken lightly. In contrast, considering the number of functional and physiological benefits with RT, RT should not be discouraged. Kawano et al. [12] demonstrated that combined moderate-intensity aerobic and high-intensity RT increases muscular strength and does not induce central arterial stiffening. Therefore, this strategy may prevent the reduction in cardiovagal BRS while keeping the benefits of RT.

Study Limitation
There are several potential limitations in the present study. First, we recruited only men in both groups. A previous study has shown that high-intensity RT increases central arterial stiffness in women [54]. However, the female sex hormone estrogen also influences central arterial stiffness [55]. Therefore, because of the relative difficulty in separating female sex hormone contribution from the effect of RT on central arterial stiffening, women were not included in present study. Second, the participants in the present study were all young. Several studies have shown that central arterial mechanical properties and cardiovagal BRS are impaired by advancing age [2,3,7]. The interaction between age and RT on cardiovagal BRS should be examined in future studies. Finally, the present study was designed as a cross-sectional study that compared resistance-trained men and untrained men. Although habitual physical and untrained activity patterns also influence cardiovagal BRS [56,57], these were not measured nor controlled in the present study. Therefore, this study's findings should be confirmed with an intervention study.

Conclusions
β-Stiffness index was significantly higher in the resistance-trained group than in the control group (Fig. 3a). By contrast, the arterial compliance and cardiovagal BRS in the resistance-trained group were significantly lower than those in the control group (Fig. 3b and c). Moreover, a negative correlation was found between cardiovagal BRS and β-stiffness index (Fig. 2a). Considering these results, greater central arterial stiffness in resistance-trained men may be associated with lower cardiovagal BRS. In light of the functional and physiological benefits with RT, the properly prescribed RT should still be highly recommended. The present study only raises caution when heavy and strenuous RT is to be prescribed.