Skip to main content

Table 2 QUIPS risk of bias assessment for included studies

From: Intrinsic Risk Factors for Ankle Sprain Differ Between Male and Female Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Study

Potential risk of bias item

Risk of bias

1

2

3

4

5

6

Attenborough et al. 2017 [39]

+

+

+

−

−

+

High

Beynnon et al. 2001 [40]

+

+

+

+

−

+

Low

DeRidder et al. 2016 [41]

+

+

+

+

+

+

Low

Engebretsen et al. 2010 [42]

+

+

+

+

+

+

Low

Fousekis et al. 2012 [43]

+

+

+

+

+

+

Low

Gribble et al. 2016 [21]

+

+

+

+

+

+

Low

Hartley et al. 2018 [20]

+

+

+

+

+

+

Low

Kawaguchi et al. 2021 [44]

+

+

+

+

+

+

Low

Kofotolis et al. 2007 [18]

+

−

+

+

+

+

Low

Kofotolis et al. 2007 [45]

+

−

+

+

+

+

Low

McCann et al. 2018 [46]

+

+

+

+

−

+

Low

Powers et al. 2017 [19]

+

−

+

+

+

+

Low

Saki et al. 2021 [16]

+

−

+

−

+

+

High

Tyler et al. 2006 [17]

−

+

+

−

−

+

High

Willems et al. 2005 [47]

+

+

+

−

−

+

High

Willems et al. 2005 [48]

+

+

+

−

−

+

High

  1. QUIPS Quality in Prognosis Studies. 1: study participation, 2: study attrition, 3: prognostic factor measurement, 4: outcome measurement, 5: study confounding variables, 6: statistical analysis and reporting