Table 2 (a) Cut-off values and number of positive scores for the selected parameters; POMSfatigue (score), HRmax (bpm), glucoseend and lactateend (mmol L−1) and Borg RPEmean (scale 6–20) during HIIT. (b) A summary of subjects having n of 5 scores during each phase of training load. During MAL, all 11 subjects achieved more 3 or more scores, whereas non had 3 or more scores in BL, LT, MT1 and RE
From: A Simple Model for Diagnosis of Maladaptations to Exercise Training
a Number of subjects achieving a positive score for each parameter | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diagnostic parameter | Mean normal | Mean MAL | Mean diff | Cut-off value | BL | LT | MT1 | MT2 | MAL | RE |
POMSfatigue | 42.6 | 51.9 | + 9.3 | + 4.7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 1 |
HRmax | 183.6 | 178.5 | − 5.1 | − 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 2 |
Glucoseend | 6.11 | 4.68 | − 1.43 | − 0.71 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 0 |
Lactateend | 13.28 | 12.03 | − 1.25 | − 0.62 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 1 |
RPEmean | 17.5 | 18.5 | + 1.0 | + 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 9 |
b Number of subjects achieving n of 5 scores in all phases | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | BL | LT | MT1 | MT2 | MAL | RE |
≥ 1 of 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 9 |
≥ 2 of 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 11 | 4 |
≥ 3 of 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 0 |
≥ 4 of 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 0 |
5 of 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 |