Skip to main content

Table 4 Subgroup analyses regarding effects of heavy resistance training on running economy

From: Heavy Resistance Training Versus Plyometric Training for Improving Running Economy and Running Time Trial Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Moderator variables

Hedges’ g [95% CIs LL, UL]

Interpretation

Performance level

Lv. 1 (Recreational level)

 − 0.27[ − 0.59, 0.04]

Small

Lv. 2 (Moderate level)

 − 0.18 [ − 0.92, 0.56]

Trivial

Lv. 3 (High level)

 − 0.61 [ − 1.84, 0.63]

Moderate

Age

Young (21.0–31.5 years)

 − 0.51 [ − 0.83, 0.19]

Moderate

Old (34.1–44.8 years)

 − 0.12 [ − 0.41, 0.17]

Trivial

Training intensity

 < 90% 1RM or > 4RM

 − 0.17 [ − 1.05, 0.70]

Trivial

 ≥ 90% 1RM or ≤ 4 RM

 − 0.31 [ − 0.61,  − 0.02]

Small

Training modality

Dynamic training

 − 0.32 [ − 0.64, 0.00]

Small

Isometric training

 − 0.33 [ − 0.89, 0.22]

Small

Intervention period

Short (6–8 weeks)

 − 0.21 [ − 0.56, 0.15]

Small

Long (10–14 weeks)

 − 0.45 [ − 0.83,  − 0.08]

Small

  1. Data are standardized mean difference for effect size values (Hedges’ g)
  2. Hedges’ g represents time (pre vs. post) by group (experimental vs. control) interaction
  3. CIs: confidence intervals, LL: lower limit, UL: upper limit