Skip to main content

Table 1 Assessment of the study quality and the risk of bias

From: Heavy Resistance Training Versus Plyometric Training for Improving Running Economy and Running Time Trial Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Study

Quality assessment

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias

Oxford Evidence levels

PEDro

CONSORT

Selection bias

Detection bias

Attrition bias

Other bias

Random sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of outcome assessment

Incomplete outcome data

Selective reporting

Albract and Arampatzis [63]

5

15

High risk

Unclear

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Bohm et al. [64]

5

16

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

2b

Damasceno et al. [65]

6

23

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Ferrauti et al. [66]

6

17

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

1b

Festa et al. [67]

5

18

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

High risk

High risk

2b

Karsten et al. [68]

6

18

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Johnston et al. [69]

6

19

Low risk

Unclear

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Piacentini et al. [70]

4

24

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

2b

Vikmoen et al. [71, 72]

4

18

Unclear

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear

2b

Fletcher et al. [73]

6

15

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Millet et al. [74]

6

13

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Storen et al. [75]

6

19

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Garcia-Pinillos et al. [76]

6

22

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

1b

Machado et al. [77]

6

14

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

Unclear

High risk

2b

Pellegrino et al. [78]

6

19

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

1b

Ache-Dias et al. [79]

5

23

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Berryman et al. [80]

5

18

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

2b

do Carmo et al. [81]

5

21

Unclear

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Spurrs et al. [82]

6

19

High risk

Unclear

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Turner et al. [83]

6

18

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

2b

Ramirez-Champillo et al. [84]

6

17

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

1b

Mean \(\pm\) SD

5.5 ± 0.7

18.4 ± 2.9

      
  1. The assessments of PEDro, CONSORT, the risk of bias, and the Oxford Evidence level were graded based on their corresponding checklists
  2. In addition, the mean scores were calculated for PEDro and CONSORT
  3. CONSORT: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; PEDro: Physiotherapy Evidence Database