Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological quality of the included studies using the PEDro rating scale

From: Effects of Plyometric Jump Training on Measures of Physical Fitness and Sport-Specific Performance of Water Sports Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Scorea

Study quality

Amaro et al. [121]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Aurell-Badenas et al. [122]

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

5

Moderate

Bellver et al. [123]

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

4

Moderate

Bishop et al. [124]

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

5

Moderate

Bonacci et al. [125]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Born et al. [126]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Breed and Young [127]

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

5

Moderate

Cañas-Jamett et al. [128]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Cossor et al. [66]

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

4

Moderate

Egan-Shuttler et al. [129]

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

5

Moderate

Egan-Shuttler et al. [130]

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

5

Moderate

Garrido et al. [131]

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

5

Moderate

Jones et al. [132]

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

4

Moderate

Kramer et al. [133]

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

5

Moderate

Martin et al. [134]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Oranchuk et al. [135]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Potdevin et al. [136]

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

5

Moderate

Pupišová et al. [137]

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

4

Moderate

Ramos-Veliz et al. [138]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Rebutini et al. [139]

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

5

Moderate

Saez de Villarreal et al. [113]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Saez de Villarreal et al. [112]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Sammoud et al. [141]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Sammoud et al. [140]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Veliz et al. [142]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

Vlachopoulos et al. [56]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

High

  1. A detailed explanation for each PEDro scale item can be accessed at https://www.pedro.org.au/english/downloads/pedro-scale. In brief: item 1, eligibility criteria were specified; item 2, participants were randomly allocated to groups; item 3, allocation was concealed; item 4, the groups were similar at baseline; item 5, there was blinding of all participants regarding the plyometric jump training programme being applied; item 6, there was blinding of all coaches responsible for the application of plyometric jump training programme regarding its aim towards the improvement of physical fitness/sport-specific performance; item 7, there was blinding of all assessors involved in measurement of physical fitness/sport-specific performance attributes; item 8, measures of at least one key outcome variable were obtained from more than 85% of participants initially allocated to groups; item 9, all participants for whom outcome variables were available received the treatment or control condition as allocated or, data for at least one key outcome variable were analysed by “intention to treat”; item 10, the results of between-group statistical comparisons were reported for at least one key outcome variable; and item 11, point measures and measures of variability for at least one key outcome variable were provided
  2. aFrom a possible maximal score of 10