Skip to main content

Table 1 Study quality assessment—Joanna Briggs Institute

From: Acute Neuromuscular, Physiological and Performance Responses After Strength Training in Runners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Studies

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

%

Blagrove et al. 2019 [20]

U

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

62.5

Burt et al. 2012 [15]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Burt et al. 2013 [16]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Burt et al. 2014 [17]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

De Sousa et al. 2011 [32]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Doma et al. 2013 [25]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Doma et al. 2013 [26]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Doma et al. 2014 [27]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Doma et al. 2015 [28]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Doma et al. 2017 [29]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Doma et al. 2019 [30]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Drummond et al. 2005 [22]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Guimarães et al. 2020 [31]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Low et al. 2019 [19]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Marcello et al. 2017 [21]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Marcora et al. 2007 [18]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Palmer et al. 2001 [33]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Taipale et al. 2014 [23]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

Taipale et al. 2015 [24]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75

  1. Y—YES, N—No, U—Not clear. Q1: Were the inclusion criteria well defined? Q2: Have participants and context been described in detail? Q3: Were the measurements collected in a valid and reliable way? Q4: Were standardized and objective inclusion criteria used? Q5 Were any confounding variables found? Q6: Were strategies used to deal with confounding variables? Q7: Were the results measured validly and reliably? Q8: Was the statistical analysis used adequate?