Skip to main content

Table 2 Frequency of responses and multinomial logistic regression values (with odds ratio) for predicting the footwear type and brand based on sex, while controlling for competition level

From: Do the Footwear Profiles and Foot-Related Problems Reported by Netball Players Differ Between Males and Females?

 

Total

(n = 2925)

Male

(n = 279)

Female

(n = 2646)

Odds ratio

(95% CI)

p value

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Shoe type

Netball

2278 (78.9)

83 (30.0)

2195 (84.1)

Running

354 (12.3)

50 (18.1)

304 (11.6)

4.70 (3.20–6.92)

 < 0.001**

Basketball

97 (3.4)

90 (32.5)

7 (0.3)

287.57 (125.53–658.78)

 < 0.001**

Cross-trainer

89 (3.1)

29 (10.5)

60 (2.3)

16.27 (9.48–27.92)

 < 0.001**

Tennis

34 (1.2)

17 (6.1)

17 (0.7)

17.77 (8.53–37.04)

 < 0.001**

Other

29 (1.0)

3 (1.1)

26 (1.0)

Volleyball

7 (0.2)

5 (1.8)

2 (0.1)

48.45 (8.43–278.65)

 < 0.001**

Not specified

37 (0.0)

2 (0.0)

35 (0.0)

Shoe brand

ASICS

2444 (84.0)

143 (51.8)

2301 (87.4)

Mizuno

171 (5.9)

8 (2.9)

163 (6.2)

0.67 (0.32–1.40)

0.283

Nike

160 (5.5)

87 (31.5)

73 (2.8)

21.22 (14.21–31.69)

 < 0.001**

Other

62 (2.1)

22 (8.0)

40 (1.5)

Adidas

45 (1.5)

12 (4.3)

33 (1.3)

5.86 (2.81–12.24)

 < 0.001**

Brooks

22 (0.8)

4 (1.4)

18 (0.7)

4.96 (1.51–16.30)

0.008*

Reebok

5 (0.2)

0 (0.0)

5 (0.2)

Puma

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Not specified

16 (0.0)

3 (0.0)

13 (0.0)

  1. The most frequent category of each independent variable “Netball” and “ASICS” were set as the reference category
  2. *Indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05
  3. **Indicates a significant difference at p < 0.001