Skip to main content
Sports Medicine - Open
Fig. 7 | Sports Medicine - Open

Fig. 7

From: Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Units on Lower Extremity Kinematics During Running: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fig. 7

Forest plot describing the validity of step frequency measured using IMU (Pearson correlation coefficient, r). Squares represent Fisher’s Z; bars indicate 95% confidence intervals and diamonds as pooled data. De Fontenay et al.,2020a (IMUs vs optical motion capture system, IMUs: Moov Now™), 2020b (IMUs vs optical motion capture system, IMUs: MilestonePod), 2020c (IMUs vs optical motion capture system, IMUs: RunScribe™), 2020d (IMUs vs optical motion capture system, IMUs: Zoi), 2020e (IMUs vs optical motion capture system, IMUs: TgForce) [38]; García-Pinillos et al.,2019a (IMUs vs optical motion capture system, IMUs: Stryd™), 2019b (IMUs vs optical motion capture system, IMUs: RunScribe™) [42]. SE standard error, IV inverse variance, CI confidence interval

Back to article page