Skip to main content
Sports Medicine - Open
Fig. 3 | Sports Medicine - Open

Fig. 3

From: Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Units on Lower Extremity Kinematics During Running: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fig. 3

Subgroup analysis describing the validity of stance time measured using IMU (Pearson correlation coefficient, r). Squares represent Fisher’s Z; bars indicate 95% confidence intervals and diamonds as pooled data. Day et al.,2021a (5 Hz cutoff), 2021b (10 Hz cutoff), 2021c (30 Hz cutoff) [36]; García-Pinillos et al.,2019a (IMUs vs optical motion capture system, IMUs: Stryd™), 2019b (IMUs vs optical motion capture system, IMUs: RunScribe™) [42]; Mo and Chow, 2018a (jogging, L-method), 2018b (jogging, M-method), 2018c (jogging, S-method), 2018d (jogging, MS-method), 2018e (running, L-method), 2018f (running, M-method), 2018 g (running, S-method), 2018 h (running, MS-method) [49]. SE standard error, IV inverse variance, CI confidence interval.

Back to article page