Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of included studies

From: The Effects of High-Intensity Multimodal Training in Apparently Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review

Reference

Cochrane collaboration tool domain

Random sequence generation

Deviation from intended intervention

Missing outcome data

Outcome measurement

Selective reporting

Overall ROB

HIMT versus passive or habitual activity control

Paoli et al. [44]

 − 

 − 

 + 

 − 

 − 

 × 

Meier et al. [47]

 − 

 − 

 + 

 − 

 − 

 × 

Schmidt et al. [58]

 − 

 × 

 × 

 − 

 − 

 × 

Batrakoulis et al. [18]

 + 

 × 

 × 

 − 

 − 

 × 

Romero-Arenas et al. [46]

 − 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 × 

Ajjimaporn et al. [43]

 − 

 − 

 + 

 − 

 − 

 × 

Engel et al. [41]

 − 

 − 

 + 

 × 

 − 

 × 

Batrakoulis et al. [40]

 + 

 × 

 × 

 × 

 − 

 × 

Eather et al. [25]a

 − 

 + 

 × 

 × 

 − 

 × 

Islam et al. [66]

 − 

 × 

 × 

 − 

 − 

 × 

McWeeny et al. [36]

 − 

 − 

 + 

 − 

 − 

 × 

Batrakoulis et al. [39]

 + 

 × 

 × 

 − 

 − 

 × 

HIMT versus structured activity (concurrent training)

      

Davis et al. [32]

 × 

 × 

 × 

 + 

 − 

 × 

Davis et al. [33]

 × 

 × 

 × 

 + 

 − 

 × 

Mirzaei et al. [45]

 − 

 − 

 + 

 − 

 − 

 × 

Heinrich et al. [24]

 − 

 × 

 × 

 × 

 − 

 × 

Carneiro et al. [35]

 − 

 × 

 × 

 − 

 − 

 × 

Nunes et al. [42]

 − 

 − 

 + 

 − 

 − 

 × 

Bahremand et al. [34]

 − 

 × 

 × 

 − 

 − 

 × 

Hovsepian et al. [67]

 − 

 × 

 × 

 − 

 − 

 × 

  1. HIMT, High-Intensity Multimodal Training; ROB risk of bias, + low risk of bias, × high risk of bias, − some risk of bias
  2. aIntention-to-treat analysis