Skip to main content

Table 9 A combined strength and endurance training intervention

From: Effect of Different Types of Strength Training on Swimming Performance in Competitive Swimmers: A Systematic Review

Reference

Competition level, sex. N intervention groups, age (y)

Non-specific dry-land resistance training

Week tr./ tr. per week

Resistance training program for EG and any changes in the CG habitual training

Performance measured

Other measured effects

Positive effects of training intervention

Findings in swim performance * Significant change from pre- to posttest (p < 0.05)

Aspenes et al. [9]

National

n = 20

8 M, 12 F

EG, n = 11

17.5 ± 2.9

CG, n = 9

15.9 ± 1.1

Combined strength and endurance training

11/2

EG: Strength: 5 reps × 3 latissimus pull down at 60–75% 1RM

Swimming: 4 × 4 min intervals high intensity

CG: swim only

50 m, 100 m, 400 m freestyle

Land strength, SF, VO2peak, cost of swimming, SR, SL and max. SV

 + 400 m, land strength, swimming force

50 m (s)

EG:

Pre 28.88 ± 2.00

Post 28.55 ± 1.80

CG:

Pre 29.35 ± 1.71

Post 29.16 ± 1.76

100 m (s)

EG:

Pre 63.00 ± 4.12

Post 62.05 ± 3.82

CG:

Pre 64.08 ± 4.18

Post 64.06 ± 4.80

400 m (s)

EG:

Pre 290.43 ± 16.26

Post 286.43 ± 16.64*

CG:

Pre 290.08 ± 16.20

Post 290.40 ± 18.24

  1. Participant’s characteristics, method of resistance training, duration of training intervention and sessions per week, training program, swimming performance measured, positive effects of training intervention, findings in swim performance and whether they are significant (p < 0.05). EG = experimental training group and CG is control group
  2. M = male, F = female, n = number, y = years old, fc = front crawl, 1RM = 1 repetition maximum, SF = swimming force, SR = stroke rate, SL = stroke length, SV = swimming velocity