Skip to main content

Table 8 Plyometric training interventions

From: Effect of Different Types of Strength Training on Swimming Performance in Competitive Swimmers: A Systematic Review

References

Competition level, sex. N intervention groups, age (y)

Non-specific dry-land resistance training

Week tr./ tr. per week

Resistance training program for EG and any changes in the CG habitual training

Performance measured

Other measured effects

Positive effects of training intervention

Findings in swim performance * Significant change from pre- to posttest (p < 0.05)

Potdevin et al. [46]

Regional

n = 23

10 M, 13 F

EG, n = 12

14.3 ± 0.2

CG, n = 11

14.1 ± 0.2

Plyometric training

6/2

EG: Unloaded plyometric jump training (long, lateral and depth)

Total jumps: 220 first week with linear increasing up to 498

CG: swim only

50 m, 400 m fc

CMJ, SJ, gliding test (max. speed and mean acceleration), 25 m front crawl without dive, 25 m kicking

 + CMJ, SJ, max. glide speed, 50 and 400 m front crawl. Mean acceleration during gliding for both groups

50 m (s)

EG:

Pre 40.00 ± 5.88

Post 38.76 ± 4.57*

CG:

Pre 40.98 ± 4.77

Post 40.32 ± 3.61

400 m (s)

EG:

Pre 434.78 ± 47.82

Post 416.67 ± 39.41*

CG:

Pre 454.55 ± 41.67

Post 449.44 ± 30.44*

  1. Participant’s characteristics, method of resistance training, duration of training intervention and sessions per week, training program, swimming performance measured, positive effects of training intervention, findings in swim performance and whether they are significant (p < 0.05). EG = experimental training group and CG is control group
  2. M = male, F = female, n = number, y = years old, fc = front crawl, CMJ = countermovement jump, SJ = squat jump