Skip to main content

Table 7 Maximal strength training interventions

From: Effect of Different Types of Strength Training on Swimming Performance in Competitive Swimmers: A Systematic Review

References

Competition level, sex. N intervention groups, age (y)

Non-specific dry-land resistance training

Week tr./ tr. per week

Resistance training program for EG and any changes in the CG habitual training

Performance measured

Other measured effects

Positive effects of training intervention

Findings in swim performance * Significant change from pre- to posttest (p < 0.05)

Girold et al. [12]

Regional to national

n = 14

7 M, 7 F

EG, n = 7

16.5 ± 2.5

CG, n = 7

16.5 ± 1.5

Maximal strength training

12/2

ST: 6 reps × 3, BP, pull ups, barbell draws, SQ, plyometrics

CG: 45 min aerobic cycling

50 m fc

SL, SR, SD, elbow flexor and extensor strength

 + 50 m, SD, elbow extensor strength

50 m (s)

ST:

Pre 29.59 ± 2.88

Post 28.50 ± 2.00*

CG:

Pre 31.35 ± 2.30

Post 31.15 ± 1.85

Girold et al. [51]

National

n = 16

8 M, 8 F

EG, n = 8

21.1 ± 1.4

CG, n = 8

24.2 ± 4.6

Maximal strength training

4/3

ST: 6 reps × 3 pull ups, latissimus pull down, swim-bench latissimus pull-downs 80–90% 1RM

CG: swim only

50 m fc

SL, SR, peak torque of arm extensors in isometric, arm extensors in concentric and arm extensors in eccentric

 + 50 m, SL, peak torque in concentric conditions

50 m (s)

ST:

Pre 26.84 ± 1.90

Post 26.30 ± 0.34*

CG:

Pre 28.57 ± 2.20

Post 28.43 ± 0.17

Schumann et al. [42]

National

n = 16

10 M, 6 F

EG, n = 9

14.8 ± 1.0

CG, n = 7

15.1 ± 1.1

Explosive and maximal strength training vs hypertrophic strength training

16/3

Wk 1–7: EG and CG trained 6–10 reps × 3 at 75–85% of 1RM of whole-body DLST

Wk 8–16: EG trained 3–4reps × 4 at 85–90% of 1RM (SQ, deadlifts, BP, pull-ups) and explosive DLST (throws and jumps)

CG: cont. with same training as in wk 1–7

400 m fc

1RM half-SQ and BP, CMJ, swim-start performance, RPE

 + 1RM half-SQ and BP, CMJ

400 m (s)

EG:

Pre 297 ± 17

Post 288 ± 11

CG:

Pre 298.5 ± 13.5

Post 292.5 ± 8.5

Strass [43]

Regional

n = 19

17 M, 2 F

EG, n = 10

16.6 ± 1.2

CG, n = 9

17.8 ± 3.9

Maximal strength training

6/4

EG: Arm extensor muscle training at 1–3 sets of 1–3 reps at 90–100% of 1 RM

CG: swim only

50 m fc

Isometric arm extension force, rate of force development, SR, SL

 + 50 m, 25 m, isometric arm extensor force, rate of force development, SR, SL

50 m (s)

EG:

Pre 28.25 ± 1.28

Post 27.62 ± 1.22*

CG: no change, no values reported

  1. Participant’s characteristics, method of resistance training, duration of training intervention and sessions per week, training program, swimming performance measured, positive effects of training intervention, findings in swim performance and whether they are significant (p < 0.05). EG = experimental training group and CG is control group
  2. M = male, F = female, n = number, y = years old, fc = front crawl, BP = bench press, SQ = squat, CMJ = countermovement jump, DLST = dry-land strength training, 1RM = 1 repetition maximum, SF = swimming force, SL = stroke length, SV = swimming velocity, SR = stroke rate, SD = stroke depth, RPE = ratings of perceived exertion with Borg’s scale