Author/Year | Aim | Study population | Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Business | |||
Bradley et al. (2013) [55] | Investigate whether personality compositions influence the effect of task conflict on team performance | 561 Students | Task conflict had a positive impact on performance in teams with high levels of openness or emotional stability |
Porter et al. (2010) [26] | Examine boundary conditions for the positive effects of two aspects of teamwork (backing up behaviour and performance monitoring) on team performance | 276 Undergraduate business students (69 teams) | Backing up behaviour had positive effects on team performance when combined with performance monitoring |
Engineering | |||
Shaukat et al. (2017) [59] | Offer insights regarding the consequences of relationship conflict among employees in terms of their task performance, contextual performance and turnover intentions | 306 Telecom engineers | Relationship conflict is negatively related to task performance, contextual performance and turnover intentions |
Sport | |||
You (2020) [62] | Analyse the difference in cultural functions between high- and low-performance university soccer teams | 316 Korean University Soccer Players | Higher performing teams were good at adapting to changes in their environment, and had coherent and aligned goals |
Verma et al. (2012) [60] | Assess the role of different parameters of team cohesiveness (Group-Task and Group-Social) among the high and low performing teams | 208 Male elite volleyball players | Group cohesion parameters were significantly higher among high-performance volleyball players in comparison with low-performance players |
Warner et al. (2012) [61] | Employs social network analysis as a tool to explore a case study of the structural cohesiveness of two women’s collegiate basketball teams | 47 Team members | High performing teams showed improved structural cohesion in the efficacy network and highlighted the movement of key players in the different networks (friendship, trust, advice, and efficacy) over time |
Health and social care | |||
Jehn et al. (2015) [57] | Examine the effects of asymmetric perceptions of task conflict on the anticipated relationship with the partner, as well as subjective and objective performance | 84 University students (25 men and 59 women) | When individuals realise that they have asymmetric task conflict perceptions, they have lower expectations about having a positive relationship with their partner and perform worse |
Education | |||
Reimer (2001) [58] | Explore the effect of performance attributions on group achievement | 80 Senior High school students | In situations in which a conflict arises among group members group, performance is determined by the individual’s problem-solving strategies and also by the extent to which group members consider their partners’ perspective |
Multiple sectors | |||
Bachrach et al. (2006) [53] | Examine whether task interdependence moderates the relationship between the helping form of organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) and group performance | 62 Teams | The relationship between helping and group performance depends on the level of task interdependence required of group members |
Jackson (2011) [56] | Investigate if group failure on a task was expected to adversely affect cooperative responses to a subsequent social dilemma | 48 Four-person teams | A strong group identity mitigated the adverse consequences of collective failure |
Bang and Park (2015) [54] | Examine the relationship between task conflict and team performance | 5,579 Employees (153 teams) | Task conflict positively predicted actual team performance when job demand was high, whereas it had a negative effect when job demand was low |