Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant and study features and coding

From: Convergent Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Resistance Exercise in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Type

Feature

Categories

Coding

Participant

Age of participants

Mean years

Nos.

 

Sex of participants

Male

1

  

Female

2

  

Both

3

 

Resistance training level

Sedentary

1

  

 < 6 month

2

  

 > 6 month

3

  

 > 1 Year

4

  

Elite level

5

Exercise

Muscle action

Dynamic

1

  

Concentric

2

  

Eccentric

3

  

Isometric

4

 

Body segment

Upper

1

  

Lower

2

  

Whole

3

 

Protocol

Continuous

1

  

Intermittent

2

 

Workload range

(% 1RM)

Nos.

RPE Scale

Scale used

Borg 6–20

1

  

CR-10

2

  

OMNI-RES

3

  

ERF

4

  

Borg words

5

  

IES

6

  

NRS

7

  

PTD

8

  

RES + RIR

9

 

Number of points

–

Nos.

 

Fixed maximum

Yes

1

  

No

2

 

Rating mode

Estimation

1

  

Production

2

 

Rating type

Active muscle

1

  

Overall

2

  

Sessional

3

Study

Outcome measure

EI

1

  

HR

3

  

EMG

3

  

BLa

4

 

EI variable manipulated

Workload

1

  

No. reps

2

  

Rep time

3

  

Rest time

4

  1. Coding, nominal coding used to allow analysis as a categorical variable. ERF, estimated repetitions to failure [28], Borg words, Borg CR-10 verbal cues with no numerical cues [29]. IES, Isometric Exercise Scale [30,31,32], NRS, Numerical Rating Scale [11, 18], PTD, perceived task duration [33], RES + RIR, resistance exercise specific RPE with repetitions in reserve [19]