Table 1 Methodological quality score for each study
From: Screening Tools as a Predictor of Injury in Gymnastics: Systematic Literature Review
Study | Designa [1] | Level of evidenceb [5] | Selection criteriac [1] | Settingd [1] | Demographic informatione [1] | Description of screening toolf [2] | Injury definitiong [1] | Injury diagnosish [1] | Statistical analysisi [1] | Predictive statistical analysisj [1] | Reliability of index testk [2] | Percentage missingl [1] | Outcomem [1] | Confoundersn [1] | Total Score [20] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ling et al. [1] | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 17 |
Abalo- Núñez et al. [2] | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
Linder and Caine [4] | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 |
Sweeney et al. [9] | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
Bukva et al. [21] | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 |
Miller et al. [22] | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 |
Cupisti et al. [23] | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
Toraman et al. [24] | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
DiFiori et al. [25] | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 |
Kirkby et al. [26] | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
Steele and White [27] | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
Vanti et al. [28] | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
Wright and De Crée [29] | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 |
Ghasempour et al. [30] | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 |
Ghasempour et al. [31] | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 |