Skip to main content

Table 6 Effectiveness—knee injuries (general)

From: The Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Warmups for Lower Extremity Injury Prevention in Basketball: A Systematic Review

Study

Intervention group

Control group

Point estimate

Confidence measure (95% confidence interval or p value)

Injuries

N

Injuries

N

Balance interventions

McGuine et al. [21]

Cumps et al. [19]

Emery et al. [29]

Eils et al. [28]

Riva et al. [22]

2

24

5

24

RR = 0.36

0.07–1.83

Multicomponent interventions

Hewett et al. [31]

Pfeiffer et al. [34]

LaBella et al. [20]a

7

236

9

161

RR = 0.53

0.20–1.40

Longo et al. [32]

5

80

2

41

OR = 1.21

0.358–4.11

Aerts et al. [26]

Bonato et al. [27]

2

86

12

74

χ2 test

p = 0.037*

Foss et al. [30]

35

126

36

121

ARR = 1.07

0.72–1.65

Omi et al. [33]

  1. The numerator in all injury rates (reported and computed) is the number of total injuries, not the number of persons injured
  2. “RR” is risk ratio; “OR” is odds ratio; “HR” is hazard radio; “ARR” is adjusted risk ratio; “NR” is not reported
  3. “*” = statistically significant at p = 0.05 level
  4. aLaBella et al. [20] reported non-contact knee injuries