From: Test–Retest Reliability of the One-Repetition Maximum (1RM) Strength Assessment: a Systematic Review
Study | Item 1 | Item 2 | Item 3 | Item 4 | Item 5 | Item 6 | Item 7 | Item 8 | Item 9 | Item 10 | Item 11 | Total score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amarante do Nascimento et al. [21] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Augustsson et al. [22] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Augustsson et al. [23] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Barbalho et al. [26] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 11 |
Benton et al. [24] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Benton et al. [25] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Buckley and Hass [16] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Carabello et al. [27] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Comfort and McMahon [28] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Ellis et al. [29] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Faigenbaum et al. [30] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 11 |
García-Ramos et al. [31] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Grosicki et al. [32] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Hageman et al. [33] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
LeBrasseur et al. [34] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Levinger et al. [18] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
McCurdy et al. [35] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
McCurdy et al. [36] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Neto et al. [37] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Patterson et al. [38] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Phillips et al. [39] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | 9 |
Ribeiro et al. [40] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Ribeiro et al. [41] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Rydwik et al. [42] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Salem et al. [43] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Schroeder et al. [44] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Scott et al. [45] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 10 |
Seo et al. [46] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Sugiura et al. [47] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Tagesson and Kvist [48] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Tiggemann et al. [49] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |
Urquhart et al. [50] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 9 |