Skip to main content

Table 8 Summary of included original studies investigating ‘psychological’

From: The Influence, Barriers to and Facilitators of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rehabilitation Adherence and Participation: a Scoping Review

Author (year)

Design

Population

Concepts investigated

OMs

Adherence measures

n

Age (mean)

Sex

Activity level

Brewer et al. (2003) [73]

Prospective

61

26

M 40

F 21

Competitive (57%)

Recreational (41%)

Non-athletes (3%)

Self-motivation

Athletic Identity

Social support

SMI, SSI, AIMS, BSI

Rehabilitation attendance index (attended/scheduled), SIRAS, self-reported home rehabilitation adherence (0–10 scale)

Brewer et al. (2013) [75]

Prospective

91

29.7

M 58

F 33

Competitive (57%)

Recreational (41%)

Non-athletes (3%)

Stress and mood

Athletic identity

Neuroticism

Pessimism

AIMS, NEO-FFI, PESS, LOT-R, POMS-B, Lysholm knee score, NPRS, daily stress 0-5 scale

Self-reported home rehabilitation adherence (0–10 scale)

Brewer et al. (2000) [62]

Prospective

95

26.9

M 67

F 28

Competitive (52%)

Recreational (43%)

Non-athletes (3%)

Self-motivation

Athletic Identity

Social support

SMI, SSI, AIMS, BSI, KT1000, single leg hop for distance

Rehabilitation attendance index (attended/scheduled), SIRASSelf-reported rehabilitation adherence diary (0–10 scale)

Chan et al. (2003) [74]

Retrospective

95

25.2

M 94

F 21

100% sport participation

Autonomy

Self-motivation

HCCQ, TSRQ

Combined items from the SIRAS and Modified Patient Self-Report Scales of Their Home-based Rehabilitation Adherence

Hilliard et al. (2004) [76]

Prospective

108

29.4

M 72

F 36

Not stated

Personality traits

NEO-FF

SIRAS, Rehabilitation attendance index (attended/scheduled)

Niven et al. (2012) [70]

Prospective

87

29

M 65

F 28

International (10%)

National (12%)

District (14%)

Club (45%)

Recreational (18%)

Theory of planned behaviour (self-efficacy, intention)

Attitudes towards ACL Rehabilitation Questionnaire

Self-reported rehabilitation adherence (0–7 scale)

Rock and Jones (2002) [71]

Case series

3

32

M 1

F 2

Competitive athletes

Social support

Self-motivation

Counselling

SSBS, emotion scores in ERAIQ, NPRS, perceived rehabilitation completion (0-100 scale)

SIRAS

Scherzer et al. (2001) [72]

Prospective

54

28

M 37

F 17

Competitive (52%)

Recreational (46%)

Non-athletes (2%)

Goal setting

Imagery

Positive self-talk

Sports Injury Survey subscales (goal setting, healing imagery, positive self-talk)

Rehabilitation attendance index (attended/scheduled)

Self-reported rehabilitation adherence (0-10 scale)

  1. AIMS athlete identity measurement scale, BSI brief symptom inventory, ERAIQ emotional response of athletes to injury questionnaire, HCCQ health care climate questionnaire, LOT-R the life orientation test-revised, NEO-FF neuroticism five-factor inventory, NPRS numerical pain rating scale, PESS pessimism, POMS-B negative mood–profile of mood states-B, SIRAS sports injury rehabilitation adherence scale, SMI self-motivation inventory, SSBS social support behaviours survey, SSI social support inventory, TSRQ treatment self-regulation questionnaire