Skip to main content

Table 7 Summary of included reviews investigating ‘psychological’

From: The Influence, Barriers to and Facilitators of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rehabilitation Adherence and Participation: a Scoping Review

Author (year)

Design

Dates

Methodological quality

Included

Key concepts

Anderson et al. (2016) [13]

Systematic

2004–2014

Not assessed

2

Self-confidence, optimism, self-motivation, stress, social support, athletic identity

Ardern et al. (2016) [66]

Narrative

Not specified

Not assessed

N/A

Cognitive appraisal, previous experiences, attitudes, self-efficacy, fear of reinjury

Burland et al. (2019) [67]

Narrative

Not specified

Not assessed

N/A

Self-efficacy

Christiano et al. (2015) [58]

Narrative

Not specified

Not assessed

3

Self-esteem, post-traumatic stress, pain intolerance, mood disturbance, goal setting, positive self-talk, fear of reinjury, self-efficacy, self-motivation, athletic identity

Everhart et al. (2015) [65]

Systematic

1975–2012

63/90 modified Coleman score

8

Goal setting, positive self-talk, self-motivation, self-efficacy, optimism, self-confidence, stress, social support, athletic identity

Flanagan et al. (2015) [68]

Narrative

Not specified

Not assessed

N/A

Self-efficacy, self-motivation, athletic identity, social support, fear of reinjury, confidence, optimism/pessimism, goal setting, positive self-talk

Mendonza et al. (2007) [59]

Systematic

Until 2006

Not assessed

7

Self-motivation, social support, athletic identity, goal setting, positive self-talk, situational stability, stability, personal control

Sims and Mulcahey (2018) [69]

Narrative

Not specified

Not assessed

N/A

Self-confidence, optimism, self-motivation, locus of control, athletic identity, sex difference in psychology

Spetch and Kolt (2001) [21]

Narrative

Not specified

Not assessed

N/A

Stress, self-motivation

te Wierike et al. (2013) [60]

Systematic

2001–2011

Good

2

Self-efficacy, age and sex effect on psychology, low confidence/self-esteem, social support, goal setting, positive self-talk, avoidance coping

  1. Methodological quality refers to the outcome or presence of the quality appraisal undertaken by the review not the authors of this study. The key concepts list all of the psychological concepts addressed by each review in relation to psychological variables and adherence to rehabilitation