Skip to main content

Table 4 Meta-analysis results

From: The Role of Aerobic Training Variables Progression on Glycemic Control of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Analysis and sub-analysis

Number of comparisons

Meta-analysis

Heterogeneity

Difference in means (%)

Effect size

95% CI

p value

I 2

p value

Aerobic training

24

− 0.65

− 1.037

− 1.386; − 0.688

< 0.001

76%

< 0.001

Non-progressive aerobic training

13

− 0.45

− 0.920

− 1.329; − 0.512

< 0.001

74%

< 0.001

Presence of comorbidities

6

− 0.33

− 0.554

− 1.048; − 0.061

0.028

52%

0.065

Absence of comorbidities

3

− 0.79

− 1.358

− 2.556; − 0.159

0.026

86%

< 0.001

Walking/running modalities

7

− 0.43

− 1.292

− 1.856; − 0.727

< 0.001

61%

0.018

Cycle ergometer modalities

2

− 0.156

− 0.643; 0.330

0.529

0%

0.753

Untrained participants

9

− 0.39

− 0.956

− 1.382; − 0.530

< 0.001

58%

0.013

Undefined participant’s training status

2

− 0.443

− 1.646; 0.759

0.470

84%

0.013

Progressive aerobic training

14

− 0.84

− 1.478

− 2.197; − 0.759

< 0.001

87%

< 0.001

Presence of comorbidities

4

− 0.79

− 3.061

− 4.823; − 1.299

0.001

90%

< 0.001

Absence of comorbidities

9

− 0.94

− 0.699

− 1.226; − 0.171

0.009

68%

0.001

Walking/running modalities

7

− 0.69

− 1.078

− 1.817; − 0.340

0.004

78%

< 0.001

Mixed modalities

5

− 1.12

− 2.614

− 4.206; − 1.022

0.001

92%

< 0.001

Untrained participants

11

− 0.99

− 1.808

− 2.688; − 0.927

< 0.001

89%

< 0.001

Undefined participant’s training status

3

− 0.381

− 0.905; 0.143

0.154

0%

0.633

Progressive aerobic training (intensity)

6

− 0.57

− 1.625

− 2.903; − 0.348

0.013

92%

< 0.001

Progressive aerobic training (duration)

4

− 0.93

− 2.264

− 3.603; − 0.926

< 0.001

84%

< 0.001

Progressive aerobic training (intensity and duration)

6

− 1.27

− 1.422

− 2.544; − 0.300

0.013

89%

< 0.001