Skip to main content

Table 1 Study information

From: Winning at all costs: a review of risk-taking behaviour and sporting injury from an occupational safety and health perspective

Study

Participants

Sample size

Player type

Methods

Awareness measured

Methods validity

Associations

Case-control study

 Barnard [23]

77 student athletes and 50 student non-athletes

127 Case group (athletes): 32 M 45F

Control group (non-athletes): 13 M 37F

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Mental illness

***

Athletes and non-athletes did not significantly differ in willingness to seek mental health treatment.

Discrimination to mental illness: non-athletes > athletes.

Willingness to seek psychological help: F > M.

Fedor and Gunstad [24]

382 college athletes and 230 college non-athletes

612 Case group (athletes): 228 M 154F

Control group (non-athletes): 77 M 153F

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Concussion

***

Concussion symptoms identification: athletes > non-athletes (p < 0.01)

Cohort study

 Kroshus et al. [25]

146 ice hockey players

146 M

6 teams

Elite

Questionnaire

Concussion

****

No statistically significant changes were observed in knowledge (p = 0.38), attitudes (p = 0.78) or perceived norms (p = 0.11).

Inclination to play while concussed: before education > after education (lecture education: p = 0.02; email education p = 0.02).

Cluster-randomised controlled trial

 Cusimano et al. [26]

267 minor league hockey players

267; 10-year olds competitive, 106; 10-year olds recreational, 60; 14-year olds competitive, 54; 14-year olds recreational, 47.

Elite

Questionnaire

Brain injuries

**

Concussion knowledge: before video education < immediately after video education (p < 0.01).

Concussion knowledge at 2 months: no significance between video and no-video groups (controlling for prior knowledge level, age and competitive level) (p = 0.52).

Attitudes and behaviour scores at 2 months did not differ between groups p = 0.51.

 McKay et al. [27]

31 female soccer teams, 29 coaches,258 players

Baseline: 47 coaches, 385 players

Post-season: 29 coaches, 258 players

Elite

Questionnaire

Extremity injuries

****

Postseason: players > coaches considered “inadequate warm-up” as a risk factor for injury (p < 0.01).

The belief that injuries are preventable: coaches > players answer “yes” (p = 0.00).

Grounded theory study

 Hachfeld et al. [28]

23 student-athletes

23 M

Student athletes

Focus group

Testicular cancer

***

Student athletes were more likely to perform testicular self-examination than the general student population and physical awareness is the core structural process that influenced the action.

Cross-sectional study

 Azodo et al. [29]

156 basketball players

156

124 M

32 F

Mixed

Questionnaire

Orofacial injuries

***

The prevalence of injury was not significantly associated with demography, category, competition and duration of participation (p = 0.26).

 Berry et al. [30]

158 players at 10 institutions of the Central Collegiate Hockey Association

158

68 defensive, 90 offensive.

Sex not indicated

Elite

Questionnaire

Orofacial injuries

***

No one specific factor affecting attitudes was identified.

Negative attitudes towards mouthguard usage: defensive players > offensive players (p < 0.05).

 Bhambhani et al. [31]

99 Paralympians with spinal cord injuries

99

85 M, 11 F

3 not indicated sex

Elite

Questionnaire

Autonomic dysreflexia

***

The awareness of the signs/symptoms and consequences of boosting was not associated with their education level (p = 0.58) or injury duration (p = 0.22).

 Blank et al. [32]

883 junior athletes’ parents

883

409 M

474 F

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Medicine use

***

Knowledge: Male parents > female parents; Parental sex did not demonstrate a significant influence on attitudes towards doping (p < 0.01).

 Bloodgood et al. [33]

252 youth athletes and 300 parents

Parents: 90 M 210F

Youth: 207 M 45F

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Brain Injury

***

Agreed concussions are “a critical issue”: 13–15 years > 16–18 years (p < 0.05).

Concussions are “a critical issue”: mothers> fathers (p < 0.05).

Disagree “dumb for caring about concussions”: girls> boys (p < 0.05).

 Broglio et al. [34]

727 soccer professionals

727

650 athletes

43 coaches

34 medical staff

Sex not indicated

Professional

Questionnaire

Concussion

***

The following are reasons for not reporting concussions:

Believe the injury was not serious (72.7%); not knowing it was a concussion (18.2%); not want the team down (4.5%); Believe concussions are part of the game (4.5%).

 Brown et al. [35]

240 high school athletes (cross-country, volleyball, soccer, tennis, drill, cheer, colour guard, band, and swimming) and their 10 coaches

240 F athletes, 10 coaches

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Female triad risk

***

Average triad knowledge score differed among teams (p = 0.01); triad awareness among athletes (average knowledge score was 2.79 ± 1.61 out of 8).

 Chan et al. [36]

410 athletes from individual sports (athletics-track, athletics-field, badminton, gymnastics, swimming, and triathlon) and team sports (cricket, soccer, field hockey, basketball, rugby and water polo)

410

227 M

183 F

Elite

Questionnaire

Medicine use

****

When controlled motivation is low: autonomous motivation ↓ → doping intention ↑ (p < 0.01).

When controlled motivation is high: no significant between autonomous motivation and doping intention (p = 0.57).

When autonomous motivation was low: controlled motivation↓ → doping intention ↑ (p < 0.01); when autonomous motivation was low: no significant between controlled motivation and doping intention (p = 0.50).

 Coffey et al. [37]

149 professional and semi-professional soccer players

149 M

Professional

Questionnaire

Concussion

***

Concussion report odds: defenders > other playing positions (p = 0.05).

 Cournoyer and Tripp [38]

334 varsity high school soccer players

334

Sex not indicated

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Concussion

**

No correlations were found between the method of education and the knowledge of symptoms or consequences of concussion (1 − β = 0.82).

 Kerr et al. [39]

214 former NCAA collegiate athletes

214

140 M

74 F

Mixed

Questionnaire

Concussion

***

In low/noncontact sports: self-identified sports-related concussions non-disclosure: M > F (PR = 2.88).

 Kuhl et al. [40]

94 equestrian riders

94

27  M, 67 F

64 amateurs

30 professionals

Mixed

Questionnaire

Concussion

**

Experience level did not influence the rates of concussion (p value not reported).

 Kurowski et al. [41]

496 high school athletes

496

384 M 112F

212 American football

123 soccer

89 basketball

72 wrestling

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Concussion

***

No association found between improved concussion knowledge and improved self-reported behaviours (p = 0.63);

Age (p = 0.01) ↑ & female sex (p = 0.03) → concussion knowledge↑;

Age (p = 0.01) ↓ & female sex (p = 0.00) & soccer participation (p = 0.02) → self-reported behaviours ↑.

 Ma [42]

236 basketball players

236 M

77 professionals

159 semi-professionals

Mixed

Questionnaire

Orofacial injuries

**

The incidence of dental and oral injuries was related to the length of training time (p value not reported).

 McCrea et al. [43]

1532 varsity soccer players from 20 high schools

1532

Sex not indicated

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Concussion

***

No significant relationship found between a player’s prior concussion history and the likelihood of concussion reporting during the season.

 Meyers et al. [44]

298 athletes in non-traditional non-NCAA sports (downhill skiing, martial arts, rock climbing, rodeo, skydiving and telemark skiing) and traditional NCAA sports (equestrian, golf, swimming/diving, tennis and track)

298 F

152 non-NCAA athletes

146 traditional NCAA athletes

Mixed

Questionnaire

Pain-coping

***

Women athletes pain-coping traits: non-traditional individual-sport activity < coach-structured traditional NCAA sports (Wilks’ λ F6,291 = 12.92; p = 0.00).

 Miyashita et al. [45]

454 high school athletes

454

242 M

212 F

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Concussion

**

Participants were asked if the importance of a game/event should dictate when they are allowed to return to play, and 50.9% stated “yes” with no difference between sexes (p = 0.10) or age (p = 0.19).

 Muwonge et al. [46]

360 professional athletes (basketball, soccer, handball, rugby, athletics and cycling)

360

218 M

142 F

Professional

Questionnaire

Medicine use

****

Female athletes mean PEAS scores: with a prior doping history > without doping history (p = 0.10)

 Norcross et al. [47]

66 soccer and basketball coaches from 15 high schools

66 coaches:

16 boys soccer

17 girls soccer

18 boys basketball

15 girls basketball

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Lower extremity injury

***

Coaches’ injury prevention programs awareness: girls’ team > boys’ team (p = 0.00);

Soccer > basketball (p = 0.05).

 Onyeaso and Adegbesan [48]

42 coaches of secondary school athletes

42

25 M

17 F

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Orofacial injuries

**

Statistically significant association (p < 0.05) was found between the sports and usage of mouthguards by the athletes as claimed by the coaches.

 Overbye [49]

775 elite athletes from 40 sports

775

465 M

310 F

Elite

Questionnaire

Medicine use

***

Interests in anabolic-androgenic steroids use: M > F (p = 0.00);

Speed and power sports athletes> motor-skill sport athletes (p = 0.02);

Team sports athletes >motor-skill sport athlete (p = 0.08);

Endurance sport athletes > motor-skill sport athletes (p = 0.15).

 Register-Mihalik [50]

167 high school athletes

167

97 M

55 F

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Concussion

***

No association found between increased athlete knowledge and attitude and prevalence of playing while experiencing concussion symptoms (p = 0.84).

 Reuter and Short [51]

154 noncontact/limited-contact sports athletes

154

Swimming 27 M 18 FTrack 26 M 28 FBaseball 25 M

Elite

Questionnaire

Perceived risk of injury

**

Uncontrollable injury scores showed a significant difference between 3 sports (all about p = 0.00) with baseball players fearing the most risk and swimmers fearing the least.

Risk of controllable injuries showed a significant difference between swimming and baseball (p = 0.01) with baseball players fearing the most risk and swimmers the least.

Risk of upper body injury scores indicated a significant difference between track and swimming (p = 0.00) and track and baseball (p = 0.00).

Swimmers reported the most fear of upper body injury while track athletes scored the lowest.

Risk of re-injury scores indicated a significant difference between track and baseball (p = 0.00), and baseball and swimming (p = 0.00).

 Shendell et al. [52]

1138 endurance athletes (full marathon, half marathon, and wheelchair athletes)

1138

499 M

639 F

Mixed

Questionnaire

Asthma

****

About 12.10% participants reported physician-diagnosed asthma;

84.6% correctly knew an asthma action plan can prevent hospitalizations;

18.0% reported they had an asthma action plan;24.8% had ever been asked to demonstrate medication use (controller and/or rescue inhaler) but only 2 people performed daily peak flow measurements.

 Short et al. [53]

434 contact sports athletes

434

Hockey, 86 M 76 F

Soccer. 32 M 32 F

American football, 208 M

Elite

Questionnaire

Perceived risk of injury

**

Worry/concern↑ → probability of injury↑ (p < 0.01).

Worry/concern ↑ → confidence in avoiding injury↓ (p < 0.01).

Perceived probability of injury↑ → confidence in avoiding injury↓ (p < 0.01).

Confidence in avoiding injury: M soccer previous injured< M hockey Previous injured (ES = 0.52).

Confidence in avoiding injury: M soccer uninjured > M hockey uninjured (ES = 0.68).

Confidence in avoiding injury: F uninjured > F previous injured (ES = 0.38.

Perceived probability of injury: F previous injured > M previous injured (ES = 0.72).

Confidence in avoiding injury: F soccer >F hockey (ES = 0.86).

Worry/concern about injury: F hockey >F soccer (ES = 0.85).

Worry/concern: M soccer> M hockey (ES = 0.25).

 Shroyer and Stewart [54]

53 rural high school coaches

53

17 M

36 F

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Concussion

**

13% of coaches knew and 48% did not know high school athletes take longer to recover from a concussion than do older athletes.

 Sorkkila, Aunola and Ryba [55]

391 student-athletes from 6 upper secondary sport schools and their parents

391 student-athletes:

49% M 51% F

448 parents:

188 M 260 F

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Burnout

***

The higher success expectations in sport: school burnout group > mild sport burnout group (p < 0.01);

The higher success expectations in school: mild sport burnout group > school burnout group (p < 0.05).

 Strotmeyer and Lystad [56]

175 amateur Muay Thai fighters

175

114 M

61 F

High-performance amateur

Questionnaire

General injuries

***

Muay Thai fighters perceived the risk of injury in their own sport to be average and significantly lower than that in other collision and contact sports (p < 0.01).

 Tiwari et al. [57]

320 national and international level players (wrestling, karate judo, boxing, Wushu, fencing, taekwondo, hockey, canoeing and kayaking, rowing, sailing, horse riding, and shooting)

320

213 M

2017 F

Professional

Questionnaire

Orofacial injuries

**

Awareness and use of mouthguards: contact sports athletes > noncontact sports athletes (p = 0.00).

 Tulunoglu and Oezbek [58]

274 semi-professional or amateur boxers and taekwondo players

274

174 M

100 F

Mixed

Questionnaire

Orofacial injuries

**

Mouthguard awareness: players with a dental trauma experience > players without a dental trauma experience (p = 0.00);

Players with a facial trauma experience > players without a facial trauma experience (p = 0.01).

 Therkorn and Shendell [59]

120 participants including college athletes, coaches and athlete parents/guardians

120

26 coaches

37 college athletes

57 athlete parents/guardians

Student-athletes

Questionnaire

Asthma

**

The percentage of correct responses by coaches to 5 asthma knowledge questions ranged from 12% to 88%.

 Williams et al. [60]

26 professional soccer players

26 M

Professional

Questionnaire, interview

Concussion

****

The mean score on concussion knowledge was 16.4 ± 2.9 (range 11–22) and the attitude score was 59.6 ± 8.5 (range 41–71);

The interview responses identified inconsistencies between the concussion knowledge/attitude and the intended behaviours, endorsing multiple concussion misconceptions, and revealed barriers to concussion reporting.

 Zech and Wellmann [61]

139 professional and youth players

139

24 First Team players

18 U23 players

25 U19 players

17 U17 players

20 U16 players

35 U15 players

Sex not indicated

Mixed

Questionnaire

General injuries

***

Perceptions on risk factors for injuries: athletes with previous injuries > athletes without previous injuries (fatigue: p = 0.04; previous injuries: p = 0.01; environment p = 0.00).

  1. M male, F female, U under, > more than/higher than, < less than/ lower than, ↑ increase, ↓ decrease, & and, % per cent, p p-value, PR prevalence ratio, ES effect size, NCAA National Collegiate Athletic Association;
  2. According to Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) [62], the score of study quality is presented using descriptors * (scores varying from 25% (*)—one criterion met—to 100% (****)—all criteria met);
  3. Mixed: player type is mixed by professional and non-professional players as the study indicated.