Skip to main content

Table 6 Characteristics of research studies evaluating cognitive performance

From: The Effect of Fluid Intake Following Dehydration on Subsequent Athletic and Cognitive Performance: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Citation

Participants

Dh protocol; ambient temperature; duration

Total REC (min)

Dh trial BM loss (%)

Fluid type

Fluid assimilation time (min)

Fluid intake (L∙kg BM

lost−1)

Cognitive domains assessed

Ambient temperature; RH; airflow

Cognitive domains significantly affected by fluid intake (Hedges’ g)

Cian et al. (2001a) [55]

7 M, unacclimated, endurance trained

EX (V); 25 °C; 120 min

Testing at 140 and 240 min

2.7

CHO + electrolyte

80/180

1.00

Memory

Perceptive discrimination

Psychomotor function/processing speed

Mood

NS

↑ Memory 2-h post-Dh

Cian et al. (2001b) [55]

7 M, unacclimated, endurance trained

HT

Testing at 140 and 240 min

2.6

CHO + electrolyte

80/180

1.00

Memory

Perceptive discrimination

Psychomotor function/processing speed

Mood

NS

↑ Memory 2-h post-Dh

↓ Fatigue

Grego et al. (2004) [48]

8 M, endurance trained cyclists

EX (V); 20–21 °C; 180 min

5

4.1

Water

185

0.73

Perceptual discrimination

Memory/processing speed

NS

No effect

Serwah et al. (2006a) [68]

8 M

EX (V); 31 °C; 90 min

3

1.7

Water

9

1.00

Psychomotor function/processing speed

NS

No effect

Serwah et al. (2006b) [68]

8 M

EX (V); 31 °C; 90 min

3

1.7

Water

90

0.50

Psychomotor function/processing speed

NS

No effect

Edwards et al. (2007b) [58]

11 M, moderately active soccer players

EX; 19–25 °C; 90 min

0

2.4

Water

90

0.80

Visual scanning/processing speed

NS

No effect

Adam et al. (2008a) [56]

8 (6 M), physically active soldiers

HT

120

3.0

NS

300

NS

Psychomotor function/processing speed

Psychomotor function

Perceptive discrimination

Visual scanning/vigilance

20 °C; 50%; 1 m/s

No effect

Adam et al. (2008b) [56]

8 (6 M), physically active soldiers

HT

120

3.0

NS

300

NS

Psychomotor function/processing speed

Psychomotor function

Perceptive discrimination

Visual scanning/vigilance

2 °C; 50%; 2.2 m/s

No effect

D’Anci et al. (2009a) [73]

16 M, university athletes

EX; 60 min

NS

2.0

Water

60

NS

Memory

Psychomotor function/processing speed

Arithmetic/processing speed

Visual scanning/vigilance

Spatial processing

Mood

NS

↑ Psychomotor function/processing speed

↓ Anger, fatigue, depression, tension and confusion; ↑ vigour

D’Anci et al. (2009b) [73]

13 (0 M), university athletes

EX; 60–75 min

NS

1.7

Water

60-75

NS

Memory

Psychomotor function/processing speed

Arithmetic/processing speed

Visual scanning/vigilance

Spatial processing

Mood

NS

↑ Psychomotor function/processing speed

↓ Anger, fatigue, depression, tension and confusion; ↑ vigour

Ganio et al. (2011) [69]

24 M, physically fit

EX; 28 °C; 40 min

20

1.6

Water

60

NS

Psychomotor function/processing speed

Visual scanning/vigilance

Memory/processing speed

Learning/memory

Logical reasoning/processing speed

Mood

23 °C

↑ Psychomotor function/processing speed and memory/processing speed

↓ Fatigue and tension

Ely et al. (2012b) [67]

32 M, unacclimated

EX; 50 °C; 3 h W/R

90

4.1

NaCl + water

270

1.00

Psychomotor function/processing speed

Memory/processing speed

Logical reasoning/processing speed

Mood

Testing at 10, 20, 30 and 40 °C

No effect

Wilson et al. (2014) [60]

8 M, licenced jockeys

EX; 20 °C; 45 min

0

1.8

Water

~35

1.00

Response inhibition

NS

No effect

Wittbrodt et al. (2015a) [70]

12 M, recreationally active

EX (V); 32 °C; 50 min

NS

1.5

Water

>50

1.00

Psychomotor function/processing speed

Memory

Perceptive discrimination

Visual scanning/processing speed

32 °C; 65%

No effect

Wittbrodt et al. (2015b) [70]

12 M, recreationally active

EX (V); 32 °C; 50 min

NS

1.5

Water

>50

0.80

Psychomotor function/processing speed

Memory

Perceptive discrimination

Visual scanning/processing speed

32 °C; 65%

No effect

  1. Exercise intensity is described as high (H), vigorous (V) or moderate (M), in accordance with classifications outlined by Norton et al. [86]. Values are Hedges’ g effect sizes
  2. CHO carbohydrate, Dh dehydration, EX exercise, HT heat, NS not specified, Total REC time from completing the dehydration protocol to commencing the subsequent task, W/R work rest cycle