Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparisons of factor loadings and intercepts of the individual Exercise Addiction Inventory items in six samples from five different countries

From: A cross-cultural re-evaluation of the Exercise Addiction Inventory (EAI) in five countries

Items

Test of equality of factor loadings

Test of equality of intercepts

Δ χ 2

p -Value

ΔRMSEA

ΔCFI

Δ χ 2

p -Value

ΔRMSEA

ΔCFI

Exercise is the most important thing in my life (item 1)

13.0

<0.03

0.001

0.002

225.9

<0.001

0.027

0.063

Conflicts have arisen between me and my family and/or my partner about the amount of exercise (item 2)

13.7

<0.02

0.001

0.003

1,238.5

<0.001

0.069

0.292

I use exercise as a way of changing my mood (item 3)

34.9

<0.001

0.004

0.007

214.7

<0.001

0.005

0.061

Over time I have increased the amount of exercise I do in a day (item 4)

3.7

0.600

0.001

0.004

179.9

<0.001

0.017

0.247

If I have to miss an exercise session I feel moody and irritable (item 5)

15.7

<0.01

0.001

0.003

153.0

<0.001

0.001

0.042

If I cut down the amount of exercise I do, and then start again, I always end up exercising as often as I did before (item 6)

15.6

<0.01

0.001

0.003

140.8

<0.001

0.004

0.068

  1. For the newly proposed decision criteria, to compare two-nested models the cut-off value of ΔCFI is ≤0.01 and the cut-off value for ΔRMSEA is ≤0.015 [27, 28].
  2. Δχ 2 Satorra–Bentler scaled (S–B scaled) χ 2 difference test, ΔRMSEA the difference of root mean squared error of approximation values in two models compared, ΔCFI the difference of comparative fit index values in two models compared.